Hey

@battlegoth5 <#587115763106840576>

Now that's just disrespectful

I think Communism is a horrible system that's only aim is to mix together all the people under it's control, and to destroy the enemy of the Jews. If I were Lenin, Stalin or any other (likely Jewish) Communist leader, I would dismantle it all. I also think it is obvious that Communism is on the rise again, even tho it's the most shittiest kind of Communism, but I remain calm in the fact that when Communism rises, so does Fascism and National Socialism.

That made me hard.

lol

The problem with communism is materialist conception of history as class struggle, it’s reduction of man to just an economic status and the fact that throughout history all it has done is destroy cultures in the same way capitalism does. Communism is not the correct alternative to communism because it does not correct the primary disfunction of capitalism, it’s materialism.

@WΣIRD NΣTWØRK ϟϟ communism is not “on the rise” that’s ridiculous. China is the furthest thing from communism, and most of the “communists” today especially in the US are just liberals dressing up in red. The few that actually are communist are more worried about not misgendering each other than actually starting a working class revolution and aren’t taken seriously by the majority of the working class. The threat is global capitalism and neo-liberalism. Stop buying into old Cold War propaganda

Yes, but you're not seeing the threats on rise. US Liberals are the new Communists, as well as Antifa and all the other Ancoms. The threat isn't their ability to actually organize anything serious, it's the fact of their rampant violence against any who even slightly disagree with them. I agree the global capitalism and neo-liberalism are both threats, but I believe that they are possibly even threats to modern Communism.

US liberals are not "the new communists." America as a country is literally built of liberalism and the values it espouses. Either you misunderstand what communism is or you misunderstand what liberalism is. "Antifa and all other Ancoms" are again, not taken seriously by the majority of the working class, literally the people they are trying to appeal to. As well as this all they end up doing in reality is re-enforcing the status quo. They are incapable of brining real fundamental change

We are no longer in the cold war. You need to understand this if you want to evoke actual change and rid the world of materialist disease and the systems that stem from it

Reminder that the American Antifa branch occupied the New York subway yesterday to make public transport free and to suspend cops from the subways

antifa is racist

Anybody who calls himself a socialist in the United States is most likely what Sorel called parliamentary socialist

Ie a libtard soc dem or anarchist sperg

I have more respect for state socialist however their ideology is a complete paradox. They take the position of Marx which is based on individualistic ontology like liberalism because it argues the individual is pre-existing state and the point of the theory is to destroy the state internationally because it holds “capitalist relations”. Obviously putting communes or worker councils with state oversight means the state bureaucrats are going to eventually run the economic sector and then you end up with something like modern China a corporate technocratic system, which is insanely superior to liberal free markets.

The fundamental problem with socialism in its current form is liberal ontology. If you get rid of liberal ontology and materialism you will end up with something more analogous to mercantilism or Guilds.

Possession is the act of possessing. Property is the act of ownership as recognized by law.

Law is administered and is a function of a judiciary and legal system maintained by a political organisation. Custom is collectively acknowledged conduct in accordance with authority (implicitly or explicitly.)

But why would these concepts be conflated so much by all modern political theory from the 1600s to the present? Again, Hodgson notes the connection between such opposites as Marx and Mises on page 105 and page 106:

“Consider the Austrian school economist Ludwig Von Mises. He argued that legal concepts could be largely relegated from economics and sociology…

Hence for Von Mises, ownership was natural and ahistorical rather than legal or institutional. A physical rather than a social relationship, it was deemed independent of law or any other social institution. Von Mises downgraded the institutions required for the protection and enforcement of the capacity to have and neglected the social aspects of ownership and consumption, which may signal identity, power, or status. Contrary to Mises, the law does not simply add a normative justification for having something: it also reinforces the de facto ability to use and hold onto the asset.

The resemblance to Marx’s dismissal of law is uncanny: both Marx and Von Mises concentrated on raw physical power over objects rather than legal rights. Marx’s numerous discussions of “property” had little to say about legal rights, and he conflated property with possession. Hence Marx (1975,351) in 1844 addressed ” private property” and argued that “an object is only ours when we have it-…when we directly possess, eat, drink, wear, inhabit it, etc.,-in short, when we use it.” With both Marx and Von Mises, effective power over something is conflated with a de facto right. Legal and moral aspects of property are overshadowed.”

