Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 444619399069040660
What is the bigger issue?
0.004079214% or 0.186%
ok look, guns are an issue
I am ok with ranges and handguns
But not hunting?
but military grade weapons belong in the military, not on civilian hands
What wins an AR-15 or a glock
hunting is ok
well
and and AR-15 belongs in the military
it's hard to define military grade
http://i.4cdn.org/pol/1526074648111.png
this kid needs to learn how to spell
well, you said ranges and handguns, and hunting requires a shotgun or a rifle
"assault weapons" and "military-grade" are kind of vague
expand on that a bit
AR-15 is military grade? If you go into combat with an AR-15 you are an absolute idiot
If it is for hunting, I dont like hunting but I can allow it
You will get killed so darn fast
and David Hogg is a parkland survivor
As long as an AR-15 doesn't have a bump stock or a switch that can turn it to full auto, I don't see a problem
Yeah I agree on the bump stock issue
Actually no
For the original intent of defending against a tyrannical government you'd need a full auto
Any gun you can kill someone on the military in battle with is a military gun
I have a constitutional right to a nuclear weapon if I want one to defend myself from the government
No you dont
Dude
If someone shoots a soldier
And I take a rock and throw it at the soldier who then dies
Is a rock a military weapon?
no
but in battle the soldier should have a gun
Is a rock naturally meant to kill military personnel
If you take a glock and shoot a soldier in the back of the head when he isn't looking is it military grade?
why dont we save the military guy one gun instead of giving it to a psycopath
No
It's not military grade
A musket was once military grade
You take a semi-auto against a full-auto and you die in seconds
You have no chance