Message from @glamp

Discord ID: 642613183131156490


2019-11-09 06:31:17 UTC  

I think this is enough for now. Before, I used to shit on the Telelogical Argument. I am reconsidering it now. Bye, Banjod, Fuguer, glamp, panik, and others. This was fun.

2019-11-09 06:31:46 UTC  

it's a nice book, it's got a bunch of interactive html files

2019-11-09 06:32:00 UTC  

The detailed particle physics mechanism responsible for inflation is unknown. The **basic inflationary paradigm is accepted by most physicists**, as **a number of inflation model predictions have been confirmed by observation**; however, a substantial minority of scientists dissent from this position.The hypothetical field thought to be responsible for inflation is called the inflaton.

2019-11-09 06:32:34 UTC  

@glamp found a copy, thanks

2019-11-09 06:32:59 UTC  

If god help you stay sane enjoy

2019-11-09 06:32:59 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/634367565304561675/642612584331214848/1573231344756.png

2019-11-09 06:33:37 UTC  

shes ok

2019-11-09 06:33:41 UTC  

I do not think God helps me stay sane. If anything, my recent conversion has been stressful.

2019-11-09 06:33:46 UTC  

if you want good proofs for gods existence that cant be invalidated with physics, read ed feser's book "five proofs of the existence of god"

2019-11-09 06:33:58 UTC  

it's written for laymen

2019-11-09 06:34:06 UTC  

bye, guys. Need to finish this book so I can read that book on Nietzsche.

2019-11-09 06:34:16 UTC  

glamp say it aint so

2019-11-09 06:34:23 UTC  

you're not god cucking are you

2019-11-09 06:34:31 UTC  

@Billy Ray gym e-thot being put in check

2019-11-09 06:34:35 UTC  

@glamp I do not like most of the arguments. Though, 1. is entertaining.

2019-11-09 06:34:50 UTC  

sorry duck but physics has to bend the knee to metaphysics

2019-11-09 06:34:56 UTC  

the five arguments feel like they were written by a bright kindergartener

2019-11-09 06:34:57 UTC  

science doesn't disprove god though

2019-11-09 06:35:02 UTC  

theyre not very compelling

2019-11-09 06:35:22 UTC  

you havent interacted with the real ones, only caricatures

2019-11-09 06:35:24 UTC  

yes, but i have quantum metaphysics

2019-11-09 06:35:42 UTC  

I find 1. compelling so far. I read Richard Carrier's criticism and was not swayed.

2019-11-09 06:35:45 UTC  

plus there is the passing down of knowledge through religion that could help adherents retain culture, and moral ideas throughout all of time, despite of the situation.

2019-11-09 06:35:59 UTC  

1. is first mover

2019-11-09 06:36:01 UTC  

thats brainlet tier

2019-11-09 06:36:28 UTC  

I read Richard Carrier's critique and was unconvinced.

2019-11-09 06:36:30 UTC  

i would bet 1000 dollars you've only heard the strawman version of the argument from motion

2019-11-09 06:36:31 UTC  

write them all

2019-11-09 06:36:34 UTC  

in a sentence

2019-11-09 06:36:37 UTC  

1. first mover

2019-11-09 06:36:39 UTC  

2.?

2019-11-09 06:36:43 UTC  

was banjod

2019-11-09 06:36:50 UTC  

the first mover?

2019-11-09 06:37:08 UTC  

the first mover was banjod

2019-11-09 06:37:15 UTC  

but dont you know that argument?

2019-11-09 06:37:19 UTC  

yea ive been thinking about how most gods ever conceived are intrinsically tied to genesis
its interesting

2019-11-09 06:37:23 UTC  

Unmoved Mover is necessary

2019-11-09 06:37:30 UTC  

In one form or another

2019-11-09 06:37:39 UTC  

and i wonder if thats a first order condition

2019-11-09 06:37:41 UTC  

yes so almost all gods are based on fallacious reasoning