Pretty much like Christian vs shitbag memes too

@Deleted User It’s amazing how much we’ve all been misled about history. Were you taught any of the stuff you mentioned (wakanda channel), or just personal research?

Some of it from school, mostly personal research, and then when I got to college

Despite colleges usually being the vanguard of the left, mine was quite different

All I heard up until that point...slavery was bad mkay, north fight against slavery, etc

Then no shit my college history textbooks were all blaming the Democrats for slavery

Always had a love for history. It is the life lessons of the individual, but for the entire world, for kings and nations to follow

And it sent me so far to the right, I could not have gone further right if I had been launched with a catapult

History is a valuable lesson to learn. As it shows you how the cycle of our world works.

Ouch

When you can't take a selfie without your husband's permission.

Look Im all for Inquisitions murdering people but that many before the 1800 is literally impossible

well you have people believe in the 6gorillion so you can't help it

Killing relapsed heretics preaching suicide, infanticide, homosexuality etc is not murder

👍🏻

I need

Please share a link if you find one lol

Cathars and Albeginsians are the same people. And they are not Christians. They taught infanticide, suicide, euthanasia etc

Sack of Constantinople wasn't until the 4th Crusade and resulted in excommunication by the Pope of everyone involved

30 Years War had nothing to do with crusaders, knights etc and didn't even happen in the middle ages. Had everything to do with Lutheran rebels

I bet the reddit neck beard thought that was a clever meme.

The war in Spain lasted several centuries and it was actually easier and cheaper to keep the occupied territories as tributary states paying gold to the Christians, until we could afford the Reconquista. In short, the Moors paid the Christians not to attack them, and the Christians eventually saved up enough tribute to attack them.

Teutonic vs Poland aside, most of the Teutonic Crusades were against pagans who sacrificed children, enslaved women, etc pretty much like the Muslims and the American Natives

Vast majority of the Crusades were fought in the Holy Land, not in Europe, making your shitty ass leftist degenerate meme unfounded

My closing argument is that if you actually believe anything in that garbage meme, you are a communist, leftist, faggot, nigga, degenerate, enemy of civilization and should be burned to death. And most certainly don't belong here.

The Mongols didn't eliminate the Muslims anyway. Many of then actually were Muslim. Prior to that, they were allies of the Christians and many believed they were in fact the fulfillment of a prophecy that a far eastern Christian king would come to aid Europe. That would be Nestorian which many early Mongol rulers were.

If they had really defeated the Muslim empire, the Ottoman Empire would not have lasted into the 20th century.

Teutonic crusades were not bout conversion

more like destruction overall

since the teutons also attacked the Poles, who invited them to Prussia in the first place.

Also, take every medieval source about paganism with a heavy grain of salt.

and the chronicles of for example Peter of Duisburg, are incomplete, since the writer himself stated that he refused to write about some events during the prussian conquests.

Also the teutons themselves did some pretty stupid shit.

example: during the Great Prussian Uprising, one teuton castle was besieged by the prussian coalition. They were pretty fucked. but they had some hostages. Guess what they did.

they hanged the hostages, pissing off the besiegers more.

I do wonder what woudl've happened if the Lithuanian-Polish coalition had taken the castles of the Teutons after the Battle of Grunwald.

another proof of teutonic bullshit is, that they've still attacked the former pagan parts of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, after the baptism of 1387.
But to be fair, due to infrastructure issues Christianity didn't became a dominating religion up untill mid 16th century.

and speaking of, The Grand Duchy was a multireligious state, but there were no religion based civil wars inside of it.
Now sadly I think, this is where all the leftist loons got their ideas of a "diverse" society, but I may be giving them way too much credit, since all they read is Harry Tosser and the Retard Wizard Posse.

Nothing wrong with destroying pagans and it's pretty well accepted that all pagans were barbaric. The Germanic pagans though converted peacefully for the most part

Teutons converted shit.

Lithuania receive Christianity from Poland.

which was an even bigger "fuck you" to the order.

Remember that this order was told to fuck off from both the Middle East and Hungary.

until Conrad of Mazovia invited them to fight the Prussians.

Which also backfired on his people too.

The only ones doing a bit of conversion to Christianity were the Livonian Order ( or Brothers of the Sword)

but they too were set on conquest, but got rekt hard, in 1253 and 1260 respectivelly, and never fully recovered.

And once Teutons themselves reformed their state into the Lutheran Prussia, their last Grand Master swore to Lithuanian-Polish King Sigismund the Old.

