Message from @Quasi
Discord ID: 502424579650748418
I can explain it on and on, but it's pointless.
Oof OK then how does that work? Workers elect a company manager who gives the profit back to the workers?
duh like google it like just read a book sweaty okay its not my job to educate you <:npc:500426131493617684>
@WizardLizardInABlizzard no. decisions are made democratically by the workers, nobody controls no-one under a socialist system
yes it is pointless
```freedom=unrestricted expression of free will```
can I kill?
@Leiro レイロ HOW DOES THAT WORK? people need leadership civilisation is a passive consiquence to our needs
@Quasi you __can__
That's the point
@WizardLizardInABlizzard the "leaders" are basically everyone under a system, consequential decisions are worked out and decided by gathering the view under every worker. The best decision/reform is implemented.
obviously not just the workers, economic planners financial advisors and more as well.
That sounds like it would need to be enforced against deviants
__a lot__
no, why it would be forcefully imposed if the workers decided it themselves?
Bc workers get tired of making decisions and elect 1 to make them all that they trust the rest is collapsing socialism
The worker does not want to make company desisions
PERIOD
@WizardLizardInABlizzard this "one" person your talking about fantastically defines the bourgeois, and that's still under the assumption that workers are "tired", which is wrong.
inferential statements seem to be arguments for kewl kids these days
@WizardLizardInABlizzard so when is it murder?
@WizardLizardInABlizzard and workers don't get "tired", if they get tired it's their loss
I'll be back later.
so why would they get tired?
When you kill dumb ass you still have the free will to make that decision and assume it's consiquencis
@Leiro レイロ because they don't want to make decisions
Have you ever worked?
Have you ever met workers?
They want to show up get payed and go home
Everything else is a chore
@WizardLizardInABlizzard inferential arguement. if they don't decide it, it's their loss, so it's in their best interests to decide on it.
IT IS NOT THO
when they suffer under such a system, they will want rk decide it so it dosent hurt them
It's in their best interest to follow a leader that won't split development Bc the whole can't agree what to focus on
You see how slow the us democratic system is
?
@WizardLizardInABlizzard that's under tha assumption that people don't know what to agree on.
And you want to apply that to companies?
the best choice will be implemented.
@WizardLizardInABlizzard because it results in more good.
@Leiro レイロ THEY DON'T THAT'S WHY THEY VOTE