wealth-adjusted HDI, ofc

:doubt

individuals are not important

the collective is where its at

The base unit of society is the family, not the individual

^

to serve the nation and the people, ensure economic success and the safety of the average working man.

economic success or stability*

To protect rights

@The American Nationalist kys

Collectivists are disgusting, extreme individualism is also disgusting

@J E S S E anarchist

@The American Nationalist I'm not but okay.

*anarchoreign is yping*

"anarchoreign is typing"
Here comes dat boi

<:noyoudidnt:459545660698525696>

"the government" makes this question far too vague to answer, you'd need to specify what level of government to be more specific. At the national level, it should be to ensure the rights of its people, both individual rights in the negative and positive, as well as the collective/communal rights

"communal"

@The American Nationalist come on in

Fucking commie get in the helicopter

The one world state that I believe will inevitable arrive should be an ayn rand minarchist state

Objectivist Gang lol

the state needs to get rid of individuals that threaten the culture

change my mind

But that can't happen in a global form imo

Globalism is retarded

@The American Nationalist I mean i don't disagree

end globalism

Just so long as their rights stay in tact

its the state that gives rights

All subversives should be treated as traitors

**N AT I O N A L S E L F I N T E R E S T**

legal rights yes

@The American Nationalist The state's duty is to protect rights, not give them. Rights are not rights if they can be taken away by the government.

@Doctor Anon It only grants you legal rights that are based on inalienable natural rights

Freedom of Speech is absolutely essential, change my mind

people will say things that hurt the state

@The American Nationalist Not always a bad thing

The state is fallible

It should be pointed out so it can improve on it

Freedom of Association is just as essential, probably more imo