Message from @Atomicglue
Discord ID: 524119442830000142
It's called Atomic Apologetics
Hmmm. I see.
There you go
Bingo
It's the corruption of man in Christianity that I don't agree with. That's why I've dissociated myself with the Churches of Man
But the Word instructs us to be a part of a Body of Believers. (Church)
The word also says that wherever two or three come together in His name, there He is with them.
barring the need for a corrupted community
The corruption of Man only affirms that the Bible is true that were all wretched sinners.
That particular verse is referring to church discipline. Read it in full context.
Here's a great response on this. https://youtu.be/gs3yi9wA4jQ
@Atomicglue Reformed applies to Presbyterian PCA right? That’s the denomination I’m going to now.
@Atomicglue Westminster confession of faith?
Reformed can be that. But I like to think it's for anyone who holds to the 5 Solas. WCF is solid
@Atomicglue ok. I’m joining the server. Thanks for the invite. 😃
Awesome
@Atomicglue I don't disagree with most of what you said but.
"The corruption of Man only affirms that the Bible is true that were all wretched sinners"
This is circular reasoning, not a very good argument. Its like when feminist say anyone disagreeing must be because they are a misogynist, making it the reason we need more feminism.
@Shadows it may be circular but it's not viciously circular. It ends with the Objective Truth of God.
We don't need to debate this here, i'm heading to sleep anyway, but that statement didn't help with what i said :)
@Shadows not exactly. The Bible is claiming that man is corrupted. Questioning the validity of the Bible because of the corruption of man is a confirmation of the Bible’s claim that man is corrupted. The claim that men are corrupt and that there are corrupt men in the church doesn’t automatically invalidate the truthfulness of the Bible itself. Therefore, it really isn’t circular reasoning. I just saw that you are going to bed, but I typed this out before then. Sorry. Good night
Its cool, i saw you typing so i waited
Will just say, i always like helping people make better arguments (as most already know), so would just like you guys to think about what do you and @Atomicglue say to people who don't believe in god.
@Shadows gotcha, I appreciate that.
I know Shadows went to bed already, but I want to clarify. I didn't say I didn't believe in God or the Resurrection. Quite the opposite is true actually, nor did I question the validity of the bible.
@J Edgar I know. 😃
noose?
@J Edgar Ya, that wasn't about you :)
But just the general point of that is very bad reasoning.
Has John Stossel not been paying attention? Google crosses all kinds of creepy lines all the time.
@wolfman1911 Ya, he has known that for a while, but still brings it up because not everyone else does.
@Agent Smith Good catch!
Well then.
Next level meming?
Apparently