Just because a system, or hierarchy, is flawed, dosen't mean it needs to be destroyed.

because the majority will not allow them too

do what they want

because the majority will get their will but the individual wont

@Maw is that really all? Just disagree?

So that individual is okay to do things the majority decided were bad things?

Depends on the thing.

As you know.

anything that doesnt violate the NAP?

Who enforces the NAP?

You guys can play pretend country in the future, I'll just abolish it in my region

@Puma PREAs

In favour of a state

np

ur free to do so

in ancapism

Dafuq is a PREA?

@Shurik if that system goes into cahoots with corporate whores, passes an illegal amendment against your right to choose through voting what your tax bracket would be, if you need one, and where they would go is done, then it's time to rebuild it and remove those things as well as the worst of corproate laws via new constitutional amendments

Do I think murder should be not allowed in any circumstance? Absolutely, would I want that enforced on the tiny majority that disagrees? Absolutely.

private rights enforcement agencies

then eventually shrink into an anarchist society if the timing and conditions favor it

I've said my final piece this time in all seriousness

have fun kids

Private Rights Enforcement Agency?

@Maw sure, though lets say this individual wants a road, itd be on his property, but the majority thinks there shouldnt be a road there.

Thats very statist of you

@Jaz (Raisu) slide into muh DMs later, but be gentle though 😉

It's on his property.

@AsianMessiah you could too

XD

This is quite different.

no thanks i wonder whats in there though?

HAHAH!!!

@Maw but the majority rules against it.

It's his property.

It's not shared property.

It's not shared society.

It's literally his.

@AsianMessiah who holds the PREA accountable?

This is not the same as outlawing murder.

How are they put into a position

but they can get the state to not allow him put the road there