i suppose not

its gone back as far as 1917

if they are advocating for globalism then theyre going about it the wrong way

or maybe the right way

depending on their interests

their internationalism is quite the opposite of something proposed by Juche, they seem to think europe should be at the giving end constantly in exchange for essentially nothing

theyve certainly succeeded in giving themselves more power

i think one crackpot in the parliament spouted something about surrendering your rights to the EU

i think his name was guyver

guy verhofstadt

people don't seem to think centralization has an end to its benefits

its practically for a one world government

a one world government sounds nice but at the cost of nationalist identity and the benefit of the working class it just does more harm than good at this point

it would probably harm the working class in the longrun due to most of the world economy being very eurocentric

im not really a fan of conspiracy theories unless they make sense

it seems the wealthy ultimately benefit from this the most

they would certainly benefit from cheaper labor

the wealthy would benefit like crazy since outsourcing would be inside the country and unless economies were completely standardized they could outsource and use the third world to their hearts content

they have the ultimate weapon

which is media bias

any form of criticism against unregulated immigration would lead to you being labelled a racist

its a pretty solid plan tbh

the media has always been biased

i suppose

but in this case its especially harmful

we need criticism to lead to better governments

its never been an arbiter of truth and has always been a weapon of propaganda, the issue i suppose would be how radical you're willing to let them be

either way the political correctness policing needs to stop

i have some MAGA friends that are afraid of being doxxed for expressing their opinions online

normal conservatives aren't being censored heavily nearly as much as anything to the right of ben shapiro or george w bush.

moderates dont have to worry much i suppose

If you have one controversial opinion, you have to

i don't really think you're political at all if you aren't radical on one point or more, there's never been a single issue in history solved by the guy saying slow down and be careful

Because that's going directly to your boss

With many complaints

i know some people that are critical of islam

they would defo lose their jobs

the west has this misconception that islam is inherently tied to race for some reason

the ideal would be the free exchange of ideas rather than the censorship of ideas

despite plenty of north africans being about as white as italians or spaniards

Some ideas i think should definitely be censored