@Deleted User fireweaver called me an incel virgin. Then I said:
WoW player calling another guy an incel. Then I went to sleep, and now I woke up reseted.

The reason for me being reseted, there are emotionally unstable snowflakes at power in this discord server.

I didn't even know resetting was a possible punishment...

Because dankula hates it that's why

I usually watch his newscasts after the fact

Sargon has confirmed it

SARGON HAS CONFIRMED IT

*a a a a a g g g g g g h h h*

don't worry

he'll forget it again by the next newscast

crap, I missed it.

timestamp?

AdamKind

Really triggers them

So, how long until Sargon is forced to give his talk on British identity in the United States? <:thronk:441701565607444482>

After all, wasn't one of the reasons he chose Scarborough in order to make deplatforming less likely? Or am I remembering that backwards?

Actually, he might legitimately be able to file for asylum in the United States due to political opinion

https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/qualifying-asylum-based-persecution-imputed-political-opinion.html

Imputed political opinion at that

e.g. leftists calling him a Nazi or whatnot

What's that pillow(?) he has in the back?

Huh

Or flag

or whatever

Looks kinda kekistani but black and yellow

The Anti-Kommunist Action flag

a parody of the Antifa flag

from a speech?

From a march, I think

Day For Freedom or something

right, right

in hindsight I think I remember it

At least that's about when he got it

the centre of the flag doesn't look like that

but hm

interesting nonetheless

I wanted to hear his talk on British identity, particularly since I submitted a quote that could be used in it from here in the US

So well watching the Sargon stream I noticed that a bunch of people in chat were freaking out about the Tommy Robinson protest something happen?

guessing it's what I posted in <#377519739380957184>

Unless there's been another development since then

Think it was more then that.

It seamed like people were being arrested or somthing.

**[Laughs in American]**

It'll actually be interesting to see which American websites decide "Fuck this" and pull out of the EU outright

`Y O U W O U L D N ' T S T E A L A M E M E`

Sargon's newscast was shit tbh

With any luck this overreach will destroy the EU

I personally think Europe's doomed to be a perpetual powder keg

@Reaps https://youtu.be/_0ByW2d4C0A

The problem with the UK is that the politicians always try to solve secondary issues rather than the root cause of the problem. So we are in this perpetual situation of people basically putting band aids on

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gofvIQ6f4tE

I think the root problem with the UK is its monarchism, a problem intensified by its lack of written constitution

yeah, oldie but a goodie
does he still upload?

actually, last I heard, he got booked for something, ironically enough

@RMS_Gigantic nope, watch the vid

A lot of these secondary "solutions" wouldn't even be legal with something comparable to a Bill of Rights

The problem with politicians is that far too many people have a naive faith in them

a bill of rights that can't simply be undone with a later contradicting law and some "Common Law" interpretation aswith the Communications Act of 2003

@RMS_Gigantic You obviously didn't understand what Douglas said

I agree with Douglas, I just think there's an even deeper and more fundamental problem with the British legal system

@RMS_Gigantic the problem is the politicians, that don't serve the people and we are a small number that support others.

politicians who don't swear allegiance to their citizens or British law

but instead personally swear allegiance to the British monarch

That isn't the problem. That is naive

You just said that the politicians don't serve the people

That's because they're not supposed to

They don't serve the monarch either

Yes, they do

no

```I, (Insert full name), do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria, her heirs and successors, according to law. So help me God.```

Do you think they honour that ?

They don't

The PM certainly does when meeting with the monarch personally every week

gay

@RMS_Gigantic do they meet every week, because I don't think it is that often

they meet when they get sworn in

```The British Prime Minister has a weekly audience with Elizabeth II, usually every Wednesday, during parliamentary time at Buckingham Palace.```

Weekly

Hmmmm

I wonder how much it is observed

because I know Theresa May and David Cameron were slamming corbyn on a wednesday

Looks like they make time after the meeting, because here's David Cameron confirming their weekly nature: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2710855/My-weekly-chats-Queen-help-clear-head-says-Cameron-s-not-sure-gets-it.html

Umm surprising

still doesn't mean anything

The Queen, in turn, only swore an oath to defend the Church of England, if I recall correctly

Do you honestly think any sort of Real Politik works this way?

Thoughts on Anthony Bourdain?

@M4Gunner RIP, God will be getting some tasty steak.

I honestly think the British government works this way, because it does. This is what happens when your nation has no written constitution and a Bill of Rights that can easily be contradicted like any other law.