The whole eastern Crusades did lasted long, but they only achieved in exterminating the old prussian tribes, but even those fought back ,and fought back quite hard before being eventually overwhelmed.

Actually the Eastern Crusade lasted longer than the 100 year war between Brits and French.

They also had some campaigns against the Orthodox christians, namely the lands of Pskov and Novgorod.

And notice how I don't fully defend the old baltic faith. Reason is, very few reliable sources exist. That and our neo-pagan community is full of shit, just "balticising" Catholic and Celtic Druid rituals, whilst charging outrageous sums of money for example, weddings.

There are accounts of human sacrifice, as is in every pagan faith. Again, few trully objective and reliable sources exists, to fully detail it. fucking vikings got it lucky.

To be fair, all religion is cancer that prevents Humanity from leaping further and believing in the one true being that can actually do something to save it: Humanity itself

Sagif that leads to existentialism because 'naturalism' is too tough of a philosophy for most. Existentialism leads to Communism, as Jean-Paul Sartre was one. Existentialism leads to the belief that meaning and morals are subjective, and moral subjectivity leads to progressivism and degeneracy.

Religion is necessary for the heartfelt, and naturalism is necessary for the jaded. I am jaded.

Religion is a necessary evil to keep society stable, because Western society was built on religion, as were most societies. The reverse that you would need a revolution, and that is what we are seeing today. The revolt against the establishment of society. These are anarcho-communists. (Neo-Communists) filled to the brim with marxist drivel.

Religion is necessary. That, or strict adherence to natural behavior.

Saying that Existentialism leads to Communism makes as much sense as saying that believing in God leads to Catholicism, which in turn leads to pedophilia, since there are so many cases of it.

And morals are subjective, both in time and space. What you might find reasonable and acceptable, someone else, at the same time, will find them abhorrent and ludicrous in another place of the world. What you believe to be right is not set in stone. Society's values and morals are defined by the majority of its own population.

Religion is the scapegoat of those that are too weak to face that the only entity responsible for their own fate is themselves. There is no "invisible hand" guiding you, its you and only you.
All the horrible things that happen to you is not a "punishment from God", or a "test", its consequences from your own actions and of those around you. All the good things as well.

Blindly believing in God and the Bible (or Quran, or whatever), means that your mind is bound. You are not free. You refuse to see the answers because they either frighten you, or you just cant understand them.

"Thunder strikes", it means that there was an environmental action that lead to that event.
Religion, however, suggests that it was Thor, smiting his hammers, or God, showing his anger towards men.

Not all Christians believe that they are not in control of their own destiny

We aren't all Calvinists

Believing in a higher power does not restrict your mind. Disbelief does, because people like you just absolutely refuse to consider the possibility that you might be wrong.

I don't recall reading anything about lightning as God's wrath in the mountains of historical texts of the Church that I have read.

I'm sorry for refusing to believe in something that has no proof to sustain it.

"we are all descendants from Adam and Eve and the world is thousands of years old" -> false and disproved
"the entire Noah's Arc storyline" -> false and disproved
And the list goes on

False and disproved if you’re retarded and can’t read the actual scientific evidence.

Carbon dating, which is used for your gorillions of years, when objectively looked at is bullshit.

It makes far too many assumptions and turns far too many variables into constants.

False and disproved in your own mind, as for the scientific community there is nothing to disprove it

Because the "we are all inbred children of a man and a woman" alternative is much better

Is that not what evolution teaches?

Carbon dating assumes that there’s never been earthquakes, never been volcanic eruptions, and the sun has never changed it’s radiation output.

How does it teach that?

Common ancestor

You do realize it isnt just **one**, right?

So two people had to randomly evolve in the same species?

Evolution teaches that you’re the “retard baby of a another retard mutant fish” to quote Mr. Garrison 🤣

Common ancestors are easily disproven with a mediocre knowledge of genetics.

Its a process of millions of years, it doesnt happen like in the Bible

Its not 2 random animals saying: we are the same, lets create a new species

Millions of years = a long long time ago, like a fairytale or Star Wars

lol

Life does not arise from nonlife

>Trying to defend god
>Calling someone who believes in Science "fairy tales"
>smh

The actual science of genetic study shows that all species have been what they are now. A wolf/dog has always been a wolf/dog.

???

What?

Where is that taught? In Bible studies?

We have fossils of so many different ancient species, some existing to the present day. Yet no fossil of the common ancestor

What I said? In the actual research.

You realize how fossils work?