Totally

He voted for Hilary

And Hitler was a communist

He flew to the US

And got citenship

And voted for Hilary

HOW THE FUCK CAN I VOTE FOR HILLARY IF I AM A BRITBONG

Just explained

You flew to the us

And gained citizens

In the span of what, 3 days?

Yup

I don't think that is feasibly possible laddie.

I'd be too busy voting for Brexit lad

Probably working with the Illuminati too

It is, just buy a fucking plane and chant USA when applying for citzenship

*Majestic 12 actually*

🇺🇸

🇬🇧

USA

TALLY HO

USA

USA

FOR KING AND COUNTRY

Lmao

USA

🇺🇸

This one time we chanted that in a chat

Imagine not living in the US

And a big boi warned us all formir

^

Fornit

For

It

*Imagine living in South Africa*

OOGA BOOGA

You mean Ebola land?

STEAL WHITE PEOPLE FARMS

Kill their children

Is ebola common in SA?

I know AIDs is

why did I say "AIDs"

does that even make sense

what's the difference between AIDS and HIV

"Albert Is Dick sucking"

HIV is the virus and AIDS is something else

oh

HIV is the virus and AIDS is the disease that the virus spread

AIDS is your immune system after HIV has destroyed it

Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome

lol

Ben Shapiro hamburger helper

<#507040801860091914> launched. Big nibba government vs manlet ancap government

hmm

<#507040801860091914> Small dick govt: Less bureaucracy, Big Dick govt: More Stability

No government, just an Army functioning as the sovereign state 😎

Then the hierarchy of the army is the government

That works

Not ebin

Anarcho-Militarism when?

anfash

anan

anarcho anarchism

Anarcho Totalitarianism

Not contradictory

anarcho-fascism is really just national-anarchism and needs more ideological structure to cement it as an actual doctrine since anarcho-fascism could actually work

@Bearer Of The Curse it isn't

What I said

gucci

hugo boss

faggot

nein du

how many books on Anarcho-Fascism there is? I only found one

😊

😳

maybe

@𝕿𝖔𝖙𝖆𝖑𝖎𝖙𝖆𝖗𝖎𝖆𝖓 𝕲𝖗𝖆𝖓𝖉𝖆𝖉𝖉𝖉𝖞 just look up national-anarchist books

they exist

anarcho-fascism is a more radical variant of it, but they share the same political ethos

Anarcho can just mean freedom of association, it's simply making a fascist country from the ground up

Welcome @Orwell

Be sure to check out our <#507040801860091914> and <#521916756852342784>

so uhh

whats this server all about

A gathering place for patriots and even non-patriots to debate/discuss their views

nice

are people here big advocates for fascist governments?

just scrolled up lol

<:boomer:521456245505523712>

🇺🇸 USA🇺🇸

We have a bit of everything by now

hmm

some are fascist, we also have communists

@Bearer Of The Curse What doth thou mean?

its a balancing act

Libertarians, nazbols, fascists, monarchists, everything

interesting

Maybe just not civnats

but they are mostly nationalists no?

Yes

civic nationalists are actually the least common nationalists here funny enough

a growing problem that im seeing now are globalist agendas allowing for open borders in countries in europe

you also have me

😃

its a scary thought that our cultures are disappearing

We have a Prophect, yeah

guys

the solution is simple

I think only maybe the commies are for open borders and even then its the anarchist nonnationalist ones

we should kill the jews

most of the worlds problems will go away

if we kill them

commies or not the politicans are for globalist agendas in the EU

France people arent having it for sure

They are just carrying out the kalergi plan

makes me wonder how many other countries would also leave the EU

globalism/internationalism isn't a new problem for europe

Most, maybe not Germany

i suppose not

its gone back as far as 1917

if they are advocating for globalism then theyre going about it the wrong way

or maybe the right way

depending on their interests

their internationalism is quite the opposite of something proposed by Juche, they seem to think europe should be at the giving end constantly in exchange for essentially nothing

theyve certainly succeeded in giving themselves more power

i think one crackpot in the parliament spouted something about surrendering your rights to the EU

i think his name was guyver

guy verhofstadt

people don't seem to think centralization has an end to its benefits

its practically for a one world government

a one world government sounds nice but at the cost of nationalist identity and the benefit of the working class it just does more harm than good at this point

it would probably harm the working class in the longrun due to most of the world economy being very eurocentric

im not really a fan of conspiracy theories unless they make sense

it seems the wealthy ultimately benefit from this the most

they would certainly benefit from cheaper labor

the wealthy would benefit like crazy since outsourcing would be inside the country and unless economies were completely standardized they could outsource and use the third world to their hearts content

they have the ultimate weapon

which is media bias

any form of criticism against unregulated immigration would lead to you being labelled a racist

its a pretty solid plan tbh

the media has always been biased

i suppose

but in this case its especially harmful

we need criticism to lead to better governments

its never been an arbiter of truth and has always been a weapon of propaganda, the issue i suppose would be how radical you're willing to let them be

either way the political correctness policing needs to stop

i have some MAGA friends that are afraid of being doxxed for expressing their opinions online

normal conservatives aren't being censored heavily nearly as much as anything to the right of ben shapiro or george w bush.

