You’re all not pagans

Irish Gaelic is dying out

Doesn’t mean they have assimilated

Now the mainly just speak english

The ira begs to differ

the *ira* hahaha

The IRA is basically nonexistant

Doesn’t mean their sentiment is dead

Many Irish wanna gtfo of Britain

Sure, there's people who larp, but most people in Ireland don't want violence

Scots and welsh almost exclusively speak english

@Gromp

So do the Jews

Plus there are cultural similarities.

Bruh

Whatever, think for a second: if the jews have assimilated then why do they differentiate them selves from just britons?

The Old Testament is literally a rip off of the Tora

It's the same book dufus

But it's the "old" testament. As in no longer viable.

The Catholic Church begs to differ

No they don't

All christianity has rejected the kingdom laws in the old testament

That's the point of the New testament

So the 10 commandments can be discarded?

Also why do the welsh and Scottish get the cultural similarity card but not the Jews?

Mean regardless of wether people still live by it it had a huge impact on western culture

The 10 commandements aren't kingdom laws

They're moral laws

Because the jews aren't nearly as culturally similiar

Again, if they had assimilated then why would they distinguish themselves from just British? A scot isn't scottish-british.

Because being Scottish is being British.

Monotheistic faiths are inherently too divisive anyways

This wouldn't be an issue if we just embraced state and/or national pantheism

Paganism and christianity are the only acceptable religions

Plus atheism

"Acceptable"

*Paganism*

Bro just sacrifice this guy here lol yeet

heck yeah, pagans

@Shalopy what's bad about it?

From a secular perspective

I'm not looking at it from a secular perspective

from any perspective?

Faiths should be pantheistic or syncretic to enable maximum efficiency

No

If you mix stuff together you get nothing

Like mixing beer with wine

Fucking shit

Really only islam and christianity are some what compatible

To extent Hinduism and Buddhism aswell

It just enables a greater amount of people to feel connected in the same spiritual community

Sounds like tolerance for tolerance's sake.

Which is gay

Foreign religions should be banned

Tolerance for the sake of ensuring a larger base of individuals within a community

thus enhancing its capabilities

The main thing is ensuring said faiths are kept under the same umbrella tbh

said faith should be a tool of the state to efficiently rule

By tolerating say islam who are expanding the citizenry to? Foreigners! And it allows our own folk to be corrupted by foreign ideas. Now why would I want thay?

state mandated Islam doesn't sound that bad when you think about it

I mean

I'm not really for monotheistic faiths unless they can be syncretic, so

And yes, that includes Christianity

@Deli.v2 it sounds gay af

is your argument literally "homosex lol"

That wasn't an argument

Monotheism inherently weakens a state/culture tbh

How?

it reduces the power of any sovereign by placing a figure "above" them

that's only if you make the religion part of the government

or state

It doesn't reduce their power whatsoever as they could still have ultimate temporal power. In addition if the religion is state mandated usually the executive is viewed as god's servant or something

if the religion is its own entity then the sovereign remains the de facto ruler

Or operating "under the grace of" said de facto ruler

Ideally the sovereign should be the head of a cult within said pantheistic faith

and beyond that, a myriad of other gods/goddesses should exist to ensure continuity from one ruler to the next

Serving as a unifying force

Further, a pantheistic faith enables other pantheists to more effectively integrate if they desire to

I reckon there's other ways to promote national unity than forcing people into a cult but go off

Well sure, but it's another strengthening factor

and I don't mean cult in terms of the modern sense

but rather, a traditional sense

Think pharaohs, or the imperial cult of rome

The church in government will result in conflict between the secularist and church

Secularism can't quite be unifying or used as a tool of a state

It's a restricting, and imposes limits

Likewise, it'll result in conflict between the religious and the state in many cases

Do keep in mind I'm not advocating for civil liberties to be taken away on religious grounds

Agnosticism, atheism, and any religion should be allowed

But a greater emphasis upon the state's pantheon

Likewise, this pantheon shouldn't be discriminatory, but generally unifying

The state can't be used as a symbol or tool for unification if the church exists in the totalitarian dystopias everyone in this server wants

Bible literally says you cant worship money and god

This indirectly implies that you cant worship the state and god

Right, but I don't really care about the bible?

Also, I'd want the state and church to be linked

I don't want a totalist dystopia, in fact, the religion should be lenient

I'm not referring to you specifically

We havent talked much

I'm talking about the broader spectrum of authoritarian fags

Fair

I'm sure I disagree with them on plenty of fronts

To be fair though

You kind of sound like one of those kids @Light

Howso?

@Asdrubal

Edgy 14 year olds

Atheist / has a butterfly knife / "Hitler was a socialist" / Lolbertarian / Monster snapback / #darkhumorandmemes #filthyfrank #911 #schoolshooter #cancer

Lolbertarianism is the same as anarchism

The rich will rule everyone and crime will be everywhere

@Gromp jews are the rich dufus

A significant proportion

Capitalism cant exist without the state

@CHEF BФYARDEE

Still doesn’t change the fact that it’s porky at the end of the day pulling the strings lmao

Porky doesnt exist without the state

Of course

Ain’t denying that

It's his greatest defense

Remove it and hes gone

Well yea but for doing that you need the right material conditions

Imagine being entirely anti-capitalism

Imagine thinking socialism and marxism have never truly existed

Imagine

Well damn my bad. I thought Marxism was described in all those books I’ve read but turns out it was just a dream I had last night

Curious indeed

Only some rich people are actively causing modern problems. A lot of them are just sitting on their money doing nothing for society.

