Governors:
Dem Tossup: 1 (CT)
Independent Tossup: 1 (AK)
GOP Loss: 3 (IL, ME, NM)
GOP Tossup: 3 (FL, MI, NV)
House:
Dem Loss: 1 (PA-14)
Dem Tossup: 2 (MN-01, MN-08)
GOP Loss: 7 (AZ-02, CA-49, FL-27, NJ-02, PA-05, PA-06, PA-07)
GOP Tossup: 18 (CA-10, CA-25, CA-39, CA-48, CO-06, FL-26, IA-01, MN-03, MI-11, MN-02, NE-02, NJ-11, NY-19, NY-22, NJ-11, PA-01, PA-17, WA-08)
Senate:
Dem Tossup: 5 (FL, IN, MO, ND, WV)
GOP Tossup: 2 (AZ, NV)

I would also say MT

for senate

and maybe TN

TN, yikes. Marsha Blackburn is a horrible person. But she will still probably win

yeah

I think all nationalists are horrible

Good to know

And why would you say that?

They dont see that governments are to protect you, not to create a national identity

I've helped write several posts on House/Senate elections and recommendations in our Reddit sub - I did Tennessee - boy, that state was depressing AF

Huh? I'm confused Jeff

Nationalists believe in their own country before others

my rifle is the one that protects me

and with manifest destiny, we were made under the social contract theory, the idea that government rules a land and not a people is messed up

your rifle is the model that people use to kill

so im suppossed to let the other guy kill me or steal my property?

no

Any rifle is such model

your supposed to take his gun and burn it

Since when does metal burn?

News to me

he will shoot me. how will i take it

?

use something

we have knives

bows

jesus, liberals are mental

And precisely, he's 100 feet away, you say put down your rifle so I can take it

arrows

You honestly think he'd surrender???

a gun is a weapon of war

destroy them all

Ok arrows, that's dumb, by the time I ready an arrow he's shot me

By the time I grab a knife he's shot me

i bet jeffs the type of guy that says "why did that cop shoot that murderer that was shooting at him? why didnt he just taze the gun out of his hands?"

By the time I call the police, he's shot me and robbed my house

If guns are outlawed, only the GOVERNMENT will have guns. And that's no bueno.

Why was the gun produced outside the military in the first place

thats what he wants

Also, there are MILLIONS of unregistered guns

So arrest the dealer

They're illegal in the first place, do you honestly think people would surrender them?

democrats dream is to disarm everyone,get themselves in charge and then oppress everyone.

not all Dems

So that just means people who legally own guns would submit them

I think they will surrender, to a military squad

nah, not alll. just 90 percent of them. the other 10 are just braindead

heyyyyyy now

Buddy

You can't track an unregistered gun

Republicans called parkland fake

I'm a republican

15, in the public school system

You're 15??

In Florida

I mean hardcore freedom caucus republicans

And I know Parkland was darn real

exactly

And I darn well support the 2nd amendment

but why

As do I - although I vote Dem in local elections - mostly

you saw what happened at parkland and columbine

The 19 year old dude at Parkland had the gun illegally

no

He should not have been on campus

he bought the gun legally

from a local gun shop

The police officer freaking cowered outside while letting students get murdered

No he was not legally allowed to own it

even though the FBI went to him 37 times he got through the background check

There were multiple calls to police of his mental instability

Right? Cops are good at stomping blacks outside of the Waffle House, but not so good at helping in actual dangerous situations

multiple

There were hundreds of things that went wrong

I can understand guns and a gun range or handguns

And you idiots blame the gun

bun rifles and assault rifles?

Do you think AR means assault rifle? Are you one of those idiots?

yeah

Assault rifles are banned

AR = ARmaLite

AR stands for the company that makes them

ArmaLite

lol

They also make shotguns and snipers

A sniper is a freaking assault rifle? Really?

I am a lefty that is very pro 2A

There are no guns in Britain, and now the government jails hundreds of thousands for posting offensive content on social media

theres been a bunch of shooting in the UK recently

But-but-but the gun buyback worked in Australia right?!?! There was just a shooting killing 7 people in AU.

By no guns I meant a ban

Let the government take your second and they take your first

in sweden the liberal eutopia they have grenade attacks by the "peaceful" refugees.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_grenade_attacks_in_Sweden

They're now banning knives in Britain due to a recent amount of knife attacks

trying to*

What's next banning sticks?

thats what liberals want here in the US

@A guy named Jeff Do you have a counterargument or no?

sorry what?

