palaestra_debates
Discord ID: 613769462633463808
5,349 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 3/22
| Next
Judicial power is vested in the various judiciaries of the United Kingdom, who by constitution and statute[7] have judicial independence of the Government.
The Church of England, of which the monarch is the head, has its own legislative, judicial and executive structures.
Powers independent of government are legally granted to other public bodies by statute or Statutory Instrument such as an Order in Council, Royal Commission or otherwise.
The sovereign's role as a constitutional monarch is largely limited to non-partisan functions, such as granting honours. This role has been recognised since the 19th century.
The Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 removed the monarch's authority to dissolve Parliament; however the Act specifically retained the monarch's power of prorogation.
Some of the government's executive authority is theoretically and nominally vested in the sovereign and is known as the royal prerogative. The monarch acts within the constraints of convention and precedent, exercising prerogative only on the advice of ministers responsible to Parliament, often through the prime minister or Privy Council.
The royal prerogative includes the powers to appoint and dismiss ministers, regulate the civil service, issue passports, declare war, make peace, direct the actions of the military, and negotiate and ratify treaties, alliances, and international agreements. However, a treaty cannot alter the domestic laws of the United Kingdom; an Act of Parliament is necessary in such cases.
The Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, commonly known internationally as the UK Parliament, British Parliament, or Westminster Parliament, and domestically simply as Parliament or Westminster, is the supreme legislative body of the United Kingdom.
The Parliament of the United Kingdom is bicameral, with an upper house, the House of Lords, and a lower house, the House of Commons.
In modern times, real power is vested in the House of Commons; the Sovereign acts only as a figurehead and the powers of the House of Lords are greatly limited.
@Broken Cocaine Bars ^^^^ there is your answer... so who is wrong?
"Some of the government's executive authority is theoretically and nominally vested in the sovereign and is known as the royal prerogative. The monarch acts within the constraints of convention and precedent, exercising prerogative only on the advice of ministers responsible to Parliament, often through the prime minister or Privy Council."
yes... that still means she has to follow rules... isnt above the law totally
"the government's executive authority is theoretically and nominally vested in the sovereign and is known as the royal prerogative"
continue reading after that tho
Nuclear power.
Has carbon capture ever presented any proof of concept?
Not that I'm aware of, tbh.
Trees seem to be the best for it, and young trees at that.
Cut them down when they stop growing.
Bury the tree trunk and grow new tree
Rinse and repeat
Nah, you use the tree for wood products.
Other than that, yeah.
Money well spend even if it does not work, it creates competent people in this area.
Sadly most people just want the move the pollution overseas via outsourcing
the way global warming was explained to me was with a feedback loop
so I somehow imagine it won't actually be bad
what will happen is we'll find that there's a counter-mechanism that prevents the globe from warming exponentially
That and more of canada becoming arable and not frozen over
not to mention Greenland, which was named, presumably, before the last ice age
And the antarctic is still growing
Intels new GPU (not larabeeeeeeeee REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE)
Look at these fags trying to starve the trees
Release co2 to save the forests
there is a counter-mechanism
its called volcanic winter
Letโs do it
Unlimited snow days
my fellow negros may not like it
they might decide to mutate
My comfort zone for temperature is in the teens on both C and F. So I welcome our inevitable eternal winter
What? Is it negative C?
My comfort zone is Cยฐ is about 11-20ish
20's being on the "a little too warm" side
Great set of books
> Spengler introduces his book as a "Copernican overturning" involving the rejection of the Eurocentric view of history, especially the division of history into the linear "ancient-medieval-modern" rubric. According to Spengler, the meaningful units for history are not epochs but whole cultures which evolve as organisms. He recognizes at least eight high cultures: Babylonian, Egyptian, Chinese, Indian, Mesoamerican (Mayan/Aztec), Classical (Greek/Roman), Arabian, and Western or European. Cultures have a lifespan of about a thousand years of flourishing, and a thousand years of decline. The final stage of each culture is, in his word use, a "civilization".
ok guys
Dr Pepper is the best soda, and Coca Cola is trash
anyone disagree?
Yeah
So it looks like the bloodbath of diversity is finally hitting the ux industry, this will be fun, since they are the ones that design most products in big tech
@nim.bm I know I am 50 messages behind. But no, you haven't had a revolution therefore your still in an archaic system.
