Message from @glamp

Discord ID: 641871494355615744


2019-11-07 05:25:43 UTC  

cause you justify it with science?

2019-11-07 05:25:46 UTC  

@Deleted User this, fuck

2019-11-07 05:26:06 UTC  

the anti-christs I tell you

2019-11-07 05:26:15 UTC  

@glamp Dude just so you know its a really bad arguement to say those traits means race is justified. Also, just because race is intuitive to you doesnt mean science is.

2019-11-07 05:26:41 UTC  

Define race taxonomically

2019-11-07 05:26:52 UTC  

Lets walk u by the hand

2019-11-07 05:27:01 UTC  

What is race but a categorization by biological traits? Or do you have a specific definition other than that, @Yek

2019-11-07 05:27:09 UTC  

intuitive black now

2019-11-07 05:27:12 UTC  

@Yek So are you campaigning to end the distinctions amongst wolves?

2019-11-07 05:27:13 UTC  

Tigers?

2019-11-07 05:27:16 UTC  

<:kraut:389881471881576448>

2019-11-07 05:27:16 UTC  

Jays

2019-11-07 05:27:20 UTC  

Corvids

2019-11-07 05:27:21 UTC  

You guys aren't being fair. Yek has a very consistent position.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/634367565304561675/641871290596065281/DdK3Wl4XUAALeLx.jpeg

2019-11-07 05:27:30 UTC  

?

2019-11-07 05:27:36 UTC  

Magic brains

2019-11-07 05:27:49 UTC  

secular creationist

2019-11-07 05:27:51 UTC  

the brain is pretty magic tbh

2019-11-07 05:27:53 UTC  

<:tucker:587843675413807106>

2019-11-07 05:27:57 UTC  

@Yek of course its justified, we categorize things based on much lesser differences. there are recognized subspecies of elk that you'd need a trained zoologist to discern between because the differences are so subtle. if you think the differences between chinese and europeans, or europeans and africans, or native americans and abos, arent enough to warrant race you have some sort of brain problem

2019-11-07 05:28:09 UTC  

im sorry, but this seriously is like looking up at the sky and saying its not blue

2019-11-07 05:28:12 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/634367565304561675/641871505726373898/APmr9BG.png

2019-11-07 05:28:16 UTC  

you sound insane

2019-11-07 05:28:20 UTC  

@blanc Its an informal biological category. There are lower taxonomical frequencies such as sub species, however even that isnt universally accepted in mdoern taxonomy.

2019-11-07 05:28:45 UTC  

@glamp Again, science isnt intuitive.

2019-11-07 05:28:45 UTC  

@Yek
>informal
Great then we can assign traits and categorize races informally!

2019-11-07 05:28:47 UTC  

i wish the asian skull was the one that was yellow

2019-11-07 05:28:54 UTC  

Oh wow

2019-11-07 05:29:03 UTC  

So in order to bring about the global mulatto, Yek's willing to toss out all sub-speciation

2019-11-07 05:29:14 UTC  

That's expectable move for the globo-homos in fact

2019-11-07 05:29:22 UTC  

What do you call human varieties friend

2019-11-07 05:29:26 UTC  

@Yek you have no science. i already explained why more variation within than between is a weak argument. this holds true for humans and a subspecies of chimp. do you think the human chimp distinction is meaningless?

2019-11-07 05:29:32 UTC  

and we are the evil "Nazi's" lol

2019-11-07 05:29:41 UTC  

@blanc human variation?

2019-11-07 05:29:43 UTC  

"Universally accepted in modern taxonomy" so we must go by what the consensus of academia alone says?

2019-11-07 05:29:48 UTC  

"Science is not fitting our political agenda, therefore we must change Science."

2019-11-07 05:29:56 UTC  

Sounds like newspeak

2019-11-07 05:30:02 UTC  

Ill keep the race word

2019-11-07 05:30:03 UTC  

academia is fucked

2019-11-07 05:30:07 UTC  

also its not even really intuition

2019-11-07 05:30:11 UTC  

too many retards went to college