@RMS_Gigantic You are a fucking idiot then. Each politician has their own ideals, they don't suddenly meet the queen and after 40 odd years of being in politics think "the Crown and the realm"

The UK is not a republic

For all intents and purposes, it is. The monarchy has no _de facto_ power.

She has shitloads of de jure power, however.

@RMS_Gigantic if she did there would be a big fucking problem. That is only supposed to be used in times of war

She also has massive amounts of "soft power" in the form of subtle gestures of approval or disapproval

Nah, she's literally above UK law

UK law comes from her

@RMS_Gigantic Magna Carta dickhead

She is the source of legitimacy under the UK system

hence the difference between subjects and citizens

GROAN

The lords are more of a problem than the Royal Family

the Royal Family are for getting American Tourists in

Hold on, lemme dig up Tim Pool's interview with a UK lawyer who testifies that the Magna Carta doesn't mean shit today

because it, like any other law, can be overwritten by newer legislative sessions

@RMS_Gigantic Tim Pool is another idiot, he couldn't even say "Row" correctly in the context of an argument. I am not going to believe anything he says

This isn't something he said, this is something a UK lawyer said

in response to Tim Pool asking about the Magna Carta

@RMS_Gigantic I don't believe any information coming from him any more, if he can't command simple English ... I can't trust anything else he says

and it isn't like a Vee cockup where it is obviously someone that speaks another language first and uses the wrong tense or something. It was him being a fucking moron.

Once again, this was a video interview where this lawyer was speaking directly to the audience

not some second-hand retelling by Pool

@RMS_Gigantic don't trust his choice of lawyer

This is one of the most ridiculous conversations I have ever seen on Discord

@RMS_Gigantic a person has to make a value judgement and once a guy makes 3 or 4 mistakes that are moronic, I can't trust the guy.

Well it's about the best option I have because the UK legal system is so fucked up on a fundamental level that it takes a UK lawyer to figure out what takes precedence over what

Nothing means anything

words don't mean anything

@MuChaDo you are free to look away

From my point of view the jedi are evil

Then you are lost

@King Canuck That is what Anakin thought

**duel of the fates intensifies**

@RMS_Gigantic do you think that whoever Tim Pool got was the best thinker on it?

Someone needs to buy Tim Pool some fucking clothes

he only seems to have the one outfit

🦉

I somehow have a small long-distance-crush on his co-host.

Emily or something.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

needs more air time.

@Deleted User What she said seemed consistent with the way UK law works in all other respects

The Communications Act of 2003 clashes against the Human Rights Act of 1998

The Human Rights Act of 1998 clashes with the Malicious Communications Act of 1980

etc.

@RMS_Gigantic It was a woman as well ... 🚎

@RMS_Gigantic I just don't trust anything from Tim Pool

Why not?

@RMS_Gigantic I never will, he is the idiot that things hacking something is like using a CD as a table mat

What?

Oh, the reubin interview

Praise jdm

@King Canuck what he said was fucking retarded

Hacking means being able to come up with alternative ways of thinking and solving problems.

What, that "hacking" can constitute using anything and putting it to a purpose it wasn't made for?

I personally thought it was an interesting take on the idea

You can be a garden hacker.

🎩
🦉

that is a very dapper owl

@Deleted User sorry nope.

I think it makes sense

@Deleted User yes

Nope

@Deleted User I think so

@Deleted User Yes, it is even defined this way in the Chaos Computer Club.

Nope, hacking means something specific to the electronics and computer science scene

Hell, let me make this case, then, to prove how the Magna Carta is, as stated, no stronger than any other easily reversed British law:

@Deleted User Don't care about them

Only three clauses from it remain on statute in England and Wales

@Deleted User Yeah, because they would disassemble you for being a MS fanboy.

@Deleted User except I donate to OpenBSD, I am more of an OpenBSD fanboy than MS

If you must, Luke, non-computer hacking is just LifeHacking

"The original definition of the term "hack" is "to cut with rough or heavy blows." In the modern vernacular it has often been used to describe an inelegant but effective solution to a specific computing problem, such as quick-and-dirty shell scripts and other command line utilities that filtered, munged and processed data streams like e-mail and RSS feeds.[1][2] The term was later extended to life hack, in reference to a solution to a problem unrelated to computers that might occur in a programmer's everyday life. Examples of these types of life hacks might include utilities to synchronize files, track tasks, remind oneself of events, or filter e-mail."

it is only the biggest hacker club in Europe. They don't know shit.

