Message from @Quasi
Discord ID: 502508147869614100
the plutocrat still retains his riches
since they tend to diversify
@stupid Anarcho Capitalism wouldn't be America so you wouldn't have a constitution. Not sure what you're asking.
Even in Socialist nations, the government is bought lmao
Not in ns
The thing is, in a ns system money itself would lose demand over time for it
Corruption is omnipresent in every type of society m8.
no
deflationary policy as well as production rates kept high, along with high birth rate and consumption rate would over time drive the power of money fags lower and lower
what you would call plutocrats are the guys who lobbied for Schacht to become minister of economics
you can't have corruption in Anarcho Capitalism by definition. You need a state.
true there would be corruption even in ns
but far less
since the aristocracy would be based on military achievement
state power would supercede money
yeah, like crime, but obviously we're talking about how *easy* it is for something be to corrupted
The replacement of the state with a private entity who has a monopoly on land, force, and production is no better. @Supreme Leader Kim 🧧
aristocracy based on military achievement existed in the past and it didn't prevent corruption
@Kierketard it would be voluntary though
Pinochet stole 17 million lel
why is representative government not voluntary
@agag yes and the reason it did not prevent corruption was there was no loyalty to race
If you ask your mistress to have monopoly of force on you in bed, that's a lot better than rape.
it was simply state for state's sake
which creates a dialectical tension of the ruled vrs the rulers
what, you can just pack up and leave and go to some other society?
```If you ask your mistress to have monopoly of force on you in bed, that's a lot better than rape```
ns transcends this through the collectivist concept of race/volkish identity
bro
wherein all citizens are effectively "dealt in" to govt
because the concept of race post-dates the medieval era, replace it with loyalty to Christendom or something and you still see that "higher loyalties" failed to prevent corruption
they become part of the govt
everyone is one state
working towards one goal
ascendancy
@Quasi Yeah, there would be thousands of 'states' in the US under AnCap. The more local the better as it gives more choice.
>ask your mistress
```Yeah, there would be thousands of 'states' in the US under AnCap. The more local the better as it gives more choice.```
Until *Imperialism*
@agag loyalty to christendom worked for a while
until they turned their backs on the morals