yea of scientific papers lol

besides all you cite is government institutions which are know to lie and manipulate data so you got no real credible sources

that is a fact

i guess you forgot that

that is like taking a liar into a court room and trying to use them as a credible source of info

but you think the measles is deadly too

your too young to even know

come into voice

if you dare

Its not data manipulation. Its called understanding data. All these papers that missuse 95% confidence intervals should be thrown away. Its literally purposely missuing data to lie to the public

not it is called data manipulation

period

And measles is in most cases not deadly i never actually said it was

http://humansarefree.com/2016/11/the-97-of-scientists-agree-on-climate.html

proof they do it

they do it in all fields

Its your source dummy

!mute @the21cat

dummy huh

fk off

too stupid for your own good

the shill can take a break

funny how only 75 scientist make up the 97% !!!!! how the fk does that work?????? is there only 77 geo scientist in the world

no it is called data manipulation

learn to identify it

same goes with the vaccine industry

the companys provide the tests for their vaccines meaning they can be biased considering it is them giving you the test results and the cdc does not verify it

think about that for a sec

Did you mute someone for refuting your evidence?

😂

@Magical Sheep no muted for calling names

are you blind

how you doing tonight shill

????

I’m fine, thanks for asking

the guy who never presents evidence for his argument just say it works

and none of my sources calls measles deadly lol unless you have a autoimmune problem

😄 I presented over 200 papers to The Mad Philosopher

Vaccinate yourself for your protection

and he call the papers i was providing a scientific journal which i never said either . just trying to put words in my mouth hahahaha