Human nature changes over time, and humanity, being a rational being, ought to control his own nature for the better. A strong state is the perfect apparatus for this, and in doing so would create a future human far in advance of naturalist who falsely assume it so be static or otherwise sacred in some way. Indeed Socialism is the perfected of man because only this kind of apparatus is objective about the best parts of the human condition, and not subject to primitive ideals like ethnocentrism or bias in group preferances.

The state is not the path to salvation, the individual is

"The individual himself is still the most recent invention.
For many generations, being separated from the herd was a punishment and guilt was acting not in accord with its interests."
(Friedrich Nietzsche)

https://books.google.it/books?id=lM3ECwAAQBAJ&pg=PA100&lpg=PA100&dq=#v=onepage&q&f=false

Also I’m neither British nor American. This is just the most serious canal for discussions, so far.

EAT ASS

The future is too important to be left to individualism.

hi

Chopin it's time to establish a revolutionary base in Australia

I think the real challenge we face today is to combine individuality (not individualism) and the collective needs. We just can't return to the supremacy of the herd.

False dichotomy. The two are the same.

https://www.marxist.com/what-is-dialectical-materialism.htm

Only two genders

Deleuze seems more radically anarchist than stirner

Only two classes.

😄

The bourgeois scum and the working class

I think you nailed it

what do you do when the gulag is too far away?

execution van

I like it. We could turn the company down the street that makes tanks into an execution bus company

>we
I follow a consistent insecurity amongst libertarians that s afraid of *not* being apart of the dominant crowd. Don't worry be have a solution to your problem. The end of class conflict is called Communism. But you have to read about it first. Knee-jerk is not tolerated. This is a community which runs on literacy.

Isn't libertarian just another word for Nazi?

synonymous with "western degenerate"

Being a part of a group of people is different from a government

I don't think being libertarian means you're refusing to be part of a dominant group, just that that group shouldn't to an extreme extent impose its will on you, as I feel the current government has or in on the road towards

plus i'm not particularly against there being different classes, if the possibility is there for you to progress towards a higher class it's good.

And there's where I and socialists differ, how do you get as many people into the higher classes

>end of class struggle

lmao

People do not become happy because they have a lot of wealth, they become happy when there is upwards mobility.
Good grounds on to not spoil your children when they're young, it handicaps them in a way I think

I agree just don't think communism would fix it

neither do all forms of socialism because foreigners fuck that up every time

Then again, any form of government can work if it's authoritarian enough. libertarianism is worst.

guys

get in the discord

im bored

as fuck

get in marxist talks

ye little nigres