they existed for profit

therefore

capitalism

so

stalin was a capitalist pig

kill him

no, like you said

"If there's a single corporation, no matter how small it is, and it's not run by the state nor it's a cooperative, then it's capitalism(edited)
Because the only purpose of private property is making profit"

the communist loves to abuse definitions

this goy isn't falling for it.

and soviet russia had a currency and a wage system anyway lmao

before and after stalin

look above your own quoted definition

if x then y

x = corporation existing

y = capitalism

x existed in communism

therefore it was capitalism

and the wage was the profit the man makes from selling his object

legally, one man undertaking the role of a company may be a company himself

you think of corporations as being divergent from humanity, soulless beings, yet you are wrong

one man can undertake the role of a corporation

and in my example the man does so

if you stockpile some wood, carve out duck toys out of them and sell them to your friends, you''re a corporation working for profit

@Advocatus Diaboli that doesn't matter

private property isn't just made in the form of a corporation

you said yourself you arent allowed to sell for profit if you make your own wares

yes, and selling a duck toy for a profit is a wage

ah of course

so the service industry

has no wages

because they dont produce anything

psychologists dont have wages

doctors dont have wages

personal trainers dont have wages

wage is what you get for work producing stuff you don't own

and some pretty bad logic

back to the topic

you're a freelance psychologist

you work for a wage

you own yourself

you work only for yourself

that is private

and has a wage

your wage isnt earned while working for someone else

>you produce their mental health

i have yet to hear something this retarded in my life

there is no production in services

production requires tangibility

you produce nothing by telling a guy he has depression, who then pays you. And if you do, and he pays you and you earn a wage like that, the man who makes a duck doesnt own his customer either

so he is by your definition the same

aka a corporation, aka capitalistic

@Fuju jewish nationalism isnt ok

@Advocatus Diaboli you owns the means to achieve the mental health

once again

stop the word masturbation

you own the means to achieve the person's mental health

by the same logic, a lawyer helping a man to get out of legal trouble does not own the man, but he owns the knowledge to help him get out of legal trouble

your allegories make no sense

yes it is

legally speaking they are wages

first you went to thinking that psychologists have wages, now they dont

make up your fucking mind, tankie

the problem here is that you have no understanding of what you say, you merely try to fit everything into your perverted definitions of reality, so that you can apply reality to your worldview

that is not how it works.

and mind you

even if it is

like you say it is

the soviet union still had wages

now i know

youre going to say if youre a doctor earns wages in the ussr it's ok because he "owns the production"

yet he doesnt

he does only on papaer.

*paper

in practice he owns nothing

this democratic ownership is a falsehood

he can't take a machine from a hospital and put it in his own home

no that's what I know

when everybody is the owner

no one is

screaming "WHAT" while your soy is about to spill wont retract from the point that i made

the car cant be owned by all people

because people had locks

you couldnt take another man's car

you couldnt go into another man's house

just because you *say* it was public, does not make it so

it is owned by the state

not by the people

by the people is a fancy, populist phrase that people love to use

it is not so in actuality

ah of course

true

here we go

not true communism

as always

word masturbation from post modernist idiots

well then the ussr wasnt communism

now was it