Of course they both would. They are both trying to define away the state in the issue of property. This is the key issue. All modern theory is fundamentally anarchist, it just varies in how delusional it is on this point.If all property is really possession, then we have to try to explain how and why people stay together – Hobbes. At which point the state is really a kind of alien entity which is called in as an umpire, or a stationary bandit that enforces these peer to peer agreements between property holders/ possession holders. When the likes of Adam Smith then talk about governance and sovereignty whilst holding the labor theory of value, he makes no sense. No one does.

Just one of the small things I’m willing to explain that shows that Marxism is literally just another formation of liberal autism

@Eno @WΣIRD NΣTWØRK ϟϟ @Small Man @Jamin @Koninos

Lennon and McCartney are better for the world than Lenin & Stalin. There was another prominent member of the red October. He fled to Mexico, was gunned down there... Anyone remember his name?

Trotsky

@Zoltanous State Socialism ❤️

**QOTD 🔖 **
*Has the neoliberal revolution in the 70s and 80s helped or hurt us?*

@everyone

Both

Kinda fucked us on a few big things

Hurt

No debate

I think it was kinda like pissing on the corpse at that point.

But at the same time

Hurt

It did lead to a situation where nationalism is on the rise

Eh

The only reason nationalism is on the rise is because neoliberalism shredded the coherent nation-state

More like

kys

Ronald Reagan deserved to be shot

So do you

/\ this

Fuck

Well that works

I guess we have ourselves a happy little accident

Communist cunt

Shut the fuck up

Only if you shove the fuck in me

)))Communism(((_

daddy

@battlegoth5 bootlicker

(((l*bertarianism)))

Boot licker lol lol

Loner

<:smug:591181720565579807>

This is you

This is you

Wait how

How tf did you know

OMG

you stoker

I am calling the police

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/416790126174273558/670387056052273182/real-life-mario-characters_221280.gif

Your honor

I rest my case

Ok commie

Have fun being a minority

STOP CIRCUMCISION ASAP

I think it hurt us because Liberals are pussys

That is true

Mmmmm communists importing mestizos to manufacture a communist revolution thinking only white republicans will lose their money is top KEK

neoliberalism hurt us very much

<:sniff:591452013682753536>

<:lmao:588490785029226548>

The only thing the Neo liberal revolution did was help economic growth other than that it’s been fundamentally a disaster humanity

Zapatistas were based

That sounds like some alien shit right there

Neo-Liberalism is a cancer, all it does is grow for its own benefit

Destroying the people and the planet

We need men

We need people from the 40s who weren’t pussys

For money, for control

You mean boomers?

They did not mind running into MG fire or grenades so yea

And Jewish

@Son of Liberty most were executed

no

I mean veterans

Vietnam veterans are the same

It's just soldiers, they don't give a shit

Hitler was a faggot and a really cringe one at that

@☭ SovietsDidNothingWrong Ⓐ he is??? w0w Jokar thunks hitler is a feegwut!!!!!!

Vrvh

Just a Moralistic Cuck

He really loved to suck the cocks of those Corporations

DM me for free tarot readings

<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***battlegoth5#6976 was muted*** | L

<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***Asdrubal#6951 has been warned., <#588205956039442452> is a serious channel***

<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***George Mason#0528 has been warned., <#588205956039442452> is a serious channel, no adhom or insults***

<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***AnarchoJoker#4368 has been warned., <#588205956039442452> is a serious channel***

<:dynoSuccess:314691591484866560> ***Nozem#2310 has been warned., <#588205956039442452> is a serious channel***

I was being genuine in my views.
The decline was already in full swing by the time the 1970's rolled around.
the 1960's were the start with the start of the hippy and free love movement.
the 1970's just continued that with the 1980's moving towards consumerism due to cheap tech and a booming economy.

How was i joking around?

How on God's green earth was i joking around for talking about Reinhard Hydrich?

there's probably some kind of word filter that got tripped

Some people are @☭ SovietsDidNothingWrong Ⓐ

The vast majority, no

@Deleted User Ok f*moid reactionary

(((F*scist)))

Lmao

A retard

@☭ SovietsDidNothingWrong Ⓐ if you let the old flag fall you get a bullet dog

Which flag are you waving goyim

Gentile

Kuffar

@Deleted User

The British flag bro

@☭ SovietsDidNothingWrong Ⓐ

@☭ SovietsDidNothingWrong Ⓐ ur cool 🤗

Question of the Day. 🔖
-What do you think are going to be the results of the Iowa Caucus?
@everyone

bernie

Bernie

Bernie is going to win most of the delegates

what is the iowa caucus

bernie my man

is this about who the dems pick?
I can see them picking HRC again.

i hope bernie sanders

I don't know, we're reaching a tipping point soon. Maybe it'll be Bleeding Kansas all over again.

