who will do whatever he says due to patron client morality

and military chain of command

My ideal models for Monarchy and an Aristocratic societies are

Imperial Russia

Imperial Japan

Victorian Britain

what era of imperial japan?

Vedic India

from 19th century onwards

there are different eras wthin the 20th century

as imperial japan started as an oligarchy

and jus was an empire on paper

It was always technically an oligarchy

but for the 19th century it was an actual oligarchy

It drifted towards militarism which was still OK

the militarism killed the empire

Japanese were ruled by cold steel reason

nukes killed the empire

nobody could predict that

no they were already losing

they predicted they would lose

read the actual documents

Yes but USA lost 50k people invadinga small coral island

no way mainland japan was to be invaded

the japanese army and navy both predicted they would lose regardless of the USA

hmmm

in the 1930s

not 50k, some smaller number

still

then they just predicted teh other sides plan would lose

Well I do agree that Japanese would reach a stalemate with the Chinese even without USA

But then again, Japan needed only to decisivelly defeat USA navy which it could do but failed

That's the whole point, that's why they struck Dutch and British over there and menanced the seas

They knew they could not stand against millions and millions on land

@The Enlightened Shepherd CONSIDER EDWARDIAN ENGLAND INSTEAD

MY MODELS INCLUDE PRE-ROMAN GERMANIC SOCIETIES AND MIDDLE AGES WESTERN EUROPE

pre-roman germanic and celtic societies were cool

Some were fiercely isolationist

funny how films always portray them as some sort of egalitarian pagan tree hugging village societies

when in reality they were basically kingdoms, patriarchal, hard working

@diversity_is_racism HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE ❤

HOLY ROMAN EMPIRE HAD ITS BENEFITS

EMPIRE IS DIFFICULT

BUT I AGREE ON THEIR ISOLATIONISM

THE WAY MONARCHIES MAKE ALLIANCES IS THROUGH MARRIAGES

THEY WERE FAR FROM EGALITARIAN, THESE SOCIETIES

THEY WERE MUCH MORE REALISTIC THAN THAT

INCLUDING A REFUSAL TO LEAVE BEHIND DOCUMENTS

It's remarkable

Considering their small size

That they were persistently able to raise large armies

Reminds me of my country during glorious ages when we had 200.000 populaton total, and raised 40.000 men against Austria

Caesar sodomized Gauls and Germans though, but then again, Caesar was crazy

Well every Freeman was a warrior they basically mobilized the entire adult male population for war

in pop culture everything is simplified

but these men were serious warriors and their armies were not a bunch of know-nothings

sure, they lacked drill, structure and superior logistics that romans knew

and i also dare to say, they lacked the crazy boldness and adventurous unscrupulous conquering unsatiable spirit of the Romans

But the image of bare chested berserking axeman that films portraz

even if it did exist, it existed purely for tactical reasons

these men approached combat and strategy seriously, these gauls and germans

There was definetly a cultural component in the way that they thought, the berserk style showed defiance of death gave prestige and status as a fearless soldier

those styles of battle were incorporated in their style of combat they knew that they couldnt beat the romans on the open field and prefered to ambush them in their territory example teuteburger wald

Roman sense of unshakeable superiority was remarkable

I mean they persistently defeated Germans, first Marius, then Caesar then Germanicus

They won some battles but they were never able to conquer them

Yes but they enslaved many hundred thousands which was basically the same

Rome was then again, something special

It's the spirit of people confident in their superiority

Just reading on Caesars adventures in Britain clearly shows this

It was a pure madness and defiance, no stateman or leader or anybody of the time would attempt something so at a glance futile and irrational, but again, daring and bold

This is something "simple" societies will never achieve or produce

fucking savage https://i.redd.it/y7qwqtk2aivy.jpg

lol pwnt

im using that one

I got that from here, tons of funny shit on there https://www.reddit.com/r/indianpeoplefacebook/comments/698d8e/straight_ass_savage/

for fucks sake the lack of self awareness here https://i.redd.it/evztfelqkjvy.png

shitlibs know the score but always try to lie about it, occasionally they are so incompetent they accidentally tell the truth

