Just because no one wants to reproduce with her

Not my first message lmao

I'm just a busy guy, don't have time to schmood in discord

No lol its not Braving Ruin

I'm not new at all lol

Been here a long while

@Charlemagne knows me

Not that I have to explain myself to you, prole 😉

only alright???

I'm offended

What fag

yeah lmao

funny

looks autistic

sorry daddy

Yeah dude hey

Uni life has me pinned down with work and socialising

Paleolibertarianism is neat

Squad

VC to talk about how fucked we all are?

N

Aa

I'm back

Nah man watching prolefeed

Yeah would be worth a watch

> when is the alt right going to convert to Islam
@꧁༺❀༒ൢ❀༻꧂

Why on earth would western whites convert to a middle eastern religion which doesn't share the same metaphysical, ethical, political or aesthetic foundations that the white west has?

>converting the west to a religion it has been opposed to for the last millennia in order to 'own' the left

Yeah, no.

> the left will own you before anything else happens
@꧁༺❀༒ൢ❀༻꧂

The left will eat themselves

>goat fucking arab religion

No.

I hate it when dissident right people start to think that things we traditionally oppose e.g. Islam, Socialism etc will help us '''win'''

Islam will NOT save you
Socialism will NOT save you

but muh based Mohammed
but muh based Stalin

No.

I mean socialism does have a moral code e.g. equality good (redistribution of wealth)

Seeing the problems with modern day short termist consumerism isn't an excuse to say 'I KNOW LETS HAVE THE STATE OWN EVERYTHING'

Keynesianism is so gay

hur dur aggregate demand go brrr

What?

I said I was becoming more liberal, I realised liberal wasn't the right term and deleted that tweet within a day

And 'Nietzschean' phase?

Just because I like some of Nietzsche's ideas doesn't mean I am a Nietzschean

I haven't really had an ideological label since early 2018

Correct

Labels are cringe

hur dur I'm an X

> >Nibbas out here changing history
> Whatever
@viceroy pax ?

> Im a techno-nationalist-post-reactuionary-thomist
@Craix IV

with Chinese characteristics? 😉

It's okay dude I forgive you

No....

I like Nietzsche but I'm not a Nietzschean

On AA's old Deep Lore server

Used to be an active boi

I still do

I've been on 4 livestreams with him

One episode of Unpopular Opinions

That was great fun

AHAHAH

Lol

>tory

The Britisher is just a depressed 40 year old fat virgin who lives with his mum

Yeah it is gay

Britisher was the one defending faggotry and porn

>has nuanced opinion on freedom and the natural degeneracy of humans

Britisher: bUt YoU wAnT tO tElL mE wHaT tO dO

No Britisher, listen to what I'm saying.

Oi

Anglo gang

cummies are a human right

ahaha

but muh inalienable rights

Don't care

*mussolini face*

Yeah I've never met the chap either

😉

lolberts?

*bang*

>still believing in the NAP in 2020

Yes.

Most libertarians are lolberts

Yes.

WELCOME ALL

>216 questions

It also asks like the same questions 5 times

eh

It conflates social liberalism with a like for technology

So apart from that axis it seems relatively accurate for me

Libertarians only see hard power but don't understand soft power

Furthermore, intersubjectively verifiable property (libertarian property norms) doesn't include things such as social norms, language, culture and other things that are important in maintaining a civilisation

Libertarians are very good at seeing the problems with 'hard power' e.g. power that uses coercion to get its way or maintain itself.

They are bad at seeing how things such as culture, ideas, language and other things affect people and how they actually can pervert the things they claim to want to defend. They can't fight back against those things because well no physical coercion has be initiated and thus libertarians don't see the problem - 'just don't listen/watch/engage in it man, then it can't hurt you'

Truediltom did a good job at throwing the NAP out of the door back in 2017 - https://soundcloud.com/truediltom/on-the-non-aggression-principle

The non-aggression principle is useless in maintaining freedom or civilisation because it refuses to attack things that threaten it first. Libertarians are always on the defence not the offense

Virtually every libertarian thinker and activist ever?

Oh let me guess, they're not real libertarians right?

You can't enforce your own rights without someone trying to violate them first

You won't go out of your way to punish the parasite before he even has a chance to

That's the problem

You're defensive when in reality you need to offensive to defend what you care about