Message from @AnarchoReign
Discord ID: 484133811530104844
@The American Nationalist I'm not but okay.
*anarchoreign is yping*
"anarchoreign is typing"
Here comes dat boi
<:noyoudidnt:459545660698525696>
"the government" makes this question far too vague to answer, you'd need to specify what level of government to be more specific. At the national level, it should be to ensure the rights of its people, both individual rights in the negative and positive, as well as the collective/communal rights
"communal"
@The American Nationalist come on in
Fucking commie get in the helicopter
The one world state that I believe will inevitable arrive should be an ayn rand minarchist state
Objectivist Gang lol
the state needs to get rid of individuals that threaten the culture
change my mind
But that can't happen in a global form imo
Globalism is retarded
@The American Nationalist I mean i don't disagree
end globalism
Just so long as their rights stay in tact
its the state that gives rights
All subversives should be treated as traitors
**N AT I O N A L S E L F I N T E R E S T**
@The American Nationalist The state's duty is to protect rights, not give them. Rights are not rights if they can be taken away by the government.
@Doctor Anon It only grants you legal rights that are based on inalienable natural rights
Freedom of Speech is absolutely essential, change my mind
people will say things that hurt the state
@The American Nationalist Not always a bad thing
The state is fallible
It should be pointed out so it can improve on it
Freedom of Association is just as essential, probably more imo
@The American Nationalist Gas the state
people never do it out of good intention, they do it for power, wether it's good or not is up to your own judgement
@J E S S E anarchist
I don't care about the state. It is only important in protecting the nation and its people. Outside of that it can get out of my life.
@The American Nationalist authie kike
news: fascist dabs on local libertarian anarchist
lmao
what is a collective, if not for group of individuals?
fascism protects the individual
@Alice Redacted <:facepalm:459545653509357578> <:YouTried:459545653723398144>
what I'm trying to get at
is that serving the "collective" without regard to the individual