Coca Cola is good with rum
Or for some reason as icecubes, even though the syrup separates weirdly
Anyway, the point of a revolution of the people is, to accept the people's voices through a vote. None of which has been adjusted for the rights of the people. There is still a what could you call it; surfdom, peasant system - politeriate Vs bourgeois system in the UK. People, love that system. Now, they have to change it. Those whom don't want to, are voting remain. Those whom want devolution of certain powers, want to leave. This isn't just about Europe anymore. This is about constitution and fairness
At the moment, I do feel sorry for those whom travelled to the UK illegally. Because now, they really have to consider leaving because this is going to become a revolt. There is just the Queen in power.
@TEABAG!!! donโt @ me, people were talking about coke and doctor pepper before your boring uninteresting opinions
Youโre allowed to @ me because youโre not teabag though
I was aware that this was Palestra debates. I did not want to debate over soft drinks.
Coke adds life
||red dwarf reference||
A paper arguing that Boasian Anthropology, Freudian Psychology, Multiculturalism, Marxism and Left-Wing political movements in general are best understood in terms of Jewish group evolutionary strategy.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-018-0158-4
Wrongthink squad has already got this on their radar
They'll probably get the paper removed, force the editors to apologize and shut down the researchers PayPal, Credit Card, Patreon etc., apart from getting his degrees revoked, in a matter of months
meh, subjective crackpot racist pseudo science, if he gets cast out thats his problem, not ours<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
"Meh, Darwin is peddling heretic crackpot theories, if he gets cast out that's his problem, not ours <:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>" - Pastor Thundercock, 1860
Darwin is relativly correct in his assesment of evolution, MacDonald is not correct in his subjective assertations of 'group evolution' and 'Jewish Genes'
I dont really give a crap what Yishai Fleisher thinks about jews and how they should behave
especially since this piece is just a vehicle for slinging mud against his political opponents
Remember guys: race is more important then actual familiar relations. If your brother fucks an Asian and has kids with her, you should feel more related to some random white kids from across the street then to your nieces and nephews. Isn't modern ethno-nationalism smart?!
.
I sometimes unironically think that this whole ethno-nat soft revival is low key endorsed by the fookin illuminati or some shit: "How do we atomize a multi-ethnic society to make it ezer to control, Phil? I know John! Let's convince them they should break their familiar bonds and identify along semi-arbitrary criteria that will allow us to market politics to them on a group-by-group basis and play them against one another". That or at least by cosmetics companies that want to create ez to track consumer groups, or some shit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KOddPQc7hk Bolsonaro should have played this after his speech, when he got elected
RED NEGRO'S RUNNIED RHODESIA
althoguh thankfully mugabe is dead
Hiya, I haven't been very active here, so not sure which channel this topic would be most appropriate in, but since this says "debates", I'll try my luck.
When did it cease to be sufficient for a family to be sustainable on a single income? Why ? Or was that never the case and the whole "man works" think is a myth?
Seems to me to be a fundamental flaw of our time that both parents in an average family are forced by circumstance to work. Maybe I am wrong, but in any case, sources and stats would be welcome.
Unsung hero who tried to stahp the fall of S Africa:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janusz_Waluล
getting rid of apartied in South Africa was a mistake
@Okojamos It never really worked except in a very specific historic and geographic frame, and only for some. It;s basically an American myth.
since now the whites are getting fucked over
we should have supported Rhodesia in bombing the Reds into oblivan
@Tonight at 11 - DOOM Sources?
Mayo, ketchup and salad cream
everyone is getting fucked over
not just the whites
lol
@Okojamos Idfk, reading about History
Women DID work
always
they just did different things
and tended to work in the house to also be around the kids as they worked
the revolution of the modern era is taking them out of the home, not making them work
and even that is only true to some degree
women did work outside of the home before
it just wasn't as common as it is today
So far the only thing that makes sense to me is that feminism is to blame. As usual.
There was a whole international movement in the 19th century saying that a worker should be able to feed his family for his wage. Implying that he *couldn't*
Waifu had to work too
and the kids, in the case of the poorer ones
which was also entirely common thru history
The only time when a common man could feed his family for his wage was the post WWII era in the West
At least that I know of
If you look at tribes that live today
it's not: 'fembots no work'
it's: 'there is works that men do and there is different work that fembots do'
specialization
Dude goes out to hunt, gall goes fetch water and pick berries
and at the end of the day they have a deer they can cook in the water and some berries for seasoning
or something like that
The idea that women don't work is just... Weird and outlandish...