ready 4 rally

wear a hockey jersey

liek the hanson brothers

heh

i don't have one

i'll be wearing a different shirt tho

http://www.deathmetal.org/article/dream-theater-are-pop-not-progressive/

gotta get a minnesota hockey jersey man. 90s rapper / slapshot style

in case there's a fight

aluminium foil in mittens

http://www.deathmetal.org/article/onward-to-golgotha-the-deepest-death-metal/

awesome article @Death Strike's Bat

that album cant get enough praise IMO

will always be one of my favorites

next to nespithe, which coincidentally was also mentioned in there

GREAT ARTICLE @Death Strike's Bat

REALLY DIGS INTO WHY THAT ALBUM IS SUCH A FAVORITE

http://www.tobaccoreviews.com/blend/1026#review93708

lol

hahahahaha

Cool article. I listened to Nespithe yesterday, unrelatedly.

THE WEST IS DYING OF AIDS

PINK, FROTHY AIDS

sad!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yX-T8SvcGq8

confirmed pleb

WHERE ELSE DO YOU THINK METAL SOURCES IT'S TALENTS FROM

finished recording modular

crazy noises

Someone is mad I said modulate 4 times I'm the dream theater rant.

Like that's their problem.

If they stayed in key, it would be listenable pop music.

Like aerosnith if they were gay

So Styx who are aerosmith + hiv

Pls translate

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modulation_(music)

Is altright pro-vegan or no?

Or vegetarian I should say

Hey

Shut it down

The Goys know

lol

@OJneg who knows what the alt lite is.

Veganism is retarded.

As you will die.

Vegan ism is definitely done

Dumb*

gay mystical nazis are pro vegan

Right? Haha

I'm just wondering how many guys are pro vegan for naturalistic or stoic reasons

hello

SODOMIZE

THE WEAK

The naturalistic or stoic principle would more reasonably lead you to eat locally / hunt / homestead your own food since you're living more within the natural cycle and in accordance with your biology

If I actually believed in any sort of validity in philosophy I'd likely be a stoic

I love doing things for myself

Alt right is pro meat

I'm not alt right

It is "spiritually damaging to not eat meat", but not to life off of an industry that breeds weakness in a pool of filth

MEAT SHOULD BE MORE EXPENSIVE

AND HOUSING/TAXES LESS

THE CHEAP MEAT INDUSTRY HAS DUBIOUS PRACTICES

THIS IS WHY I DO NOT PURCHASE MEAT FROM MOST SOURCES

Hunting is the only acceptable way to eat meat

HUNTING HUMANS

I only eat vegan humans, unless they consume too much soy product

diversity_is_racism - Today at 5:53 PM
HUNTING HUMANS

We can feed the poor with the flesh of executed criminals and enemies

WE COULD ALSO FEED MOST PEOPLE TO PIGS

PIGS ARE VERY USEFUL ANIMALS

https://richardjohnmoult.bandcamp.com/album/songs-2

http://www.prometheism.net/

http://www.euvolution.com/

I eat koreans

@Kalvin , you are invited to a room about "Leary, Hofmann. any psychology, altered consciousness, spirituality, alchemy, chemistry, drug talk, war stories, anything cool, awesomeness.". Do you want to join?

I speak on the founder's behalf

No

Though incidentally

... ... ...

. . . . . . . . .

Today I learned that pig farmers jack off pigs to get their sperm

wow

Your pork chops come from a human jacking off a pig

there you have it, folks

That sounds terrible

But listen to this:

https://youtu.be/6n2mT0tFRpk

Hey Mother

im here for the blackpill

SODOMIZE

THE WEAK

@diversity_is_racism I'm not a bleeding-heart at all. I'm pro-hunting for example., It just seems much more ethical to eat a wild animal that has lived its whole life outside of a cage.

But yeah, very much agree with the sentiment. I just don't know who is putting what into the food supply.

