chat
Discord ID: 587015719141507102
85,659 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 295/857
| Next
Yep
600 billion isnโt funneled into NATO you absolute mong. Literally read the chart you just posted it says only 30 billion is directly spent on europe with the rest of the spending going towards our own military which has assets across the globe. Most european defense in operated by europeans. More or less we provide manpower and weapons systems for europeans to purchase.
And to pick on Norway as an example of spending when they have a population less than Indiana isnโt saying much
Maybe look at Germany or Britain. Germany specifically put funding into recruiting some 20,000 men over the last two years in response to Russia.
germany also trains tank maneuvers with broomsticks and is notoriously underfunded
and does not want to change
Page 4 graph 5
NATO guidelines require at least 2% funding of GDP into defence
USA is 5.28 %
Which is completely arbitrary
europe and canada 1.48
Germany has begun to change as has Europe in the face of russia
out of 919 billion dollars in 2018
605 was USA dollars
313 was europe and canada combined
You can see in the link you just posted that non-american spending has been rising
Because now they have something to spend it for, Russia.
There hasnโt been a need for most european nations to spend so much for the past three decades, unlike the US has as the world peace keeper.
2011 percentage of GDP spent on defense
1.52 in 2011 1.48 in 2018
Germany (Euros) 34,630 36,168 34,593 34,749 35,898 37,598 40,447 41,913
from 2011 to 2018
the monetary value has slightly increased
that is true
Albania (Leks) 19,877 19,820 19,022 18,788 16,671 16,250 17,199 19,492
Hungary (Forint) 295,967 297,650 286,341 281,402 316,338 362,798 402,793 484,031
Hungary has really increased theirs though
Comparing 2011 to 2018 overlooks that spending was still declining until Russia annexed crimea in 2014.
but over all the values have stayed the same
Since 2014 itโs gone up
adding 3-6 billion to the budget
does nothing
thats very little
Because itโs only been four years and the politics take time to change
a billion dollars to a nation is not very much
Depends on which country
Again itโs not that they cannot do it itโs because many in Europe still donโt see a need to spend so much
Also short scale numbers LUL
Europe is perfectly capable of militarization as seen in the cold war
Give it a decade of spending increases with russia acting as a threat and they can rival us spending
We are *capable* of
We arenโt barbarians though
there will be another british empire
I wish
Fuck the British
The Brits are one of the biggest forces responsible for the world being such a shithole today
lmao
wrong
@Deleted User brits made the industrial revolution
nuff said
IR was very cringe and bluepilled
yes it raised qol around the world and is the sole reason for most fuckers existence
stop larping anprim nigga
ok muh empire fag
empire will return
ireland will be first
it already has
under israel
lmao
your country is ruled by jews and pakis
where are you from exactly?
usa
lmao
fuckoff youre troll nigga
lmao ok sport
your country is derailing far quicker then mine
a small island vs a large landmass
population is more easily replaced
wtf are you talking about?
Britain made the refugee crisis
oh no no no no
By drawing up shitty borders in the middle east and supporting the Sauds during ww1
thats just factually incorrect
refugee crisis was caused by cia/ mossad intervention in teh middle east
weve remained mostly unaffected by refugees anyway
most of the brunt is on eastern euro
Yeah but who created Israel
the artifical countrys made by the british caused the ethnic tension to allow for Wahhabism to take hold better
are you serious
its not just one factor
are you denying your countrys role
this is advanced gymnastics
israelis constantly interfered with our process
which is why we let them go
"His Majesty's government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."
ok?
i dont see how any of that has any relevance to the current refugee crisis
If you claim that mossad is responsible for it
Than so would the British lmao
it didnt spring from thin air
They literally allowed Israel to come into existence
youre seriously an idiot
it was a progressive line of factors that came into play
cause and effect
ect.
your just being blatantly disingenuous
Dont deny the fact that the british empire is why Israel exists rn
^
the british literally caused the conflicts in the Middle east by making countrys based on oil and money rather then ethnic groups and religion
except...
you havent established any causal relationship between british policy and the refugee crisis @Veraien
all you have said is that britain had a role in the existence of israel
85,659 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 295/857
| Next