I was uploading my senate map

I was making the map

one moment let me read

We've been here completely trashing your point and you aren't defending it

oh

So during the assault weapons ban in the US everyone was good

the shootings decreased

read time magazine

it said so

they are from your conservative media

Time magazine is conservative?

even trump in 2000 agreed

yeah

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

they come from merideth co

@A guy named Jeff what state are you from btw

NJ

haha

gotta diss you now

=p

Merideth co comes from Koch

Time magazine conservative is the actual funniest thing I have heard in the past week

Next to someone saying "Wait, they got the sun in Spain?"

it's parent company is parented by the Koch brothers

But that's not the argument

https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/765/1*nq5oCL32cZdki3PGi-Wf2w.jpeg

Is the argument

Regardless of who wins or loses,

where is that from?

there will be a 1 to 3 seat majority for whichever party controls Congress in 2019

it'll be a close race

Can't find my source ignore that

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-34996604

https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/data_stats/abortion.htm

Do you agree with these sites as reputable?

sorry to break it but the first site, no

this dude has to be larping as a liberal and trolling us

The first site is the BBC

The second is a government site

Are you ok?

You used a graph

BBC in my head was second

No I said "Can't find my source ignore that"

ok

But BBC and CDC are credible

So you agree with the BBC statistic of how many gun deaths there are in 2015?

Ok good

@A guy named Jeff Are you an opens border person?

yeah

What's your motive

both my parents are imigrants

Ah

You want more of your own people in the country?

So @A guy named Jeff There is a 0.004079214% chance you will die by gun in the USA

According to the BBC

@Deleted User yes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_35a7sn6ds

I despise this "we get the job done" shtick

Americans can get the job done too

same

it just hamilton

The argument suggests that Americans are too stupid to do the work

According to the CDC, there is a 0.186% chance that you will not even be born in the USA

What is the bigger issue?

0.004079214% or 0.186%

ok look, guns are an issue

I am ok with ranges and handguns

But not hunting?

but military grade weapons belong in the military, not on civilian hands

What wins an AR-15 or a glock

hunting is ok

well

and and AR-15 belongs in the military

it's hard to define military grade

http://i.4cdn.org/pol/1526074648111.png

this kid needs to learn how to spell

well, you said ranges and handguns, and hunting requires a shotgun or a rifle

"assault weapons" and "military-grade" are kind of vague

expand on that a bit

AR-15 is military grade? If you go into combat with an AR-15 you are an absolute idiot

If it is for hunting, I dont like hunting but I can allow it

You will get killed so darn fast

and David Hogg is a parkland survivor

As long as an AR-15 doesn't have a bump stock or a switch that can turn it to full auto, I don't see a problem

So are the conservative survivors that CNN silences

Yeah I agree on the bump stock issue

Actually no

For the original intent of defending against a tyrannical government you'd need a full auto

Any gun you can kill someone on the military in battle with is a military gun

I have a constitutional right to a nuclear weapon if I want one to defend myself from the government

No you dont

Dude

If someone shoots a soldier

And I take a rock and throw it at the soldier who then dies

Is a rock a military weapon?

no

but in battle the soldier should have a gun

Is a rock naturally meant to kill military personnel

If you take a glock and shoot a soldier in the back of the head when he isn't looking is it military grade?

why dont we save the military guy one gun instead of giving it to a psycopath

No

It's not military grade

A musket was once military grade

You take a semi-auto against a full-auto and you die in seconds

You have no chance

Was once is the key word

I know

but what kind of idiot would go around with a musket?

Well that's what you want us to carry

So, you

no

I want you to carry switchblades

I have a switchblade

Hmmmmmmmmmmmm

A handgun of a kinfe

Who wins?

*grabs knife* *gets shot*

That's who

Once, the best the government had was muskets while the best a farmer had was a musket.
Today, a civilian could legaly get semi auto rifles and make them fully automated the government has a predator drone and nuclear warheads

Whoa, whoa

Ok nukes are a no-no

or you can throw the knife an leave the handgun guy with a bigger wound

A wound or a shot to the head killing instantly?

a knife to the head would also kill instantly

Well,

buddy if you can throw a knife that well

I imagine that would be difficult

Also, you can dodge a knife

Not a bullet

you can

you need fast reflexes

Oh please, who are you the flash?

I tried before

Ok now you're just lying

In a LSC simulation

That makes sense

A pice of plywood could block a knife, not a bullet

I was 0.7 second away

If it travels thousands of feet per second

.7 seconds means you're as good as dead

I know

.1 means you're good as dead

@Deleted User can you save me?

He's not a liberal

Just a liberal lover

And a hater of me so he may help

I'm no expert on gun policy

@Deleted User do you even know what liberal means?

Yes it's a political ideology