Message from @William

Discord ID: 696467339302010950


2020-04-05 17:34:19 UTC  

@Imperial J. Yay Carefull they come at night

2020-04-05 18:40:47 UTC  

@RIP Skelly Thank you. This'll help.

2020-04-05 20:45:12 UTC  
2020-04-05 20:45:43 UTC  

Hey

2020-04-05 20:46:23 UTC  

hey what's up

2020-04-05 20:47:07 UTC  

Saw an invitation Link by Clossington

2020-04-05 20:48:00 UTC  

Yeah we need the token lolbert

2020-04-05 20:48:04 UTC  

I hope proletariat does not mean, I have to advance class struggle

2020-04-05 20:54:45 UTC  

No you need to advance class servitude

2020-04-05 21:04:37 UTC  

Yeah

2020-04-05 21:04:45 UTC  

Class servitude.

2020-04-05 21:06:38 UTC  

Do I have a secession right?

2020-04-05 21:08:12 UTC  

lolberts may be bullied

2020-04-05 21:09:10 UTC  

nice

2020-04-05 21:11:07 UTC  

lolberts?

2020-04-05 21:11:12 UTC  

*bang*

2020-04-05 21:11:30 UTC  

bang bang

2020-04-05 21:12:00 UTC  

>still believing in the NAP in 2020

2020-04-05 21:12:16 UTC  

For some reason, being libertarian equals lolbertarian 😂

2020-04-05 21:12:33 UTC  

Yes.

2020-04-05 21:12:49 UTC  

Most libertarians are lolberts

2020-04-05 21:13:03 UTC  

@William the doomer anglo is also here

2020-04-05 21:13:10 UTC  

Yes.

2020-04-05 21:13:13 UTC  

WELCOME ALL

2020-04-05 21:19:02 UTC  

```Most libertarians are lolberts```
Sadly true. The best thing that could happen for the libertarian cause is the dissolution of the LP.

2020-04-05 21:19:28 UTC  

Among other organizations

2020-04-05 21:21:25 UTC  

Lolbergs have a terrible understanding of power

2020-04-05 21:26:41 UTC  

Yeah, that's the biggest blind spot in the Mises Institute and others I think as well

2020-04-05 21:30:24 UTC  

Libertarians only see hard power but don't understand soft power

2020-04-05 21:30:51 UTC  

?

2020-04-05 21:31:26 UTC  

Furthermore, intersubjectively verifiable property (libertarian property norms) doesn't include things such as social norms, language, culture and other things that are important in maintaining a civilisation

2020-04-05 21:32:35 UTC  

Libertarians are very good at seeing the problems with 'hard power' e.g. power that uses coercion to get its way or maintain itself.

2020-04-05 21:34:27 UTC  

They are bad at seeing how things such as culture, ideas, language and other things affect people and how they actually can pervert the things they claim to want to defend. They can't fight back against those things because well no physical coercion has be initiated and thus libertarians don't see the problem - 'just don't listen/watch/engage in it man, then it can't hurt you'

2020-04-05 21:35:13 UTC  

Truediltom did a good job at throwing the NAP out of the door back in 2017 - https://soundcloud.com/truediltom/on-the-non-aggression-principle

2020-04-05 21:36:19 UTC  

The non-aggression principle is useless in maintaining freedom or civilisation because it refuses to attack things that threaten it first. Libertarians are always on the defence not the offense

2020-04-05 21:36:27 UTC  

Who said, libertarians categorically oppose physical coercion?

2020-04-05 21:37:09 UTC  

Virtually every libertarian thinker and activist ever?

2020-04-05 21:37:21 UTC  

Oh let me guess, they're not real libertarians right?

2020-04-05 21:37:28 UTC  

Government coercion is opposed

2020-04-05 21:37:41 UTC  

CRUSH YOUR ENEMIES