And I have problems with them.

@King Canuck in terms of modern tech nobody uses those terms.

But thats beside.

What do you mean?

I've heard of 'hacking' by twisting paperclips into coils to keep several cables bound more cleanly into a single bundle

(which saved me headache...(

Cetronious admitted being a robot

lol

Yep

Hacking is also used by many Open Source communities for describing simply solving issues

@Deleted User yes, that is why there is hackathons in the OpenBSD community.

In almost all modern parlance it means something to do with electronics + making it do something different.

But backing the h*ck up

Tim Pool's definition was so broad that technically I've hacked my macbook to be a beer coaster

@Deleted User open yourself up. It can also be outside of IT.

the only good use for a macbook, frankly

how does this mean tim pool is bad, if he did one too-broad definition?

It was such a dumb definition It meant nothing

This would be hack, if you would be able to do that,

did I hack the piece of paper for using at as a place mat for my coffee. It was a dumb definition.

it is the original one.

It's also possible he was dumbing things down for reubin

@Deleted User yeah it can be, I've done it on bicycles. But it called something else in that community. It is called a "bodge"

The only true one. Not the hollywood definition of it.

So as I said, there were two things and then he advertised without making a disclosure or making it was obvious ... so fuck him

This was bad of him, I agree.

I watched the video, and thought, Tim you are better than this.

Then there was his spaz out when he got his beanie stolen

Do you guys know the network behind?

the guy is a fucking idiot.

Bearing, Roaming Millenial, and Tim have the same ads.

Well he seems to like his beanie a lot

@Deleted User nope this was before that

yeah, do you think, he sleeps with it?

@Deleted User he literally did a video with a title of something else and made it an advert

yes, I remember.

So as I said I can't trust the guy.

I was disappointed. It was something with IT security, am I wrong?

@Deleted User I think so, IIRC

His fans called him out for that in the comments.

@Deleted User yep I am sure they did. But he has done 4 or 5 things that make me think he is untrustworthy or a fucking moron. So I pay zero attention to him.

You have high standards, Luke-san.

You seem to lower them for Microsoft, tho.

@Deleted User no I don't

<:ohsargon:451135765368274954>

@Deleted User please tell me when

You develop .NET, nuff said.

@Deleted User "not an argument" -- Stephan Molyneux

@Deleted User any actual arguments?

.NET meets your high standard?

I use programming languages and frameworks that get me stuff done. .NET is one of those.

sure.

I really like using Flask which is python micro framework

Python Flask?

yup

Damn, you have low standards.

<:gay:382982146249326612>

@Deleted User what is wrong with it?

It is an example in one of our University security lectures about how to not do it.

An exercise is how to hack the rendering engine of Flask.

Seems to be easy.

@Deleted User one of your university lecturers ...

hackerman

I did not attend them. I friend did.

@Deleted User yeah I have zero respect for anyone that isn't from the industry

I am not a security guy.

@Deleted User what rendering engine did he mention?

Use ReactJs for fuck sake.

@Deleted User what rendering engine did the uni professor mention?

@Deleted User I don't know, I would have to ask him.

@Deleted User so you don't know. So you are basically trying to troll?

I was not in the course, it is a master course in the security module.

@Deleted User again you don't know, so I can dismiss that complaint as you have no evidence for it?

ok, @Deleted User. Be happy with Python flask.

@Deleted User what is the problem. If there is such a problem with it you should be able to list at least one fucking problem

@Deleted User Trust you me, dont contintue this conversation.

@EmEm I moved it into Comp-sci

Ah

Well i dont complain about it being here, it just seems like a half assed trolling attemt from one part

.NET is so good, the London Stock Exchange migrated to it, Microsoft made sure everyone knew that.
Then a year later they dumped it and migrated to Linux and C++ because it was a steaming pile of shit; and Microsoft didn't tell anyone that.

@EmEm that is what I thought as well after the first few attempts at trying to get an emotional reaction out of me.

@DanielKO the version of .NET they used was .NET 1.1 which was shit and was also 15 years ago. Tell me what version of what software stack was shite compared to today that was 15 years ago.

It is used by people like yourselves as some sort of gotcha 15 years after the event. Even though .NET is completely different now and a huge number of things you use are using it in the background.

@EmEm why are you on my ass all the time?