There are different types of work. There's taking care of your family at home, and there is slaving away for a faceless corporation for 60 hours a week.
pretty much
the think is technology made housework ez
and/or superfluous
no need to fix pants if pants are cheep af
lol plus labour has continually been devalued
So fembots felt pressured to go do more 'masculine' Jebs
part by reality
part by idiotic ideology
but the reality came 1st
most fookin 19th century female factory workers didn't think they were #Oppressed by their husbands...
that's upper middle class, bored idiots
who came up with that
a tad later
Trust me, the 45 year old female cashier at TESCO's doesn;t think the patriarchy is her main problem
she is way too poor to be that detached from reality
I wish we stopped relying on the state to teach and bring up the children and the average family had the option for one parent to work and one to home teach and care about the kids and the household.
I wish we had unicorn candy
I bet it'd taste like the rainbow
Good for you.
Great answer.
<:tiptip:462282246695419934>
The industrial revolutions really were a deal with the devil.
Singl parents' cash is good to run the engine of the family unit! That's... That'd be awesome
Seems to me that if that is not our goal as a society, what's the point?
Itโs why the state wants to break the family up into smaller individual units
That is easier to control
Same with breaking up communities with diversity, you can look at studies on how social cohesion and civic trust goes down
People hunker down into their house and donโt go outside with the community causing isolation
And then drugs... I honestly donโt know why drugs are so big
I hate them, I want them done with but idk what causes it
I could guess it has to do with the death of god, as mustache man once said
The loss of meaning and responsibility
Maybe itโs too much freedom without enough duty
Weโre so free we donโt know what to do with ourselves
In some sense
Diversity is no issue as long as the people have the same beliefs as us #CivicNationalism. @Snake
So what we see is that political views are heritable, and that races self segregate
And when they mix it causes lower trust
Trust me NO ONE wanted these kind of things to be true
Same thing with the study that Jordan Peterson mentioned. (How men and women in more equalitarian societyโs become MORE likely to fill in traditional gender roles)
And here we can see who voted for trump
Sorry bud
Civic nationalism works.
I mean you can say that if you want to
But I donโt see it working for us, or Yugoslavia
It *is* working in America. It *is* working in Yugoslavia.
Civic nationalism allows anyone of any race or ethnicity to become a part of the state as long as they have the same values
It's working in Serbai
Yugoslavia doesnโt exist
Oh
Yeah no Serbia is majority Serb
America I wouldnโt say itโs working rn
Most people agree
We just disagree on why itโs falling apart
I mean shit, look at California
It has minorities in there.
And it works.
Iโm not against having minorities lol
I donโt actually know someone that wants a 100% **huewhite** ethnostate
Then you're a civic nationalist.
No our underlying premises are different
There is still a difference
Like I want a majority white country
what about a 100% futanari ethnostate
I want whites to maintain majority
galaxy brain
Remember guys: race is more important then actual familiar relations. If your brother fucks an Asian and has kids with her, you should feel more related to some random white kids from across the street then to your nieces and nephews. Isn't modern ethno-nationalism smart?!
DIE DEGENERATE
<:hypersmugon:544638648721604608>
Nigga listen, obviously you should care about those close to you more
But having a preference towards your own race isnโt evil
But what if they're not my race?
Well thatโs tricky isnโt it, but I donโt pretend to know everything
I would say you care about them more
It's not tricky
Than a random person
your ideology is just retarded
Ethno-nationalism is stupid
Civic-nationalism is good.
SHIT DUDE YOU GOT ME WITH ONE VERY SPECIFIC SITUATION AND CALLED ME DUMB
I mean yeah
Alright man
it's an every day situation
that your model cannot really handle
I wouldnโt say itโs as every day as you believe
lol
Considering people self segregate into their own communities
People self segregating is bad.
Lmao
Freedom of association bad
Another reason for civic-nationalism.
People won't segregate as much.
People will follow the same values and will coexist
America is civic nationalist
People still self segregate
It's not.
America is ethno nationalist
It's not.
What is America?
Not nationalist.
True but itโs falling apart because of that
Nor is it civic.
You already said that
All the issues would go away if it were civic-nationalist
I mean yes, I agree, two different groups of people wanting to have the country being very different than what it is right now. That will just go away
Yeah I see that
Everyone will be unified
And will follow the same values
Ok so you think America or a country is based on values, right?
It can be
Yes but thatโs what you want right
Or a common culture
Language
All
Common culture, language etc
And values
I mean, Britain could be Canada or even... America then right? They are using the same Language and culture
Hell theyโre all democratic
And have the same enlightenment values
But what happens when we learn values are heritable
Or what happens when values change so radically but the peopleโs own will
Can you say antifa and conservatives are the same nation?
If based on values
They donโt agree on history
Values, Iโd say the culture is different
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
Sorry I was in the other channel
You can all have the same people in the same nation as long as they have the same values
Values need people to hold them
True, values we will instil in people at school.
5,349 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 3/22
| Next