Marxism simply focuses on the Conflict aspect of human and social interaction, nothing more.

Not at all.

Sir, that is exactly what is specified in Marx's works.

I think he was responding to my question

It revolves around Class Conflict in Industrialized Society. Its offshoot, Feminism, revolves around Conflict of the Sexes.

They won't use their full potential unless they have a sense of urgency.

Cite the passage, please?

The whole book of Das Kapital?

@Deleted User they?

Humanity

That is human nature

Yeah, your name says it all.

@Deleted User this is true

Human nature ranges from loving to asshole.

Kindness isn't motivating

A lot of it is choice.

People don't care about kindness.

Human nature is self-preservation

If you only feel motivated by being an asshole, you are a degenerate.

The nature of life is self preservation

That has nothing to do with anything.

No, Human Nature is to be a predator, anything else is learned from interaction with civilization.

Exactly

Yes, exactly, meaning you are a degenerate on civilization.

Two things on a person's mind is kill or rape

Like a tumor.

I wouldn't say "kill or rape" that's a bit odd.

He's fucking autistic.

You can't work with them, there will always be someone who wants to destroy you

Food, Shelter, Sex.

No

Yes, that's base animalistic psychology.

Ethno National socialists exist everywhere

Exactly

And you shouldn't.

And they're like that

Im not one

Im an anarchist

National Socialism is based in Ethno centrism, no need for redundencies.

But I can identify a problem in an iedology

Why are you espousing their shit then

Any ideology based off kindness will just be met by a psychopath who wants to take advantage of others

Hmmm

Ever thought of being rationally nice?

And he'll take advantage of the weak

I'm not like this

Hold on now, I'm a National Socialist, and I'm trying to act civil here. Infact, the only person here not partaking is shitposting or personal attacks is me; the National Socialist.

Saying sorry after telling someone no?

Ive seen people like that

>Anarchism
>Appealing to Hooman Nature

No, don't worry

He's being a devil's advocate.

He just didn't make that particularly clear.

His picture is literally the devil..

Mean :p

Fairs

Can we just have a @Deleted User vs @MrSally on Marxism

Do it

Anyway, let us continue then.

I don't know very much about Marxism. I was more interested in talks of communism.

Communism is the culmination of Marxism into the Utopian Ideal. I would imagine that one would need to understand the fundemental values that lead to Communism to discuss it. Not trying to sound rude.

I'm somewhat post-Marx because he wasn't right about absolutely everything ever, though his prototranshumanist views on technology and post-scarcity are some of my favorites.

Reading the Communist Manifesto before or without reading Das Kaptial is a bit off, I'd say.

Unless you have a different take on Communism, to which I'd like to hear, sir.

Yes, I understand class conflict and all of that

That all has to happen, and it all is happening.

I hope firefly hasn't been advertising on reddit

I see communism as pretty self-evident. I think advanced technology is all it will take for us to be at that point.

To have a complete utopia where all things are equal?

I don't think it will be possible for the bourgeois or the capitalists to control all of that technology for too long, before people realize they are being bled dry when everything they need to live perfect lives is readily there.

@Deleted User wanna vc in marxist talks and talk about this?

Absolutely, technology is the equalizer.

Elaborate please.

Production technology will reach a point where nobody will ever need anything to survive again.

Food?

And someone will have to produce these items. Unless you are talking about some totally mechanized world where humans subsist in tubes.

Bro we're literally going to have Star Trek-style replicators. This is actually a thing we will have in the future. Food won't be a problem.

But greed will.

Greed won't even be a trait that shows up in humans anymore.

You cannot remove the Nature Factor from a predatory animal.

This is the next stage in our evolution we're talking about here.

Greed will be seen as a defect, and people who have it won't have power.

Who will decide this? And only the most egalitarian few actually possess such selfless traits, you'd need to genocide 90% of mankind.

Unfortunately.

naaaah just kidding, it would probably be more like 10%.

No, it will be like 90%.

The population of completely incurable psychopaths out there is not that big.

It's evolution we're talking about, we evolved as predators.

Into not-predators.

Technology removes the need for stalking our prey for weeks

It turns it into a leisure activity, actually.

You mean White people have. And by White I mean Northern Hemispheric races such as Asians and Europeans, those groups that invented such egalitarian concepts. The Equitorial races are not as evolved, and cannot be any time soon. That's Nature.

They've existed and evolved just as long as we have.

In different ways for differnent purposes, all predatory.

Not even all whites are egalitarian, only the privileged few.

Prove it?

That black people are all predatory?

Go to Africa.

No, prove your shit.

Crime demographics, the Nations in Africa, the actual way of the 3rd world. Have you travelled outside of a white nation?