@sunman - Market socialism is socialism (workers controlling factories) in a market economy (decisions made by individual firms, which are in turn controlled in a democratic fashion by workers), contrasting state socialism which is centrally planned socialism (decisions made by central government, which is supposed to represent "the people")

We must cultivate our own garden

I'm not in favor of a traditional theocracy tbh

The governing system depends on your type of election

individual executive + appointed/inherited = monarchy

Since we judge them subjectively, no

There's no objective answer, though, as different traits may be desired/helpful in different circumstances

In a situation where humanity has exceeded carrying capacity, though

Whether due to drought, famine, or some other disaster

Isn't sacrifice and cannibalism more beneficial?

It's all about the situation

I presume you'd agree that mandatory abortions for pregnancies planned to be carried to full term and infanticide are...

well, not terribly different

Appointed can mean an elective monarchy

I mean, the point is the same, you're investing relatively absolute power into an individual who achieves their position outside of democratic means

Nice

Spoiler: He believes in some conspiracy

yes you are

I mean, presuming you're not completely celtic/anglo-saxon/norman, you're kinda a foreigner then

Also, it's a tad ironic to accuse a religion of being supremacist, using that as a criticism, while I presume seeking to eradicate it to preserver the interests of your faith/lack thereof

Also nice, the culture is gay

Pretty much

'cept ethnicity doesn't matter

Ideology, and the factors which contribute to it, are more important

"They're bad for doing exactly what I'm doing"

(even though they're not doing it)

Criticize Jewish supremacy groups, that's fair

Just maybe not random jewish people who have lived in Britain for centuries?

Right, but 90% of people don't take religion to a logical conclusion

and people who have been in a nation for centuries aren't really foreigners

but whatever

Once you get past 1st gen, people aren't really "foreigners"

Also, prove that a majority of people do

That's the positive claim

It's made of culture

"Britain"/"The United Kingdom" =/= a nation

It's a state filled with multiple cultures

Genetics be damned ngl

Also, I'm pretty sure most Jewish brits speak English

Even then there's divisions

Urban/rural

socioeconomic...

Self-determination should just be on the smallest scale possible

That's why you've gotta have a general confederation

A sort of neo-feudal political structure in order to enable local freedom of unique cultures, but ensure unity among larger groups

Monotheistic faiths are inherently too divisive anyways

This wouldn't be an issue if we just embraced state and/or national pantheism

No age limits?

but why?

you're letting kids do drugs

Values are subjective, so I mean, unless two things are identical, they can't be equal

heck yeah, pagans

from any perspective?

Faiths should be pantheistic or syncretic to enable maximum efficiency

It just enables a greater amount of people to feel connected in the same spiritual community

Tolerance for the sake of ensuring a larger base of individuals within a community

thus enhancing its capabilities

The main thing is ensuring said faiths are kept under the same umbrella tbh

said faith should be a tool of the state to efficiently rule

I mean

I'm not really for monotheistic faiths unless they can be syncretic, so

And yes, that includes Christianity

Monotheism inherently weakens a state/culture tbh

it reduces the power of any sovereign by placing a figure "above" them

Or operating "under the grace of" said de facto ruler

Ideally the sovereign should be the head of a cult within said pantheistic faith

and beyond that, a myriad of other gods/goddesses should exist to ensure continuity from one ruler to the next

Serving as a unifying force

Further, a pantheistic faith enables other pantheists to more effectively integrate if they desire to

Well sure, but it's another strengthening factor

and I don't mean cult in terms of the modern sense

but rather, a traditional sense

Think pharaohs, or the imperial cult of rome

Secularism can't quite be unifying or used as a tool of a state

It's a restricting, and imposes limits

Likewise, it'll result in conflict between the religious and the state in many cases

Do keep in mind I'm not advocating for civil liberties to be taken away on religious grounds

Agnosticism, atheism, and any religion should be allowed

But a greater emphasis upon the state's pantheon

Likewise, this pantheon shouldn't be discriminatory, but generally unifying

Right, but I don't really care about the bible?

Also, I'd want the state and church to be linked

I don't want a totalist dystopia, in fact, the religion should be lenient

Fair

I'm sure I disagree with them on plenty of fronts

that and also the emphasis on homogenous populations tbh

Nazis are garbage too

as are auth-coms

I mean

I'm fine with some auth ideologies

and I'm more in the center regardless

but whatever

Howso?

@Asdrubal

I really should get around to playing a night in the woods

Stop denying the holodomor genocide

It was russifications

Why bother with the bible?