#general (Discord ID: 276935978369810432) in Anticom, page 686
Security Advisory: Links in messages may lead to maliciously operated websites that could track your IP address and reveal your identity, or they may contain harmful files. The DiscordLeaks team does not check links and cannot make any statements about the safety of following these links.
Some ways to protect yourself are:
we were pretty much africa un til then
excpet instead of machetes, we used swords
that sounds fun
Anywhere still like that?
well the thing is
Any place I can go to in a redcoat with a musket and be seen as king still?
everyone loves double barrel shot guns
and since gun laws are pretty strict
people settle beef with swords, etc
are you hindu?
how's that outside india? Do you still abstain from beef and stuff or has it become a more casual religious thing?
i abstain from beef
love chicken wings
and we re technically not prohibited form eating buffalo or ox meat
but i dont eat as much meat
Are you meant to not eat chicken?
get my protein form elsewhere
do you get an upgrade if you do well in this lifetime?
thats how it worls
be a good goy
get born into a good fam
if u help nibbas out
u get an upgrade
if u do soemthing hella good
do you upgrade in fam but stay within your kin (race)?
u are freed from the cycle of reincarnation
is that how it works?
do you want to be freed from the cycle?
well we r very against race mixing and cousin marriage, atleast in north india
^ Freed from the cycle
Does hinduism consider all the races to be of different spiritual and souls.
ie an indian will never be reborn as a white dude
my frineds brother for example, got disowned for marrying a gook
G O O K E D
well the vedas technically do have an aryan supremacist ideologu\y, and refer to other races as barbarians
keep in mind
my uncle dates a lot of asian women.
i don't think he has yellow fever tbh, i'm pretty sure he's just a cunt and no one else will put up with him.
this was back when india was actual kangz
and we technically do consder all races equal, religiously
not so much
b4 dem brits came and took it away?
or do you consider the sultanates to be more of a loss of indian kangship?
1000 years of islamic rule in india is a meme
the only successful sultanate was moghul
and they got btfod by the marathas and the sikhs
only laseted a 100 years or so
but they had a lasting impact
first foreigners to bend the caste system to their will
the caste sytsem was pretty fluid b4 the muzzies and bongs came
ofc some sort of race factor was rpesent
Good idea that, fluid classes mean innovation and class mobility
but that was mostly for marriage
thats y high caste people tend to look a lil different
norht indians in genral look different form your avg poo
slender noses, not jewish however
mostly swarthy olive or sometimes lighter skin
and we have balls
yeee, i've met a few whiter looking indians who when i asked being a little autistic kid said something about the castes.
pretty huge oens
south idnians are nice goys
but they have australoid features
and tend to be your stereotypical indian cuck
pretty much all north indians arent cucks
they just stay aloof
but they hate muzzies with a passion
the only reason indians are docile in other coutnres
is cuz theyre scared af of being deported
latinos etc dont have that problem
chinks are like idnians in that way
i've generally found chinks have a rather docile personality though.
look at an indian in india the worng way
they will stare u down, or murder u and put u in a ditch
we re pretty much nigger tier to anyone non-indian
that's pretty rough
cuz evryoen still hates whiteys for starvong 30 million browns for the sake of some railroads
and they hate muzslims as a given
india would be better if they had their own meiji restroation rtaher than actually ebing colonized
the fuck, didn't know it was that much
yea thats the numebr that ive heard
ive also heard 10 millkion
it;s between those two numebrs
was it a good railroad at least?
i dunno, british rule in india and decolonisation especially just seemed really badly planned.
There doesn't seem to have been malice so much as greed and incompetence.
the europena treatment of africa was much better
well heres y it fucked up
they made their own controlled opposition
gandhi and the indian national congress were all british puppets
a face-saving measure
how did they win so much then?
the sepoys were ready to revolt any time
and the brits needed india for the seconf world war
crown of the empire 😉
india was conquered cuz it was essnetially like eirope
a hundred fractured kingdoms
pitted agaisnt each other
yes, the british bought of folk and backed rebellions and made deals till they had control through a series of vassal lords that were already established and company rule.
with 17th century guns
the princely states
cucks all of them
I don't india could have gone through a meiji restoration tbh
well it was ont he path towards it
some of the bigger clans, and the sikh empire in the nrothwest were industrializing and m odernizing their armies
japan was left alone because it was difficult to reach, geographically unimportant and had no major natural resources.
