2. Nothing wrong with this paper more of a user error though

They come to the conclusion based off of an anonymous survey that vaccinated kids are more likely to have certain neurological diseases. HOWEVER that is a big user error to assume that they were caused by thr vaccines because there is one thing being forgotten: the sample size could very well be biased to one side. If people who are more likely to get a vaccine but because they have these diseases already then people with autism could be more likely to get vaccinated. Unfortunately we cant make that claim either because the reverse could be true.

So in other words the paper says nothing

3 is the exact same problem

4 same problem as 1. I thought it would be a good study especially because thats what health institute's tell pregnant women to avoid but they found the opposite result and supported the opposite claim they should have. I dont understand why its difficult. This is literally the first thing we learned in my class and the ap biology test uses this overlapping range to try to screw people up especially with bar graphs but people are just being dumb and not looking at there data. Also its a different topic anyways

5 support the experiment but not directly connected to vaccines. Also to any antivaxxers this paper is directing you to use mercury arguements not aluminium. Actually aluminium causing autism is basically destroyed. If youre interested in what to look for check 5. Of course this means youll have to check if mercury accumulation prevents mercury detoxification but it has the most potential so far. Still not proven or definite evidence just a leading direction

6 would love to check 6 but they dont appear to give me any data so i have to assume their claim is unjustified. Got to give me more than an abstract. All the other ones do. Seems like it could be a legitimate experiment but they need actual data with it.

7 not vaccines supports 5

8 problem is rat brains and human brains are not similar enough to assume the results are the same. Legitament study

9 mice not people

10 interesting and weird. The rat arguement isnt actually valid in this case but the topic is not connected to mercury levels in vaccines and it is not tested to model levela of mercury in human vaccines or with ethylmercury or whatever is within the vaccines. But it does prove interesting with source 5 and 7

Also your thing is an online library not a scientific journal

yea of scientific papers lol

besides all you cite is government institutions which are know to lie and manipulate data so you got no real credible sources

that is a fact

i guess you forgot that

that is like taking a liar into a court room and trying to use them as a credible source of info

but you think the measles is deadly too

your too young to even know

come into voice

if you dare

Its not data manipulation. Its called understanding data. All these papers that missuse 95% confidence intervals should be thrown away. Its literally purposely missuing data to lie to the public

not it is called data manipulation

period

And measles is in most cases not deadly i never actually said it was

http://humansarefree.com/2016/11/the-97-of-scientists-agree-on-climate.html

proof they do it

they do it in all fields

Its your source dummy

!mute @the21cat

dummy huh

fk off

too stupid for your own good

the shill can take a break

funny how only 75 scientist make up the 97% !!!!! how the fk does that work?????? is there only 77 geo scientist in the world

no it is called data manipulation

learn to identify it

same goes with the vaccine industry

the companys provide the tests for their vaccines meaning they can be biased considering it is them giving you the test results and the cdc does not verify it

think about that for a sec

Did you mute someone for refuting your evidence?

😂

@Magical Sheep no muted for calling names

are you blind

how you doing tonight shill

????

I’m fine, thanks for asking

the guy who never presents evidence for his argument just say it works

and none of my sources calls measles deadly lol unless you have a autoimmune problem

😄 I presented over 200 papers to The Mad Philosopher

Vaccinate yourself for your protection

and he call the papers i was providing a scientific journal which i never said either . just trying to put words in my mouth hahahaha

it is called strawman arguments

learn to spot those too

do you guys even know how to debate

like i said would love to get you guys in voice

lmao well I don't wanna be muted

https://www.scribd.com/doc/60166949/Roosendaal-study-of-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-children-in-the-Netherlands-Results-Survey

funny how the unvaccinated are healthier

notice the autism above it is non existent among non vaccinated in the netherlands

look like the case is closed

vaccines make you less healthy than someone unvaccinated

the problem with that is the fact of absolute incidence

you're using two different sample sizes

You know that correlation /=/ causation

Think.

It's not illegal yet

hahaha 2 different sample sizes hahahaha

the study proved it and that is all you can say

they show a direct correlation

but you cant think obviously

seems it is already to late for you hahahahaha

so where is your 200 papers ?????

hmmmm

provide them or i am just going to find out from mad and if you are lying you are gone

tired of liars

now if we do a really go jobs on vaccines we can lower that by 10 to 15 percent hahahaha !!!! right in your face and you still cant see it

do you know how to read between the lines

wait it is obvious you cant srry for the confusion

you guys have not even begun to open your minds yet and see things for what they are

@Magical Sheep where is your 200 papers ??????? waiting

!mute @Magical Sheep

>>mute 475727456666648586

<:vSuccess:390202497827864597> Successfully muted **Magical Sheep**#9332

>>ban @Deleted User permabanned porn

<:vSuccess:390202497827864597> Successfully banned <@586496462662270976>

Hey

What are your reasons for not wanting to vaccinate your children?

@TheRealOne r u provaxx or anti

Pro vax

Good

Wbu? @RobotiqueBleu

Same

Thank god

same