pictures
Discord ID: 266396659062145025
111,066 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 85/1111
| Next
she already has my wallet
Your wallet is a social construct, you don't need it.
AOC has my social construct, too
What nonsense is this!?
Preheat the oven please
it's a confirmed troll account being a poe
Seemed too crazy to be real
it's structured like a proper post-modernist
Sounds like feminist Michael Eric Dyson
It's a top tier troll account
My statement still stands
@Agent Smith Was Titania mcGrath the satire account that was banned?
are you thinking Godfrey Elfwick? they used the same face-generator app
That was a facegen app that made that face? Oh, I thought it was a real person that they made a parody account of.
I think it's an app - it looks like those computer generated photofit faces that police use to put out a description where no photo exists
it is certainly computer generated/composite though
both of them
Itโs a fake account it isnโt blue checked.
@Atomicglue who knows. I think itโs a fake account. No blue check. Question for you, does your profile picture say โatomic apologistโ?
"Atomic Apologetics" but, yeah. I don't think so. Not everyone with clout gets a checkmark.
I can confirm what @Atomicglue says. No matter how many followers you guys get me, I'll never have a blue check
@Atomicglue ok. It could be real.
Does that mean you support nuclear energy or is it just a cool name?
@Salacious Swanky Cat has a boner for Nuclear power
Mostly a cool name. Nuclear energy is the way to go but it's just a name I came up with. Apologetics is the craft of defending the Faith.
Lol
Apparently I leveled up.
@Atomicglue yeah. Levels have no meaning. Like @J Edgar says, I do support nuclear energy and Iโd like to learn more about it/defend it better in a debate.
and you'd stick your wiener in the silo if it wouldn't kill you instantly
@J Edgar lol. Not quite. I just want to prevent authoritarian environmentalists from effectively banning it all together.
Apologetics comes from the Greek word "Apologia" meaning to make a Defense. It corresponds with defending the Christian Faith.
@Atomicglue yes. I know that. The word can be used in different contexts too. (Iโd also like to learn how to be a better Christian apologist too. Lol)
I'm in several groups that do just that. Also I host occasionally a podcast/YouTube show called "The Council"
is it a group chat or solo videos like I do?
Group chat. But I've done some solo ones too.
does one have to be religious to be on the council?
Reformed Christian is necessary
Don't know if the YouTube link went to my channel...
I'm not religious. I'm at best religious adjacent. I study religion as a hobby, and I believe in the word, but I associate myself with no church
It's called Atomic Apologetics
Hmmm. I see.
There you go
Bingo
It's the corruption of man in Christianity that I don't agree with. That's why I've dissociated myself with the Churches of Man
But the Word instructs us to be a part of a Body of Believers. (Church)
The word also says that wherever two or three come together in His name, there He is with them.
barring the need for a corrupted community
The corruption of Man only affirms that the Bible is true that were all wretched sinners.
That particular verse is referring to church discipline. Read it in full context.
Here's a great response on this. https://youtu.be/gs3yi9wA4jQ
@Atomicglue Reformed applies to Presbyterian PCA right? Thatโs the denomination Iโm going to now.
@Atomicglue Westminster confession of faith?
Reformed can be that. But I like to think it's for anyone who holds to the 5 Solas. WCF is solid
@Atomicglue ok. Iโm joining the server. Thanks for the invite. ๐
Awesome
@Atomicglue I don't disagree with most of what you said but.
"The corruption of Man only affirms that the Bible is true that were all wretched sinners"
This is circular reasoning, not a very good argument. Its like when feminist say anyone disagreeing must be because they are a misogynist, making it the reason we need more feminism.
@Shadows it may be circular but it's not viciously circular. It ends with the Objective Truth of God.
We don't need to debate this here, i'm heading to sleep anyway, but that statement didn't help with what i said :)
@Shadows ok cool. Get some sleep and we'll tackle more another time
@Shadows not exactly. The Bible is claiming that man is corrupted. Questioning the validity of the Bible because of the corruption of man is a confirmation of the Bibleโs claim that man is corrupted. The claim that men are corrupt and that there are corrupt men in the church doesnโt automatically invalidate the truthfulness of the Bible itself. Therefore, it really isnโt circular reasoning. I just saw that you are going to bed, but I typed this out before then. Sorry. Good night
Its cool, i saw you typing so i waited
Will just say, i always like helping people make better arguments (as most already know), so would just like you guys to think about what do you and @Atomicglue say to people who don't believe in god.
@Shadows gotcha, I appreciate that.
I know Shadows went to bed already, but I want to clarify. I didn't say I didn't believe in God or the Resurrection. Quite the opposite is true actually, nor did I question the validity of the bible.
@J Edgar I know. ๐
noose?
@J Edgar Ya, that wasn't about you :)
But just the general point of that is very bad reasoning.
Has John Stossel not been paying attention? Google crosses all kinds of creepy lines all the time.
@wolfman1911 Ya, he has known that for a while, but still brings it up because not everyone else does.
@Agent Smith Good catch!
Well then.
Next level meming?
Apparently
Translate tweet: *women and blacks are inferior*
There should be a translate tweet option for HER tweet. Not only his
Same person
Pissing hell. Who knew Avril would be so edgy?
@lettsface That's hate speech.
111,066 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 85/1111
| Next