@sad slav No they don't, they don't care about expressing their oh so deeply philosophical opinion.
`authoritarians who can't have free speech getting in the way of their power`
Correct. A great tactic, no?

@WizardLizardInABlizzard correct

@sad slav Do what? Express their mainstream opinion? They aren't going to die in the name of that

Yes

It's rather red pilled

If people knew what they needed and had the agency to get it, we'd be in an utopia

They don't necessarily die out, nor is it purely genetic. The men who created the good times won't be the same as the men living in those good times.
`they will rise up, eventually`
They all do, but it's a lot more harder and longer when you don't have arbitrary things like rights.

Me too

In fact, I have roots in one that was a theocracy

and it was great

No, it worked out.

```by getting overthrown
it starts being corrupt
beurocracy all over the place```
As with every nation with a government ever.

```giving the rights to individuals from the state makes it more safe```
No it doesn't, anti-state ideology is allowed to run wild

```natural selection gets rid of parasites and people who ruin the system```
It isn't purely genetic, people have the free will to be degenerates any time.
```#freethemarket```
You mean what creates degeneracy?

@sad slav Night-watch state is just a battle royale of who can control the government and expand it
@WizardLizardInABlizzard Yeah

```they will not have a reason to overthrow the government who...is just protecting them and doing nothing with their personal stuff like rights```
I would since they are giving too many rights. People usually revolt when they are hungry, though. Not for rights. Free speech allows for ideology to run rampant, you're advocating a very unstable model
```Watch and snuff out dangers to the state not criminal punishment```
Criminal punishment *is* snuffing dangers out, lol

Subversion can work, sure. But that seems pretty *orwellian* to me

```Free speech allows for ideology to run rampant, you're advocating a very unstable model```
To hammer this in, look at who controls the media usually

Yeah, just (((it))) up

```if the basis of the ideology are based on having those rights, the rights will not make them fall apart```
I'm not sure what you said here.
```Better to have extremists fight each other than imprison them and give fuel to their cause```
Them dying to each other doesn't fuel them but imprisonment does. Wow.
```it doesn't stop underground extremism```
It stops overground extremism, that's the point. Overground is more dangerous than undergound

```in my country, locking up people for minor things and restricting their human rights didn't stop them from making an uprising```
Not in mine 😎
```and a lot of people don't think like you, you don't even know what's best for all people, you know what's best for the ones who support your system and you just restrict rights of the ones who don't```
Do you know that people need rights? I support restricting rights for everyone, I'm not some *bigot*.
```you are just gay and you have daddy complexes```
>

>authoritarianism means welfare state

high iq take

where?

Oridot

@Logical-Scholar a MP tried to tell them not to do it

he said in public not to have sex with the foreigners because of just that

was it a she?

huh

half?

what?

@sad slav not true

>Russians are mutts
I hate seeing this dumb take

calculate how?

>twins

>twins

>twins

is no one going to point out the weird part here

>I was just pretending to be retarded

`Also they are more culturally similar than neither like to admit`
Closest is wisconsin

because they hate Christianity

Why? Because Christ rebuked them extremely hard.

Yes, like with pornography.

No they didn't

I can only use my own inventions?

You really are a brainlet. They own the companies that produce the stuff

All of the major ones

Porn stars? Not necessarily

in fact, I don't really think they really have to star in them.
`Dont jews just own must companies in general`
This is actually pretty true, they specialize in media, before it was the theater and now it's the news, movies and, well, pornography

```Is the use of porn specifically for the subversion of Christianity or is it just to own money and is any subversion just a bi-product?```
Subversion of Christianity would be to subvert the *theology* of it. I think they have something to do with that but for porn it's for the spiritual death of people

@pvndv beep boop
```But how can you prove intent to subvert over intent to accumulate wealth?```
I can at least prove the *lack* of intent to work in the best interests of society, although, again, I'm not talking about subversion. They make it awfully easy for kids to access it, they don't warn people of the dangers etc.

People who take their faith seriously don't do it

but plenty of people are only Orthodox in name

```They make it easy? I don't really think it should be a companies responsibility over a parent's responsibility```
Why not? They can help the prevention of it. It can be the responsibility of both. I am also confused that a ''Traditionalist'' is stating this.
```That really doesnt convince me of any major intent to mess with Christianity I think its just about money```
They are definitely not caring for the spiritual wellbeing of people to produce it in the first place

@WizardLizardInABlizzard Can you philosophically justify Libertarianism?

>**literal** NPCs
you mean a literal video game?

@WizardLizardInABlizzard that's not a philosophical justification lmao

Don't misuse ''literal''

```Individual```
What's that? Are they even real?
``` freedom```
what is that?
```social growth```
???
```production ```
Is that real?
``` innovation```
Which is?


@Punished Norm I'm not defending him, I'm correcting the usage of the word

@WizardLizardInABlizzard You can't just ignore, it, that's intellectually dishonest.

```freedom=unrestricted expression of free will```
can I kill?

@WizardLizardInABlizzard so when is it murder?

can I kill babies?

I'll be back later.

@Logical-Scholar they neither have a metaphysical nor an epistemological ground

Atheism is the lack of philosophy, pretty much

which is retarded

@Noxar You want to get into this? Why don't you respond to me then?

@Noxar Here's a real red pill, all worldviews are either circular, have a self-referential principle or are subject to some kind of ad infinitum justification of axioms

@Kraftzmann the Free Because there is actually no true axiom that doesn't need to be proven

@Kraftzmann the Free I didn't say anything wrong, every worldview is subject to the Muchhausen Trilemma https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%BCnchhausen_trilemma

@Kraftzmann the Free @Noxar Yeah, but not necessarily *unique*

Orthodoxy does have it's own uniqueness for each patriarchate

@thrill_house Hoi 3

or Darkest Hour

you can conquer the world as *latvia*

I assume so

@Vril-Gesellschaft what

>prior to accepting the Holy Spirit
??????

Wait, I understand

actually not reall

what do you even mean

`btw minarchist bullshit you peddle comes right out of the trilateral commission and rockefeller funding`
This is interesting, the Rockefellers actually helped Mao's revolution. Evola was right, capitalism and communism are just 2 sides of the same coin

it's not

it's not a bad thing

yeah, like crime, but obviously we're talking about how *easy* it is for something be to corrupted

>voluntary
come on now

what, you can just pack up and leave and go to some other society?

```If you ask your mistress to have monopoly of force on you in bed, that's a lot better than rape```

bro

>ask your mistress

```Yeah, there would be thousands of 'states' in the US under AnCap. The more local the better as it gives more choice.```
Until *Imperialism*

```until they turned their backs on the morals```
*cough* protestants

```Statism doesn't stop war. In fact it promotes it.```
that's not the point

the point is that imperialism is inevitable

??????????
I objected to an cap by bringing up the fact that balkanization still leads to imperialization. Divided you fall, united you stand. Statism might encourage war but at least it wouldn't be a sitting duck

My point is that this ''US'' you spoke of is full of sitting ducks

@Vril-Gesellschaft The Church Fathers were all monarchists pretty much

except Orthodox priests :^)

`fucking lincoln quoted that verse`
not an argument
@Supreme Leader Kim 🧧 >Head of an anarchist state
not exist?

`orthodox priests deny actus purus and filioque
why would I care what they think`
Why would I care about what *you* think when you don't even know what it is

society?