Wes The Savage
Discord ID: 206644850609618945
669 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/7
| Next
!agree
Shivangi?
is that you in the profile pic?
Aw sheeit
damn, because I was gonna test my new cringe up line on them ๐
XD
The Autrian, and Neoclassical schools along with some parts of the Classical School are based on evidence, historical records, and logical demonstration via logical arguments, the best sconomic schools, Laissez-faire is on record before it dies years ago the best economic model and it can even factor in various middle grounds, like labor unions, syndicates, cryptocurrencies if they're not set up like ponzie schemes, backed by gold, silver, and platinum group metals, and can even factor in scientific innovation if the government doesn't go into cahoots with corporate whores..
@Mips what form of capitalism?
There are MANY of them, several base forms, and then many derivatives of each form..
Some degrees of evidence and documents prove your argument of government funded research, but other areas corporate whores and feds interfered with other branches of scientific research if they can't pull a taxation scheme on it..
We ain't had true laissez-faire since the time period of 1870-WW2
you can see it's practice pop up in limited degrees
but not full blown anymore
hasn't been since time period I mentioned
he better, or i'll rape his face with muh tongue
BETTER REPORT ME!!
I JUST THREATENED SECUAL DEVIANCY!!~
XD
@AsianMessiah it can work under minarchism if you can update the constitutional bindings to the republic and being it back to minarchism by decorporatizing
which is gonna be the first step towards an anarchism styled society
only after you figure out a better model than what we have on the private court system
there's a possibility for variability as a weakness
@Puma not necessarily
You have to prove that claim
I request you demonstrate this Puma, because you can have roads without the taxation system or in a limited degree.
Toll systems, Toll Booths, Taxation based on elected apportionment if it's in the top 5 issues..
Yeah, basically before the rather illegal 16th amendment was passed and the fed reserve rose in that same year, which were cofacters in starting the great Depression my dad was born during the time of, but that's another story for a later period
@LordCaledus We should rule by votes, apportionment, self-ownership, and through individual liberties..
Not necessarily
if anarchistic societal law structure were done well enough, democracies would be prevented
Natural selection will push for more charitable ones over time if the people like them enough due to their own self interests influncing the choice and social darwisnism coming along
it is possible
Again, you'd do so by by votes, census, polls, apportionment, self-ownership, and through individual liberties..
as long as they don't completely conflate the lattert
Me
@Jaz (Raisu) ME DADDY
@LordCaledus CAN YOU PROVE THAT!?
The only way it could become authoritarian is if democracies were to form
same with corporatocracy formation
They can leave and find another place obviously...
Is that Chris Ray Gun in drag?
JK JK
I contributed my pieces, daddu raisu and kids, have fun
I will, I have monster girl quest
โค
XD
You fondle them inaproppriately, here cums my rape apology folks
@Shurik if that system goes into cahoots with corporate whores, passes an illegal amendment against your right to choose through voting what your tax bracket would be, if you need one, and where they would go is done, then it's time to rebuild it and remove those things as well as the worst of corproate laws via new constitutional amendments
then eventually shrink into an anarchist society if the timing and conditions favor it
I've said my final piece this time in all seriousness
have fun kids
@Jaz (Raisu) slide into muh DMs later, but be gentle though ๐
@AsianMessiah you could too
XD
HAHAH!!!
^^^
debated a communist off and on for 3 hours
when he couldn't challenge my points, he brings in trolls
and fucking REEEEs the place up
Asian saw it
I literally just replied to a socialist on youtube:
"Pulling the old No True Scotsman Fallacy again, why not just say "True Democratic Socialism has been tried and failed"?
United States calls the state owning the means of production and a bunch of social programs parts of State Socialism and Planned Economics, because of its pathologies are similary in how True Socialism would act, but it's owned by the state and also involves Planned Economics.
USSR Was State Socialism when Stalin took over, same with Mao when he took over China, what democratic socialist system was attempted then was gone..
In fact you could say the same about North Korea.
"The state capitalized off the workers" claim is nonsense, it's not capitalism, there was no private ownership, no private companies, peronal property is unable to be used for profit(which is what private property IS) no private companies(whether single owners or collective owners) hiring people, no wage labor, no voluntary exchange, no capital accumulation, and no competitive markets..
Stop the the fallacies and circular arguments please."
@Ipod you can't enlighten those who refuse to listen
syndicalists, mututalists, communists, socialists, and accelerationists are all the worst
yes
What about BOTH Rothbard AND Smith?
if Sargon starts calling himself "Classical Libertarian" I may die from lack of oxygen
People not raising their own kids, corporate and government backed nutritional pseudoscience, shitty value ideas, and tech obsession amplifying all the above
No shit
Fascists as a whole have ironically done that
You'd be more principled if you were a voluntaryist, paleolibertarian and an ethno-nationalist based off of using these premises
a democratic means would ensure destruction in the aspect of who owned the tech
Another individual to put on my shit list
We don't know that
Alpha's personal email was compromised
It basically means Anarcho-Communism
Basically, Kropotkin took out the Marxism, Central Banking, and Central Government from Communism
He didn't believe in the LTV, he didn't advocate it.
He said we didn't need a central state to establish full blown socialism
Wrong
He also said we didn't need a central government, he advocated voluntaryism to establish a collective of social communes that would network together
@Smug Usagi (CEO of the moon) Unless it were Market Socialism, that's a different story
Actually, yes there is
Adam Smith theorized on it
other Classical Era economists theorized on it
and..
there are various market theories that would allow it..
actually, it does
Mutualism and Syndicalism being market variants of socialism that's built on voluntaryism
Something that doesn't work isn't a theory
No
I didn't jump anything, I gave examples of Market Socialism Theories
Market socialism is a type of economic system involving the public, cooperative or social ownership of the means of production in the framework of a market economy. Market socialism differs from non-market socialism in that the market mechanism is utilized for the allocation of capital goods and the means of production. Depending on the specific model of market socialism, profits generated by socially owned firms may variously be used to directly remunerate employees, accrue to society at large as the source of public finance or be distributed amongst the population in a social dividend.
Block Who Danny?
and his dick
his teenie weenie asian paneenie
I'm not gay either, I have gloves
XP
His wittwe fwee incher
Nope
That actually.. makes too much sense
XD
69th
๐
669 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/7
| Next