uk_politics
Discord ID: 622430298746912768
177,160 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 301/1772
| Next
in terms of kwh per dollar its nuclear fission (uranium), hydro electric ng, oil, coal, wind, nuclear fission (thorium, for now), and finally right at the bottom solar
maintaining them is a bitch and expensive... and also requires fossil fuels
they are noisy and just generally pretty lame yo
Significantly less than say, a coal plant
> The UK has 15 operational nuclear reactors at seven plants
Meaning we're less dependant on imports
Which from a strategic POV is very good
@Crafty are they power plants or breeder reactors though?
Foriegn companies and countries will have less influence / control over us
By holding their coal / oil / gas exports hostage
Or, ramping up the price
Coastal wind turbines are not an unreasonable idea in the UK, especially now their unsubsidised cost is now competitive
in terms of polutants wind is pretty good, solar is shit on both fronts, with just co2 emissions a full cycle solar pannel causes more than any fossil fuel except coal, and including non greenhouse gas polutants solar is just the worst
climate change is bullshit really
Don't care @UnScottable
National security.
admittedly don't know @killerqwerty, but it seems UK's nuclear energy supply peaked in the '90s
i think nuclear would be a much danker option
most uranium is mined in canada
Except the French own most if not all of our reactors
British nuclear is cucked out to foreigners
ewww Frogs
whyd you give em to the french. wtf
Exactly @Dubdogelmo
just go take em back
*Hon hon hon*
be like hey you
give me my reactor back biiiitch
so for the us nuclear is 100% safe nationaly since canada is basicaly a part of the usa
@ShardS there are also massive uranium deposits in Australia
well the big energy producer for the US is natural gas now
Interesting how all of the Uranium is in former British dominions
yeah, nuclear gets gutted every time a dem/labour government is in place
the real reason us/uk nuclear is about 20 years behind france and japan.
i dnt understand why that is... is it they are just afraid of a malfunction?
Pretty much yeah
No one wants that
Nuclear in Japan is dead @ShardS
its not really that hard to shut them down
All the reactors have been shutdown
even though its less likely, and less dangerous than most other types of malfunction
ALL.
well, japan shot itself in the foot then
Japan has regressed to fossil fuels
too much public pressure?
the two times they have malfunctioned it was on much older reactors
Yep @Crafty
basicaly people are stupid
@UnScottable this does a good job of going over the reasons for nuclear fear: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mI6IzPCmIW8
these days they are actually pretty reliable
some japs are outright superstitious about nuclear
well tbf Fukushima was a bit of a mess
A reason why they shouldn't vote ๐ @ShardS
fukushima was old
and on a coastline
Well the problem with Japan is, they're always going to have issues like that due to their geography
Yeah i know by i cant blame them for being nervous about it
chernobel was old, and managed by soviet russia
They're on the boundry of 4 tectonic plates
They will always have massive earthquakes, storms, etc.
So nuclear isn't really a good idea for them
From a safety POV
it actualy is
oi you got a loicense to be worried?
TL:DR rich Californians didn't want poor people ruining the local area so they project feared them.
Also, every bit of lost land is crippling to the Japs
Since they don't have much usable land to start with
Chernobyl was a management fuckup coupled with reactor design.
incidentally something i watched recently
https://youtu.be/YDvKkG1FTbU
recommend
I love ghost towns like that tbh
Reminds me of Fallout
Points frozen in time
South africa sholud return to aphartied and given nuclear weapons, i don't see how this could go wrong
@tea_in_space who's giving south africa nukes?
well why don't we give South africa nukes i mean during the 80s they tried to create a secret nuclear program between them and israel
so why don't the US just give them some i mean what could possibly go wrong
whitie's gotta pay.
and the payment is nukes
well if it returned culturally to the 80s or 60s i see no problem in giving them nukes
Yeah, there's a reason why you were blocked
Let me do that again tbh
i mean what go wrong in giving them nukes
i see no holes in this plan what so ever
as long as you don't also give them missiles it should be fine
wait but then how else are they gonna transport the nukes
by truck
a missile truck
plus why don't we just give them missiles that have the ability to transport a 50 megaton nuke
i see nothing wrong with this what so ever
pfftt kids having porn?
whats wrong with that
<:smugon:512048583806025739>
@tea_in_space the only 50 MT weapon ever built was the tsar bomba, and it was too large to transport and had to be constructed on site, the largest warheads capable of being fitted to an ICBM are around 9 MT
never mind, it was air droped, my bad
but still
Do y'think we're ever gonna see Extinction Rebellion just...commit mass-suicide or something crazy like that?
I want them to keep disrupting London
It would fit the namesake, and given that they've been kicked out of London I imagine that their next protest will be one big action before they're disbanded
177,160 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 301/1772
| Next