Hunting is an inescapable part of nature. If you need the food to live, of course you should hunt, as any predator does

But meat factories are not the same as hunting. One wants to bread weakness and stupidity, the other selects for the opposite

There is no conflict in the meat factory, it is rigged from the beginning. Deft and dull alike are bred in a filthy cage and killed

Sodomy is a dumb meme, it is not good to sodomize the weak. Sodomizing the weak is a disgraceful way to enjoy oneself. The weak should be killed and their corpses used as fertilizer, not used for ugly sexual pleasure

@Hagel "SODOMIZE" MAY BE METAPHORICAL

NO PROMISES THOUGH

Of course

I hope that you only use it because it was in some good grindcore

@OJneg I TEND TO AGREE, AND TAKE A MIDDLE PATH TOO

AN ANIMAL ON A DECENT FARM HAS A REASONABLE LIFE

Because it is not a metaphor for killing in cold blood, it is a metaphor for sadistic pleasure

IN MY VIEW, IT IS SEXUAL PUNISHMENT THROUGH EMOTIONAL SUBJUGATION

SIMILAR TO THE IDEA OF "BREAKING" SOMEONE

VERY PRISON SEX

None of that is good, it is quite degenerate in all actuality

MY PROBLEM WITH FACTORY FARMING IS THAT IT IS CRUEL AND ENABLES HUGE POPULATION GROWTH

LOTS OF CHEAP MEAT FOR IDIOTS

WHERE KEEPING THINGS ON A CELLULAR SCALE WORKS BETTER

SMALL TOWNS OR CITIES, SMALL FARMS, REASONABLE LIVING

Criminals should not be punished with sadistic glee. They should be removed with righteous conviction

IF I HAD TO SODOMIZE THE WEAK, I WOULD INVENT A SADISTIC SEXBOT TO DO IT

WITH A 15" PENIS

THAT SQUIRTS TABASCO SAUCE

IN THEORY, I AGREE

EXILE

IS THE JUSTICE THE KINGS FAVORED

I would not even rape the women of my conquered enemies

but I might kill them, to prevent breeding

THE PROBLEM IS THAT THEN YOU CREATE A HERD OF WEAK PEOPLE OUTSIDE YOUR SOCIETY

SO MAYBE STERILIZATION OR KILLING IS CORRECT

FEED THEM TO THE PIGS

Today of course you can sterilize

so there would be no need for that, I suppose

I have been looking into sterilization methods

THEN YOU CREATE RESENTFUL PEOPLE

there are some excellent ones with no side effects

YOU WOULD HAVE TO REMOVE THE SEX ORGANS

TESTES AND OVARIES

SO IT COULD NOT BE UNDONE

BUT EXILE TO BRAZIL MIGHT BE PERMANENT

I think that muslms in Sweden should choose sterilizsation or repatriation

Including white converts

REPATRIATION IS THE USEFUL GOAL THERE

AND THEN EXILE FOR WHITE DEGENERATES

they can live in a muslim shithole with their bretheren if they want that path

INCLUDING ANY WHO CONVERT

FREE PLANE TICKETS TO SODOMYISTAN

White converts always go full jihad or full cuck

Probably because those are the two mindsets that can lead one to adopting islam as a European

RATIONALIZATION

THEY WANT A REASON TO KEEP ON NOT CHANGING

THAT IS THE REAL GOAL OF LEFTISM: NO ONE NEEDS TO CHANGE

At a very deep level, too

In their very souls

THIS IS WHERE ALL REALLY IMPORTANT DECISIONS ARE MADE

They do not want to bear the existential weight of scientific racism, of natural inequality even at the individual level, of true evil existing in the world

FEAR HAS TAKEN THEIR SOULS

Of the necessity of conflcit, the nature of nature, and violence

THIS IS THE ACTUAL TARGET: "natural inequality even at the individual level"

And the reason, is actually

THE INDIVIDUALIST WANTS TO NEVER BE WRONG

that if they did have to bear that, they would crumble into genocidal monsters

"Well, if they really do have 85 IQ, I guess we have to kill them all"

they can not see any other way

so it has to be false

IGNORING THE MIDDLE PATH

"THEY ARE DIFFERENT GROUP, THEREFORE THEY BELONG ELSEWHERE"

IF WE CUT OUR CIVIL RIGHTS AND WELFARE PROGRAMS, WE WOULD BE MONOETHNIC AGAIN

Well

GOVERNMENT IS AN INFERIOR METHOD OF CIVILIZATION

People come to Europe because Europe thrived

IT REMOVES RESPONSIBILITY FROM THE INDIVIDUAL

Europe should still thrive, but they should not invite every one

IF THEY ARE NOT GIVEN A GUARANTEED PLACE AT THAT TABLE, THEY WILL NOT COME

Indeed

IF DISCRIMINATION BECOMES LEGAL AGAIN, GOODBYE OTHER GROUPS

NO WELFARE = NO PARASITES