India was easy to reach for europe, geographically essential for asian trade and had a fuck tonne of resources, Europe wasn't gonna let india unify under native rule.
the sikhs couldve beaten the bongs in the first anglo-sikh war had the bongs not bribed their genrals
the british feared that the siksh would invade the part of india thatw as ruled by ol john comapny
and that the sepoys would revolt and join the sikhs
leading to sikh dominion in norht india
and prolly south too
they cut the head off the snake
by bribing the commanders
who were loyal tot he sikh queen
the queen wa sin a power struggle with the khalsa
the queen signed a pact with the bongs in orde rto secure her throne
as for the maratha empire
though if britain was forced out france would have tried to move in.
and if both were forced out you could expect russia and japan to try to gain power.
Even if india managed to gain true independence from britain it was going to spend the 19th century being harried, invaded and undermined.
it had fractured into anhindred lil kingodms
well france did try to conquer
youre right chancellor
russia woudlnt have been able
russia would not have been able
as it was halted by the Emirate fo Afhanistan (19th centue)
shit my typing is crap
>sikhs could have beaten the british
but with britain forced out of the region they likely would have pushed into afghanistan and persia
search up the great game
The only reason Britain stopped killing you was because it cost too much money
AnMaonach read the book "flashman and the mountain of light"
hsitorical documents predicted that siksh would win
Mate that's a novel
historical documents predicted hitler would be a moderate
siksh were the only modernized army in dinai besides the britisha t the tiem
As in not real
the back of the book is entirely footnotes and referneces tot he sources
reach the afterword
It's not real
It's called fiction
the brtish fear of a sepoy revolt and sikhs invading was real
and if u know about that war
u know the sikh genrals had been bribed by the bongs
pay in the sikh army was twice taht of the east idnia company
and the sepoys had more in common with the siksh then the bin gs
Money does not make a superior force
they feared the sepoys going over to the other side
Nigger I'm not reading your stupid fiction novel
the sikh army was the only modernized force in india besides britain
So what if the british would have been slowed down
im getting this shit form jewpedia
They would still have taken your lands
It would just have taken longer
If you honestly think that the sikhs could have withstood the might of the largest empire in human history you're delusional
afghanistan ddid it
in the anglo afghan wars
if some desert inbred s can
im pretty sure the sikhs can to
what are supply lines while being backed by another rival empire
India is not afghanistan
the afghans werent being backed
If it was then it wouldn't have been conqured
If you were able to beat the british you historically would have
and india is fileld with jungle and soem hills, prime guerilla warfare scenario
Still not afghanistan and you know it
we woudl have if we were united n shiet
Ah yes the myth
thus we got raped
If only ism
and yet afghanistan was conquered later still
Implying afghanistan is independent
US puppet state more like
>unironically thinking that some streetshitters being united does anything other than slow the british down
Google the opium wars mate
india probably would have had more autonomy similar to china though
>pushing white guilt
Oh how the mighty have fallen.
>Improving your lot in life is oppressive to sad sacks that don't
>every person's worth is the same just for the sake of existing
What a perfect microcosm of everything that's wrong with leftist thought.
>Working out in order to beat fascism is fascist.
@4Ni3 posted this a few days ago. It can't be posted enough.
>everything costs more than $600
seems pretty typical for the faggots in antifa
**DAILY REMINDER TO GIT FIT**
question: are any of you here fascist/natsoc?
what is your opinion on property rights? also this poll: http://www.strawpoll.me/13418256
I'm trying to find out what is actually a common belief on the alt right. One is gun rights
We're third way
Property rights are okay with me
well, the """skeptic""" community assumes the entire alt right supports ethnonationalism
I do believe in ethnonationalism... You can also believe in property rights lmao.
That's not far from true, most civic nationalists are filed as alt-lite or something else
Richard fuckhead doesn't support it
Private property rights are an integral part of fascism
He's a fan of balkanization though
property rights means private ownership of many things and a free economy
Individuals can own all kinds of capital
I am a centrist on the economy.
You get an economy free of jews
okay, and would you say there is a relative split in the alt right community between rightwing, more extreme libertarians (such as hoppe) and natsocs?
would ancaps be included in the alt right?