I mean jesus, you sounded reasonable at first but then you said shit like that.

And not to Cancuun, I mean actually travel.

Any conversation from now on, I'll know the ideology hiding behind your words.

Thanks for revealing yourself early, I guess.

I am reasonable. I never said they couldn't evolve, they simply didn't have to based on seasonal changes, or the lack thereof.

technology is just a tool

Uh-huh.

There is nothing hiding, if you think I'm a supremacist or some nonsense.

Mhm

it doesn't change anything by itself, it depends on how it's used

even if almost everything is done by robots, the increase in production will only benefit the ruling class

Well, then you don't understand Darwinian theory. It's simple evolution, as you yourself pointed out, and you also said all humans weren't created equally, you agreed to this to an extent.

@MrSally

evolutionary, we really haven't changed that much in that amount of time

Africa is pretty fucked up, but if I traveled there, went to a city like Cape Town and talked to a black person, all African all the way back, they would probably be a typical working class person who works every day to get by.

@Deleted User there won't be a bourgeoisie if you kill them all 🤔

I like that thinking 😄

also there have been communist regimes in Africa...

Cape Town? You mean a place settled by whites and holds European society?

they were overthrown by American influence though

@Deleted User angola best country

So black people who live there have evolved just the perfect amount in 400 years?

How about you go to the Congo.

e.g. Thomas Sankara

No, how about you say something that makes sense.

(Burkina Faso)

If I lived in a jungle, I'd probably be pretty fucked up too.

I am, I'm talking about evolution and you exempt human races from that for some reason.

So did the black people in Cape Town just evolve at an accelerated rate for the past 500 years?

No, they were taught to act a certain way because of those in power.

the problem is the relation of Africa and the 3rd world to the 1st world, namely the economic relationship

Okay, so why would you assume it is any different for you?

Now that Mandela took over in the 90's and Zimbabwe lost all its white people, they actually forgot how to farm and are starving. What does that tell you?

African countries export raw materials to the West, which are then manufactured and sold back to them

Are you sure the reason you are the way you are is not because you have been taught to act certain ways by people in power?

It shows that Society is Racial construct, not the other way around.

as well as the waste being sent back as well

Yeah, nothing to say about it.

Mmk.

there's a lack of funds due to having to privatize your entire country if you want loans from the IMF, as well as U.S. and European funds for African dictators and warlords

Africa should be left alone, honestly.

No chance.

Do you realize how much they are sitting on?

As long as currency exists, Africa will be exploited.

it leads to a situation where countries in the area are ruthlessly exploited by warlords in the service of countries and capitalists to the extent that they have no real chance to get anywhere as countries

And yes, we were taught to live a certain way, but we also evolved to live this certain way, many thousands of years ago. While the Romans had aquaducts, the Africans were in mud huts... like they are today. Shaka Zulu invented the Short Spear in the 1880's, the predicesor to the sword. That's proof enough of intellectual evolution.

how China is treating Africa is actually a significant improvement over the past

Brought to you by Capitalism in the First Place

Capitalism is shit tho

Capitalism, in a rampant form, is a plague.

no, capitalism in general is a plague

We need a balance of Socialist and Capitalist policies.

We need nothing from Africa

socialism is the ownership of the means of production by the working class

Capitalism in the First Place®, never a good idea if you want ancient museums of natural history like the entire continent of Africa to be free from exploitation.

capitalism is the theft of surplus value from the owners of capital

the two are mutually exclusive

@Deleted User no, that's communism, different than socialism.

don't be a stupid american

I've actually met people who think "surplus value" is a myth

A CEO making a hundred million a year is not a myth.

the distinction between communism and socialism is very vague and post-dates Marx

what you're thinking of is a welfare state, not socialism

I'm simply saying that Socialism is not having the means of production in the hands of the people, that's communism.

social policies are not the same as socialism

No, that is socialism.

Communism is a stateless classless society characterized by that phenomenon.

With the means of production being in the hands of the people who operate it.

Yes.

Communism is socialistic.

Socialism is not that.

Yes.

socialism is that

it is not a welfare state

Yeah you're thinking of social democracy

Which I don't mind, but it's not socialism.

It's better than capitalism because it forces capital to "care" more.

Agreed, it's not a welfare state, but it also does not abolish classes or put the means of production in the hands of the workers.

Puts people in a better position in their lives.

socialism is the abolition of classes and the means of production in the hands of the workers

That's communism

but in the Leninist narrative, the distinction is if there is a state or not

Communism involves abolition of the state.

Nothing short of it and it's not communism.

If you still have a state, you are not communist.

You're just commies.

Socialism has a state.

It might.

There is stateless socialism.

The very notion of the Social Contract is Statist.

Not at all.

Yes, it's called communism, if there is no state and is socialist.

But I believe in democracy.

Well... there isn't stateless socialism.

I don't believe in democracy.

There is stateless socialism. Anarcho-socialism is a thing that exists.

@Deleted User That's why Communism is a utopian ideal that cannot exist.

all ideals cannot exist

You cannot have anarchy and socialism.

that's why they're called ideals