Who runs the courts

@Puma the consumer who is paying for it

Through the free market

So, someone will pay more in order to rig the court in his favor

@AsianMessiah it can work under minarchism if you can update the constitutional bindings to the republic and being it back to minarchism by decorporatizing

Courts... being paid for... does not sound impartial.

true Wes

True

which is gonna be the first step towards an anarchism styled society

@Puma Is that your only critisicsm?

Cause its quite weak

only after you figure out a better model than what we have on the private court system

OH SHIT

Its a pretty big criticism

there's a possibility for variability as a weakness

ITS DAD

Because now I can bulldoze your walmart road

@Puma not necessarily

@Puma Not at all once you realise that all that a law is is an opinion

Yes necesarrily

You have to prove that claim

Just a neutral reminder to not think of things in regards to how things currently are. The current state of things is bullshit and corrupt to no end so any ideology under that kind of umbrella would be absolute shit no matter what it is.

ThE lAw iS Is aN oPiNiOn

yeah it is

Not really

rn its the states opinion

No?

Society's opinion.

No, its not

No the states

How so/

It's society's opinion.

We elect those people to put those laws in place

It's society's opinion

No its the majoritys opinion

which leads to tyranny of the majority

The majority IS society.

whatever u wanna call it its evil

So should we rule by minority instead?

I request you demonstrate this Puma, because you can have roads without the taxation system or in a limited degree.

Toll systems, Toll Booths, Taxation based on elected apportionment if it's in the top 5 issues..

Yeah, basically before the rather illegal 16th amendment was passed and the fed reserve rose in that same year, which were cofacters in starting the great Depression my dad was born during the time of, but that's another story for a later period

We had that once