Message from @Orwell
Discord ID: 523299057872011265
things like donating to the church was an indulgence
the issue was the monetary use of them not the concept itself
infact confessions still have a form of it but they don't always call it the same thing
Anywho if the west was more orthodox/fundamental with the scripture otherwise known as a literal interpretation, christian women would wear veils in churches
*Anyhow?
Anywho is also correct
yes
Anywho is classified as slang
Pretty much a misspelling
is there a grammar police somewhere here <:thonk:520003926381166597>
Grammatik Macht Frei
dont report me to grammar gulag for grammar dissent pls
Too late, /Ourwell/ is coming to get you
<:ohno:520006095125872641>
Do you have a political test result? It's common for me to ask for those as a form to get insight on people
Hello and welcome, Zoe
political test result?
im all over the place
So you're new to politics, don't worry, soon you'll start to develop a better idea of where you are.
Well I did
"I FOUND MYSELF AND WANT TO SETTLE DOWN NOW"
What is this, bullwhip?
youre pretty balanced
Why
I'm here now
how does that work
But any modification in my view is just an addition, and not a change, to my overall idea
idk
i feel like being constrained to a specific ideology prevents you from being able to understand the ideas coming from other ideologies of the political spectrum
@Bearer Of The Curse if you're third position what would you call yourself?
strasserist? stalinist?
No, being constrained to a specific ideology *is* being able to understand the ideas
Not doing so is being stuck because you can't
And that's the room for growth
You don't have to follow the word for word of the idea, but you will ultimately have an idea closer to your own philosophy
i suppose
maybe i just dont have as much real life experience yet
how can i understand economics without paying my taxes
im just a college student after all