BERNIE2020

DELANEY2020

who tf is delaney

he probably dropped out lmao

iowa caucus is a general meeting amongst both parties where they move around and vote for who they want. if their candidate doesn't meet the 15% threshold of supporters, they have to pick another candidate. rinse and repeat and you get somebody

Bernie or Yang

BERNIE SANDERS

bernie sanders is like

YANGGANG2020

love that man

bernie2020

no doubt

20YANG20

I can see the dems being stubborn enough to choose Hillary again.
Bernie is popular but he isn't establishment.
Yang is a popular choice too but I think he'll raise the taxes on the guys that actually pull the strings in the dem party.

wait

hillary is running?????

I dunno

wut

she seems like the person to be stupid enough to not quit

nah she's not running ion think

thank god

i hate hillary

like compared to trump she's a bit more tolerable

but i still don't like her

maybe her daughter

**just my opinion**

can Obama run again?

nah he can't do a 3rd term

there is a 2 term limit

plus obama wasn't that good of a president

just better than trump

I know he's bad but the left loves him

I think the KC chiefs are gonna win.
Oh, wait. That's football, and yesterday.

Shows how much I care. <:wtf:591182282648190986>

Trump is going to win again anyway because the dems are unlikable.

Bernie Sanders is very likable

never heard of her

Boomers and anyone outside of college dont like him

Imagine people unironically voting for a kike

kek! kek! based!

your choice is between Chairman Yang, the NY kike, and the orange goyim.
regardless of the outcome you guys are going to get some kosher boning.

Question of the Day. 🔖
-Should the State of the Union have partisan motivations? Should it be on controversial ideas and issues?
@everyone

They already do quite frankly

I don't follow this shit

me neither

bruh

me neither

partisanship in the government is bad

smh

Me neither

Theoretically, the State of the Union is establishment containment

In practice, it’s vaguely partisan

@Joe The Communist yes, no.

imagine caring

@OrthoGoat#5017 do I have to?

This question is way Washington didn't want us to have parties. So we wouldn't have to chose between partisanship or actually adressing issues we face.

Instead of clucking like squabbling cocks for the hen

I am not completely against political parties but the extent of partisan bullshit is out of control

Political parties can only truly exist in a system that's run against the benefit of the People who created the System, if the System is being run for the benefit of the People it will automatically become an authoritarian dictatorship because that is the only way one can be truly ideological

QOTD 🔖

Was the idea of "Manifest Destiny" in America justified? Could it be considered an imperialist idea?
@everyone

no

it is super imperialist

how tf can it be justufied its literally some pseudo religious bullshit lmao

It was Based Imperialism

@Phalanx Нащо ти всіх пінгнув

Manifest Destiny was a noble cause, but it was not good

Too imperialist

Manifest Destiny was an evil and imperialist cause and very bad

@GlobalDelete How was it very bad

Because it was imperialist

Manifest Destiny was based

The chad white man was destine to move westward

And bring civilization to savages

Manifest Destiny is cool if it doesn't interfere with other European groups

Its obviously justified

Yes

I mean

Imperialism is cool

bruh

And america is the best nation in the world

BRUH

LOOK AT THIS DUDE

@Deleted User Wrong

Therefore american imperialism

Mutt

Is the best type of imperialism

America isn't a legitimate nation

Show me your 23andme

America is more legitimate than wherever you are from

Yes goyim give your DNA to a company partnered with the NSA

Ok so youre 50% jewish

No

Prove it

My nose isn't hooked

So

Prove it

Prove it

Yeah

You made the claim I'm a Jew

Yep

Burden of Proof is in you

No

Yes

Yuropoor

Post face

Post 23andme

*yes goyim post ur face so I can know who you are and give ur dna to a federal accomplice*

GTFO fed

Youre not even in america

I am

So youre a yuropoor in america

Thats gay

You wouldn't exist without Europe

Outta my country immigrant

OUT

What country?