Message from @Quasi

Discord ID: 502508264735637518


2018-10-18 15:46:39 UTC  

no

2018-10-18 15:46:44 UTC  

deflationary policy as well as production rates kept high, along with high birth rate and consumption rate would over time drive the power of money fags lower and lower

2018-10-18 15:46:48 UTC  

what you would call plutocrats are the guys who lobbied for Schacht to become minister of economics

2018-10-18 15:46:50 UTC  

you can't have corruption in Anarcho Capitalism by definition. You need a state.

2018-10-18 15:46:50 UTC  

true there would be corruption even in ns

2018-10-18 15:46:53 UTC  

but far less

2018-10-18 15:47:00 UTC  

since the aristocracy would be based on military achievement

2018-10-18 15:47:07 UTC  

state power would supercede money

2018-10-18 15:47:09 UTC  

yeah, like crime, but obviously we're talking about how *easy* it is for something be to corrupted

2018-10-18 15:47:26 UTC  

The replacement of the state with a private entity who has a monopoly on land, force, and production is no better. @Supreme Leader Kim 🧧

2018-10-18 15:47:27 UTC  

aristocracy based on military achievement existed in the past and it didn't prevent corruption

2018-10-18 15:47:44 UTC  

@Kierketard it would be voluntary though

2018-10-18 15:47:50 UTC  

Pinochet stole 17 million lel

2018-10-18 15:47:58 UTC  

>voluntary
come on now

2018-10-18 15:48:00 UTC  

why is representative government not voluntary

2018-10-18 15:48:01 UTC  

@agag yes and the reason it did not prevent corruption was there was no loyalty to race

2018-10-18 15:48:05 UTC  

If you ask your mistress to have monopoly of force on you in bed, that's a lot better than rape.

2018-10-18 15:48:07 UTC  

it was simply state for state's sake

2018-10-18 15:48:15 UTC  

which creates a dialectical tension of the ruled vrs the rulers

2018-10-18 15:48:20 UTC  

what, you can just pack up and leave and go to some other society?

2018-10-18 15:48:26 UTC  

```If you ask your mistress to have monopoly of force on you in bed, that's a lot better than rape```

2018-10-18 15:48:28 UTC  

ns transcends this through the collectivist concept of race/volkish identity

2018-10-18 15:48:32 UTC  

bro

2018-10-18 15:48:40 UTC  

wherein all citizens are effectively "dealt in" to govt

2018-10-18 15:48:43 UTC  

because the concept of race post-dates the medieval era, replace it with loyalty to Christendom or something and you still see that "higher loyalties" failed to prevent corruption

2018-10-18 15:48:43 UTC  

they become part of the govt

2018-10-18 15:48:46 UTC  

everyone is one state

2018-10-18 15:48:48 UTC  

working towards one goal

2018-10-18 15:48:51 UTC  

ascendancy

2018-10-18 15:48:54 UTC  

@Quasi Yeah, there would be thousands of 'states' in the US under AnCap. The more local the better as it gives more choice.

2018-10-18 15:48:55 UTC  

>ask your mistress

2018-10-18 15:49:15 UTC  

```Yeah, there would be thousands of 'states' in the US under AnCap. The more local the better as it gives more choice.```
Until *Imperialism*

2018-10-18 15:49:18 UTC  

@agag loyalty to christendom worked for a while

2018-10-18 15:49:23 UTC  

until they turned their backs on the morals

2018-10-18 15:49:29 UTC  

no not really

2018-10-18 15:49:37 UTC  

Unless you believe in a one world government, the imperialist argument is a wash.

2018-10-18 15:49:38 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/496515828372602890/502508565169307658/image0-2.jpg

2018-10-18 15:49:47 UTC  

imo christendom is what prevented Europe from totally imploding after the empire's collapse

2018-10-18 15:49:48 UTC  

```until they turned their backs on the morals```
*cough* protestants

2018-10-18 15:49:48 UTC  

Statism doesn't stop war. In fact it promotes it.

2018-10-18 15:49:52 UTC  

it lasted like one crusade and then fell apart