moderates dont have to worry much i suppose

If you have one controversial opinion, you have to

i don't really think you're political at all if you aren't radical on one point or more, there's never been a single issue in history solved by the guy saying slow down and be careful

Because that's going directly to your boss

With many complaints

i know some people that are critical of islam

they would defo lose their jobs

the west has this misconception that islam is inherently tied to race for some reason

the ideal would be the free exchange of ideas rather than the censorship of ideas

despite plenty of north africans being about as white as italians or spaniards

Some ideas i think should definitely be censored

Islam is tied to race, it just expands a lot

most of the people that practice islam are refugees here in the US i believe

cant recall any area that openly practices islamic belief prior to the refugee crisis

I think that from the old religions, only Catholicism is not tied to race anymore, and that's because they went out of their way to teach non-Europeans how to praise the lord

as long as there is a 2.0 version of every religion then i don't have a problem with people practicing it

What is your religion? <:mthink:520000393837674497>

concepts from islam like polygamy and those whole black dresses that women wear are outdated in the western sphere

tbh idk

i grew up in catholic household

but i dont practice it

>veils are outdated in the western sphere

Have you read the epistles? they pretty clearly instruct women to wear veils in churches

Normie maybe-catholic-maybe-not-ism, I see

churches have become lenient now

more churches are becoming more tolerant of gays and atheism

basically infidelism

christianity as a whole continues to be expanded upon to fit western values

as for my religion i guess im an openminded person so i might be an agnostic theist

not necessarily constrained to a particular religion

Christianity has been bastardized and butchered to fit any agenda

the teaching of jesus have some merit in a western world

mainly by papist ideas of putting tradition and a human over scripture itself

Oh well, I was that when I was a teenager. <:30yoboomer:521380551316209668>

and everything done by the anglican church really lmao

churches have improved since back then when they were scamming people

Do people really have that many proofs of scams happening?

the concept of indulgences was prominent a few hundred years ago

indulgences are overrated and weren't a massive issue

people paid indulgences to lessen their punishment in purgatory

in countries that are like 90% catholic like the philippines they were definitely an issue

infact had they just listened to luther the reforms would've been done and the church would've merely grown stronger

one of filipino national heroes like Jose Rizal even wrote a book that criticized this particular issue

the issue comes up when the church became increasingly stubborn to change

indulgences themselves aren't necessarily monetary

they are essentially something you do to forgive your sins

like a sign of repentance essentially

that was the idea

but because that can mean just about anything

but some churches abused that

things like donating to the church was an indulgence

the issue was the monetary use of them not the concept itself

infact confessions still have a form of it but they don't always call it the same thing

Anywho if the west was more orthodox/fundamental with the scripture otherwise known as a literal interpretation, christian women would wear veils in churches

*Anyhow?

Anywho is also correct

yes

Anywho is classified as slang

Pretty much a misspelling

is there a grammar police somewhere here <:thonk:520003926381166597>

Grammatik Macht Frei

dont report me to grammar gulag for grammar dissent pls

Too late, /Ourwell/ is coming to get you

<:ohno:520006095125872641>

Do you have a political test result? It's common for me to ask for those as a form to get insight on people

Hello and welcome, Zoe

political test result?

im all over the place

So you're new to politics, don't worry, soon you'll start to develop a better idea of where you are.

well idk about that

Well I did

"I FOUND MYSELF AND WANT TO SETTLE DOWN NOW"

What is this, bullwhip?

youre pretty balanced

Why

I'm here now

how does that work

But any modification in my view is just an addition, and not a change, to my overall idea

idk

i feel like being constrained to a specific ideology prevents you from being able to understand the ideas coming from other ideologies of the political spectrum

@Bearer Of The Curse if you're third position what would you call yourself?

strasserist? stalinist?

No, being constrained to a specific ideology *is* being able to understand the ideas

Not doing so is being stuck because you can't

And that's the room for growth

You don't have to follow the word for word of the idea, but you will ultimately have an idea closer to your own philosophy

i suppose

maybe i just dont have as much real life experience yet

how can i understand economics without paying my taxes

im just a college student after all

Paying your taxes is not really a good way to understand economics, but it's surely a start lol

I would just call me an ecofascist, @CrowGoCaw

its a good indicator of how policies in economics truly affect you

something some radicalized sjws might not understand

Somewhat, but then every salary is just as affected by economics