Bunyip
Discord ID: 528044084179501071
363 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/4
| Next
the type of food you get when you have no other option
you can go to any maccas and be fairly sure they have a good coffee
maybe it's just growing up with them, they seem like nothing special, just the same burger repackaged
could be up on the tdt archive channel
it's one of the basic claims moldbug layed, progressivism is mutation of New England protestantism, specially in the direction of hyper-universalism
gotta love how he has no understanding of the Cathedral beyond what he infers from the name
its really shitty semantics tho
he is just complaining that someone didn't use the word in what he thinks is its right meaning
its not even good semantics of holding someone to their own word usage
or getting to the bottom of a definition
its just a retard who thinks he smart cause he read a dictionary
yea i heard about that
you tend to play with word sorcery when you're out of your mind on drugs and read obscure french postmodernists
and most of Fanged Noumena is more trippy then meltdown
entertaining but a shit style in the long run
did you read a run down of acceleration I gave you?
@Skellington yes
the emancipation of capital
@Skellington i can give you a 3 hour podcast of land trying to lay his later thinking out if that interests you
<:GWaobloChildPepeShrug:407618817569718272>
you tell me
you could also read him as a prophet of the singularity rather then just a activist for its arrival
and Land does have his prophetic moments
Techno
all of the above
we won't know the structure of the singularity until it hits and at that point it is too late
the prophecy land makes is that nothing human makes it out
as we know it? no, gone
the human experience? nope gone as well
also this
***decoding flows of desire***
@Skellington land shitposting is always fun
tfw the first chapter of Fanged Noumena is about incest
how many people don't give a fuck is a more interesting poll
***The paradox of enlightenment, then, is an attempt to fix a stable relation with what is radically other, since insofar as the other is rigidly positioned within a relation it is no longer fully other. If before encountering otherness we already know what its relation to us will be, we have obliterated it in advance. And this brutal denial is the effective implication of the thought of the a priori, since if our certainties come to us without reference to otherness we have always already torn out the tongue of alterity before entering into relation with it. This aggressive logical absurdity (the absurdity of logic itself) reaches its zenith in the philosophy of Kant, whose basic problem was to find an account for the possibility of what he termed โsynthetic a priori knowledgeโ, which is knowledge that is both given in advance by ourselves, and yet adds to what we know. As we have seen, this problem is the same as that of accounting for the possibility of modernity or enlightenment, which is to say, of the inhibited encounter with alterity.***
all are wrong but so have more hope of getting out of it then others
@Skellington didn't know you were from the fbi
he didn't actually say it but given his moral system he might as well have
sorry to disappoint <:GWaobloChildPepeShrug:407618817569718272>
Political theory, tho i would prefer philosophy videos
@Pseudo-Analysist thanks
at the end of the day ancaps are stuck in a neverending loop of definitely and autistically redefining shit so they can hide their moral claims under the guise of legal theory
@Vulpes shit I forgot, how much do I have to pay to the ~~temple~~ I mean private insurance company
*cough* trying to get Rothbard to divorce his wife cus she was a catholic *cough*
363 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/4
| Next