But not hunting?

but military grade weapons belong in the military, not on civilian hands

What wins an AR-15 or a glock

hunting is ok

well

and and AR-15 belongs in the military

it's hard to define military grade

http://i.4cdn.org/pol/1526074648111.png

this kid needs to learn how to spell

well, you said ranges and handguns, and hunting requires a shotgun or a rifle

"assault weapons" and "military-grade" are kind of vague

expand on that a bit

AR-15 is military grade? If you go into combat with an AR-15 you are an absolute idiot

If it is for hunting, I dont like hunting but I can allow it

You will get killed so darn fast

and David Hogg is a parkland survivor

As long as an AR-15 doesn't have a bump stock or a switch that can turn it to full auto, I don't see a problem

So are the conservative survivors that CNN silences

Yeah I agree on the bump stock issue

Actually no

For the original intent of defending against a tyrannical government you'd need a full auto

Any gun you can kill someone on the military in battle with is a military gun

I have a constitutional right to a nuclear weapon if I want one to defend myself from the government

No you dont

Dude

If someone shoots a soldier

And I take a rock and throw it at the soldier who then dies

Is a rock a military weapon?

no

but in battle the soldier should have a gun

Is a rock naturally meant to kill military personnel

If you take a glock and shoot a soldier in the back of the head when he isn't looking is it military grade?

why dont we save the military guy one gun instead of giving it to a psycopath

No

It's not military grade

A musket was once military grade

You take a semi-auto against a full-auto and you die in seconds

You have no chance

Was once is the key word

I know

but what kind of idiot would go around with a musket?

Well that's what you want us to carry