"Or, they lied."

"No politicians will be jailed as a result of this failure."

We tried to employ some Soldiers but all the men from here are Soyboy Cucks and are currently in Germany

https://i.redd.it/6kfj1dm2ldb01.jpg

_again_?!

isn't that from a year ago

I think it was

http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/42730235/tide-pod-challenge-youtube-blocks-videos-after-poisoning-fears

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jan/21/venezuela-looting-violence-food-shortages

A newly formed Ministry of Urban Farming encourages people to grow tomatoes and raise chickens on their patios and rooftops. Another campaign encourages Venezuelans to breed rabbits for the table. At a recent news conference, Freddy Bernal, the urban farm minister, declared: “We need people to understand that a rabbit is not a pet. It’s two and a half kilos of meat.”

hahaha

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMqUNToomWM

"President Nicolás Maduro blames the country’s woes on an “economic war” against his government by rightwingers and foreign interests.

But his critics say his government has disrupted domestic food production by expropriating farms and factories. Meanwhile, price controls designed to make food more widely available to poorer people have had the opposite effect: many prices have been set below the cost of production, forcing food producers out of business. "

you fuckface leftists at the guardian, I don't even know what punishment is apt for this article

#Shithole

many prices have been set below the cost of production, LUUL

https://www.thedrinksbusiness.com/2018/01/hospitality-industry-wages-rise-over-10-thanks-to-brexit/

holy shit is that an industry publication, are those numbers reliable?

oh my god that's the best article I've read since the last best article I read

Really?

wow

Is my island saved?

no, islam will fuck you still

but there might be hope for some other countries if these statistics get spread around to talking heads

"The data comes from a jobseekers' site. Presumably it's the advertised salaries that are 10% higher. "

yes but there's plenty of other good numbers in the article, from all sorts of industries

hmm
<:think_woke:378717098681171988>

We've got the best numbers folks, believe me

https://i.redditmedia.com/w1c6zahgJjIjdBxI2N4GgY2I85js-ECTv5xNKnI6mIQ.jpg?w=1024&s=1b7bb70da9cad3c6c89dd2906b71aee3

http://making.duolingo.com/how-duolingo-achieved-a-5050-gender-ratio-for-new-software-engineer-hires

"We secured the best new graduates for software engineering roles, but we noticed something: they were all male. We made a number of offers to female candidates, but none accepted. The result? An all-male hiring class that didn’t reflect Duolingo’s values around a diverse workforce."

that must be like literally so traumatizing you guys

To be fair I hate 100% male working environment

yeah in my experience 100% male environments often automatically degrade to the lowest common denominator

"For the purpose of this post, we are referring to male and female genders, although we recognize that many other genders exist. ↩"

Lol wtf am i reading you guys advocating for some level of diversity?

I had a all male dept and it was turning into a Frat House

I was going to hire a woman

but I had good candidate lined up

RIGGED

I haven't really made up my mind on the issue - in an office environment, it can certainly be a positive thing to have both men and women present, as long as they're not allowed to organize meetings or run any departments

at the same time, personally I count that under the word "diversity"

I _don't_ count that, I mean

What do you mean by run depts and organise meetings?

I mean wouldn't you guys normally classify that as diversity - because you are replacing male hires for women?

that article, yes, they are fuckwits who should be shot

Oh yea i wouldn't advocate for 50/50, but do you agree it shouldn't be 100/0?

not necessarily

I wanted a woman to balance the atmosphere in the dept, if there had not been a suitable woman I would have had to hire another dude.

Luckily I knew someone ideal

I It should be whatever a meritocratic approach leads to. @Emoished

Because there will inevitably be some women who are better at a typical quote on quote "man's" job, for lack of a better term, it will not be 100/0

And by "man's" job I mean jobs usually with a larger percentage of men than women working in them

Also she didn't have to say yes

Here is my problem - i will use schools for an example - entering into university the universities do not just want to look at your atainment grades, but also the circumstances that you had when you atained them; So people who go to private school should (in some cases) be turned down in favior of people who have had a much more difficult upbringing yet obtained similar or maybe slighly lower grades. I would say that universities should do this because this will be a better measure of "latent talent" - rather than raw performance.

ok, but I'm talking about gender

Granted I have not made the link between gender/ ethnic diversity and economic background here - I very much acknowledge this

Why do I care how rich someones Mummy and Daddy are? I'm hiring them

Because then you will get people who are less good at the job, but have just had better "preperation" for it

I'll decide if they are good at the job or not

It's my dept

who's to say what level of education decides talent?

How well you can do on a test for example is of course influenced by their education - but it does not speak for their motivation or struggle to reach that level of education

which is what an interview is for...

but why should I have to pick someone based of where they got their education?

that's mental

Not based on; a Factor to consider, there are many factors to consider, this should be one of them

so you think employers put CVs in the bin if the candidate comes from the wrong side of the tracks?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/01/20/german-city-bans-new-refugees-anti-migrant-mood-increases/

did you read what i wrote?? I said it is A FACTOR not the only consideration or something like that

?

why do you think it isn't already? you are fighting for something that already exists

I was using it as an example of why you can't just hire people based on how they are in the moment

+ I guess arguing for why it should exist as it does

Yes I can

can hire whoever I prefer tbh

i dont care about you as an individual

oh you want to make rules so I and everyone else have to hire who you want me to

your not gunna start a company

just gunna tell us what to do

<:sargon_punch:382980735327535114>

??? Yea sure you can ascribe beliefs to me that I dont have

https://i.redd.it/0bf8gulibxbz.png

@Deleted User is a dipshit neocuck

Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Neo cuck 4 life

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/cathy-newman-abuse-channel-4-jordan-peterson-metoo-backlash-latest-a8170031.html

"But it is very easy to attack Cathy Newman, the female journalist whose male editor thought it would be a good idea to interview Jordan Peterson."

"“Got ya,” Peterson said when Newman fell silent for a few seconds. Peterson laughed. The joke was on her, in a way. No matter what she would have asked, a woman daring to question his expertise was bound to have ramifications. Especially in 2018."

"There is no doubt that Peterson was intelligent, determined and quick. No doubt, indeed, that the Channel 4 News interview was entertaining. But his words, on closer inspection, were vacuous and confusing, and he left gaps."

if anyone has a rocket launcher, I'd like to borrow it so I can fire it in the independents general direction

It's current year! 2018 year of women not asking questions

"More about: #MeToo, Jordan Peterson, Cathy Newman, Misogyny"

articles tags

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZPnCMVwQFk

Let's face it she's a woman she should have easily beaten a man, even if he is a Professor

this one is very subtle, so I'm going to paste it again

"But it is very easy to attack Cathy Newman, the female journalist whose male editor thought it would be a good idea to interview Jordan Peterson."

I think 100% of the comments on that article are negative towards it and the "journalist"

That Man was wrong. No Woman could ever be wrong!

RESPEK WAHMEN