https://books.google.it/books?id=lM3ECwAAQBAJ&pg=PA100&lpg=PA100&dq=#v=onepage&q&f=false

Also I’m neither British nor American. This is just the most serious canal for discussions, so far.

EAT ASS

The future is too important to be left to individualism.

hi

Chopin it's time to establish a revolutionary base in Australia

I think the real challenge we face today is to combine individuality (not individualism) and the collective needs. We just can't return to the supremacy of the herd.

False dichotomy. The two are the same.

https://www.marxist.com/what-is-dialectical-materialism.htm

Only two genders

Deleuze seems more radically anarchist than stirner

Only two classes.

😄

The bourgeois scum and the working class

I think you nailed it

what do you do when the gulag is too far away?

execution van

I like it. We could turn the company down the street that makes tanks into an execution bus company

>we
I follow a consistent insecurity amongst libertarians that s afraid of *not* being apart of the dominant crowd. Don't worry be have a solution to your problem. The end of class conflict is called Communism. But you have to read about it first. Knee-jerk is not tolerated. This is a community which runs on literacy.

Isn't libertarian just another word for Nazi?

synonymous with "western degenerate"

Being a part of a group of people is different from a government

I don't think being libertarian means you're refusing to be part of a dominant group, just that that group shouldn't to an extreme extent impose its will on you, as I feel the current government has or in on the road towards

plus i'm not particularly against there being different classes, if the possibility is there for you to progress towards a higher class it's good.

And there's where I and socialists differ, how do you get as many people into the higher classes

>end of class struggle

lmao

People do not become happy because they have a lot of wealth, they become happy when there is upwards mobility.
Good grounds on to not spoil your children when they're young, it handicaps them in a way I think

I agree just don't think communism would fix it

neither do all forms of socialism because foreigners fuck that up every time

Then again, any form of government can work if it's authoritarian enough. libertarianism is worst.

guys

get in the discord

im bored

as fuck

get in marxist talks

ye little nigres

authoritarian and totalitarian however

A welfare state with open borders is the dumbest idea of all, it always attracts the least productive immigrants, and who can blame them?

Immigration was very good for countries when the social safety net was limited, because it meant they came with one reason only: to work their way to the middle or top

Yep, but them programs thoooo

oh yeah massively successful in decreasing poverty(not)

Read up on what a success the war on poverty was

Hol up lemme take a guess

not at all

As with most social policies

Now I'm not against a safety net, but not as much as they are now

How about a state that pays for certain utilities

Which utilities?

such as water and heating

I'm not for privatizing such common and essential goods

The environment is a crucial issue most libertarians gloss over

how about electric heating?

Less so, i'm more for subsidizing people to create their own green energy and reduce what my country has now, the subsidizing to make it affordable

We had a program which subsidized solar panels, don't mind that really

solar panels are quite impractical

geothermal is niche

they're getting better and better

And everyone has a roof basically

yes, but they are expensive and there is limited graphite

it's almost a waste of money

solar panels were a great idea, but the output just isn't enough for what it's worth

They also get less expensive, that's why I was against doing it 10 years ago, the technology was not great and you hardly made a profit, especially if you bought one 3 years ago, you saved good money

Now there's always the question when do you decide to get them, maybe they'll be even better 5 years later but from what I know they can get a lot of energy right now

solar panels are not a practical means to solve the energy problem because they don't pay for themselves quick enough, and that there isn't nearly enough materials to manufacture them on this planet to suit the needs of the masses

I have nothing against research into green energy, but solar panels are not the answer

Oh i know there's an issue where they might cause a whole lot of damage when just making them

but it's clear it's economically viable now

viable if you want to make a poor investment

Depends where you live obviously but it's not a stupid investment

lol

For europeans maybe more so, we have to deal with Russia threatening to shut the gas pipes, maybe not a devastating measure but it will run your bill up

...you should be more worried about Iran if you want to talk oil

in either case, both of them should "shut the pipes", perhaps the western governments will frantically fund research into alternative energy sources and discover something.

Yeah, I don't like to be reliant on those type of regimes, and generating your own will give you more freedom

i get sick when I see my ''leaders'' buddying up with Saudi Arabia

lol. Saudis are powerless.

they only have power because the West chooses to buy from them.

Power still though

they are a one trick pony though

once the barrel sinks, so do they.

They get to run ravage on Yemen, not a peep from my government

Iran could cut off the strait of hormuz and cause oil prices to skyrocket in just two days

this alone would destroy SA

that strait sees more than 50% of the world's oil traffic passing through it btw

More reason to become energy independent, I don't want to fund them

this is why the Saudis are funding wars against the Yemenis

they want control of their strait.

interestingly as well, the Chinese government is fighting Vietnam over oil in the South China Sea.

a dirty business

You are not thinking big enough. The first goal of Communism will be the creation of a Dyson Sphere.

@WhitakerWhitman NIGGER WTF

what did he post?

a tranny op

We should try and use fusion, ASAP. For now, all we've got in that department is fission, but that's not bad.

what do you know about it?

because I don't know anything about that

Basically? Think nuclear power, but more efficient and safer. Only problem: We haven't quite gotten it *working* yet, but from what I understand, this isn't because the *physics* rules it out, but because we haven't figured out how to do it right yet.