Again, if they had assimilated then why would they distinguish themselves from just British? A scot isn't scottish-british.

Because being Scottish is being British.

Monotheistic faiths are inherently too divisive anyways

This wouldn't be an issue if we just embraced state and/or national pantheism

Paganism and christianity are the only acceptable religions

Plus atheism

"Acceptable"

*Paganism*

Bro just sacrifice this guy here lol yeet

heck yeah, pagans

@Shalopy what's bad about it?

From a secular perspective

I'm not looking at it from a secular perspective

from any perspective?

Faiths should be pantheistic or syncretic to enable maximum efficiency

No

If you mix stuff together you get nothing

Like mixing beer with wine

Fucking shit

Really only islam and christianity are some what compatible

To extent Hinduism and Buddhism aswell

It just enables a greater amount of people to feel connected in the same spiritual community

Sounds like tolerance for tolerance's sake.

Which is gay

Foreign religions should be banned

Tolerance for the sake of ensuring a larger base of individuals within a community

thus enhancing its capabilities

The main thing is ensuring said faiths are kept under the same umbrella tbh

said faith should be a tool of the state to efficiently rule

By tolerating say islam who are expanding the citizenry to? Foreigners! And it allows our own folk to be corrupted by foreign ideas. Now why would I want thay?

state mandated Islam doesn't sound that bad when you think about it

I mean

I'm not really for monotheistic faiths unless they can be syncretic, so

And yes, that includes Christianity

@Deli.v2 it sounds gay af

is your argument literally "homosex lol"

That wasn't an argument

Monotheism inherently weakens a state/culture tbh

How?

it reduces the power of any sovereign by placing a figure "above" them

that's only if you make the religion part of the government