It's called oligarchy

No we should rule as individuals

in anarchy

So have tyranny by the mob

Otherwise known as the majority

how so?

@LordCaledus We should rule by votes, apportionment, self-ownership, and through individual liberties..

That is literally what you always get without a state. The majority rule by mob rule

We would have enforcment agencies to uphold our rights

Not necessarily

It's majority rule either way

One is just less shitty

if anarchistic societal law structure were done well enough, democracies would be prevented

The enforcement agencies will enforce the will of whoever pays better

^

See: Blackwater.

Which is gonna be the majority

No you would choose which rights you want to be enforced and it would be mutiplied through out the country

Natural selection will push for more charitable ones over time if the people like them enough due to their own self interests influncing the choice and social darwisnism coming along

How would you do this?

it is possible

^

WHO chooses what rights?

The majority will choose

"We" is very... opaque.

With anarchy you cant enforce your sets of beliefs on others

The people with the money?

The majority?

in a state it happens all the time

Again, you'd do so by by votes, census, polls, apportionment, self-ownership, and through individual liberties..

This is kinda why I don't take Anarcy seriously as a position. It's just authoritarianism except worse.

Anyone here an individualist besides me?

as long as they don't completely conflate the lattert

Me

Hearing a lot of collectivism

MOI

@Jaz (Raisu) ME DADDY

Most of us are individualists.

Really huh?

@LordCaledus CAN YOU PROVE THAT!?

We're just not extreme individualists.