The entirety of rich people are a problem

^^^^

@𝔸𝕍𝔼 imagine having capitalist sympathies

Jews are the capitalists

Jews are the rich

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/635621963351588876/649517764263804928/unknown.png

GUYS

GUYS

SHOULD I CLCIK THIS ??? 😳 😳 😳 😳

What in the flying fuck

Well click it because I want to know how you fucking fit that entire title into a video

@CHEF BФYARDEE

Chad

https://youtu.be/Fjy8ryejxJU

I bought a copy of the Phenomenology of Spirit for black Friday

Didn't get a discount though

Dude at the cash register was like "I'm a philosophy buff too, haha material dialectics"

Bruh stfu Hegel is an idealist

Financial apocalypse is gonna happen. $1.8 quadrillion of fiat (all the worlds banknotes, coins, savings accounts, chequings accounts, additional accounts, all debt, all value in stock markets, all funds invested in real estate, all money invested in derivatives and other financial instruments) is going to collapse within 12 months from today. Only 6.6 billion troy ounces (31.1grams = 1 Troy ounce) of gold has ever been mined throughout history, so an ounce of gold accounts for $273,000 of this fiat but in reality it is more since roughly 15% of all the gold that’s ever been mined is lost. Silver too is good, roughly 66 billion ounces of silver has ever been mined so an ounce can account for $27,300 of this unbacked fiat but in reality it’s more since roughly 40% of all the silver that’s ever been mined is lost. Invest in the insurance of god before it’s too late. A literal ounce can save you.

What makes gold worthwhile?

How is "gold" going to be worth anything if modern agriculture collapses?

If modern infrastructure collapses

Shiny

Gold and silver are good for a post-war scenario

Useless for post-nuclear-war scenario

@Light scarcity

And history

To the poll, ideally I don't think we should be teaching jobs in school because we should all just have family farms :). But in reality right now it should be trades or stem.

Rare =/= useful

trades are the foundation of any civilised society

So is art tho

art is kinda the foundation of any society

@Light it doesnt need to be useful

there is an overlap ig
a carpenter can also be an artist
plumbing is one of the most important things to society

(Even though silver is used alot in manufacturing)

gold is pretty useful tbh

very ductile

How?

for electronics

lots of electronics use gold

But in light's scenario

Electronics are also rare

can gold be used for disinfectant?
silver and copper used to be used for these things

Anyway

The main driving force for their value will be scarcity

If your scenario where modern agriculture or modern infrastructure collapses

Its scarcity and our lack of ability to mine more on an industrial scale such as before will drive up its value

Making it prime for new financial systems to use gold or silver backed currency as a medium of exchange

Rare =/= valuable, worthwhile

You know whst would be more worthwhile?

More valuable metals, food (preserved, perhaps)

Anything really

I'd argue thst by being so scarce, it'd be worth less than some more common things

As not enough currency would exist for everyone

this nigga out here advocating for a barter economy

We'd resort to bartering until a new state arises

At which point they'd likely issue their own currency

I dont think people struggling for survival will be in thr gold market tbh

we would trade with bottlecaps

That's unironically a better system

Caps are at least relatively plentiful, meaning they coule be somewhat widespread

Enabling enough currency for a population

They're also small easily defined units, compared to gold

Which just comes in weight (so unless you havr a scale, it's useless)

And doesn't have a standard "unit"

could be locally based as well, ie people that live near the ruins of coke factory use coke caps and people near beer ruins use beer caps

tfw beverages determing the new national boundaries

Drinks are more widespread

But caps are way easier thsn gold to use as currency

I mean, consider purity too

koolaid nation vs coke republic

Gold is only worthwhile as a short term investment in regards to gold prices

The same as stocks, really

@Light modern society can't adjust to the barter system

We're talking about a post-collapse society, @Asdrubal

Ofc presently actual money is ideal

<:kys:591182416262070282>

Please raid this video of a state-sponsored french rapper promoting great replacement :

https://youtu.be/ddsm5m9D4EY
(Search : "Grand Remplacement Younès )
Massive dislikes needed.

And tell the man on twitter what you think about his song :
https://twitter.com/YoonOnTheMoon?s=09

For the complete lyrics and explanation see this post : https://t.me/GalliaDaily/145?single

You do realize this satire lmao?

He’s making fun of people like you

Maybe

Still gay

Satire or not it's still opposed to my interests

@Gromp

The description says how "nothing is being replaced just transformed" clearly a prog

An enemy

You do realize by brainlessly brigading him you’re proving him right lul ? @The Desert Fox V

@Gromp how are we proving him right by disliking his shitty song?

You’re showing him that enough buffoons like you exist who actually buy into that conspiracy shit and that he was completely right in making it

Btw interacting with a video in any way whatsoever on yt will push that video in the algorithm so if anything you’d prolly end up promoting him

>conspiracy

Are you denying the fact whites will be a minority in the west?

@Gromp

I sure hope so, dont think there’s any chance of it happening anytime soon tho @The Desert Fox V

@Gromp

Oh no whites are gonna be a minority by 4%

That is a bad thing

Whites should not be below 80% in a country that is theirs

You mean when they came in and slaughtered the natives lmao

>lmao

Read channel name

It was conquest and war, something every civilization has done

Including the natives

The natives lacked the technology and organization to defend themselves, and therefore lost. That is the way history works.

So following that logic the others have every right to take over my dude

Ain’t a one way street

I know.

Then why is it a bad thing?

But anyone also has a right to defend themselves against it

From what?

Invasion

What invasion lol?

It’s not the others faults whites refuse to ante

Mass Immigration

Mate

Legal and illegal

Yea because they want to make money

Not to fuck over white people

And we have a right to kill them if they come here without our permission

Lmao