How can you just blindly accept what someone says?

I have never experienced any of the stuff that they say occurs. This includes but is not limited to: Unobstructed curvature, spinning at over 1000mph, watching ships and buildings sink below the horizon (just an optical illusion or a result of perspective, not a result of curvature).

I also doubt the ISS is in outer-space.

Wtf

I never used and bad words

Dindu nuffin

Physicists

Dammit

DIdin't work

Holy crap i can speak again

Thank you my friend from the other side

The air smells so much nicer here

Ok boomer

DARN

Polaris is at the center of the flat earth correct?

Im not a flat earther but im gonna say yes

so where does magnetic north sit

in relation to Polaris

is polaris above the arctic ?

yes

but compasses dont point towards polaris in all but 2 longitudes

^^^^^

Good morning everyone!

APOLLO JUMP MYTHBUSTERS BUSTED: https://imgur.com/a/oQalKYB

You know in the right panel, it seems to be some sort of cardboard cut out thingy

But when the apollo missions happened, those were 180 pound suits

30 pound suit under moons gravity

So 60 pounds including the person inside

What is gravity?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i19R5HHpQFQ

@floridaswamptrash the ground has a net positive charge. Applying a negative charge into the balloons increases attraction towards the ground.

What’s the point of the vid? It doesn’t actually address an apparent downward force

Aight

Downward force? Where?

Not seeing your apparent downward force.

Gravity?

Yeah bitches what’s this gravity thing we all are being laid down to the earth from basic stuff. Aka some nice semen

What's the cause of gravity? @Aba🥀 @Orlando

What’s gravity?

I'm asking you that

Everything has a gravitational pull

A non-zero value of the stress-energy momentum tensor.

The bigger it is the more it attracts

Well we are being pulled in this flat surface from semen so idk what gravity is

Our ancestors had been floating around and found this flat surface

So they used their 15 foot cocks to dispense semen

And they covered the earth using that semen

Big brain @Drewski4343

!mute @Orlando Sexual troll

Can you mute Orlando btw

Ty

np 👌

@Aba🥀 What is this gravitational pull? I know the claims made already

We all have a gravitational, cool story, but why?

Because we all have mass

What's causing it?

No no

Mass

Yes

That's not it lol

Have you not been to school?

The larger the mass the greater the pull

Saturns mass is less the jupiters and so it has less of a pull

Mass is the attraction of the gravitational pull

Gravity doesn't exist because of mass

Mass exists because of gravity (supposedly)

Try again

What causes gravity?

It's not technically a pull. In GR, It's the curvature of spacetime around mass.

Are you ok?

An object's geodesic is affected by curved space.

“gravity not as a force, but as a consequence of the curvature of spacetime caused by the uneven distribution of mass.”

Gravity is caused by mass

yarp

Mf said gravity causes mass

<:GWlulurdWaitWhat:402868030918492160>

how

I'm not sure what that means

even im confused

Orange said that gravity causes mass

Mf means mother f****

no, I got that, I'm not sure what "gravity causes mass" means haha

Idk either

bruh im not even a strong fighter in the shape debate and know that gravity surely does not cause mass, real or not

Yeah i think everyone knows that its not that way, i really dont know what the argument was

Aight I misspoke

I was playing a game so was really paying attention

fair

@Aba🥀 Gravity doesn't have an actual cause, it's an observed phenomena that the globe earth model uses to clear up a lot of things they can't explain

That’s linked to things with mass

You ever wondered why sand sticks to you even when youre dry?

I honestly dont know about that part but in theory if something is small enough they could orbit us

Dude

Gravity is an observed phenomenon that is observed to be linked to something with mass

Therefore gravity is caused by mass

That isn't how it works

How does it work then?

You'll never find anyone actually arguing gravity to say that mass is the whole reason that gravity exists

Besides you of course

You mean the literal reason why researchers believe gravity is caused isnt why people argue about the existence of gravity?

You know what

Give me a second

“With his theory of relativity, Albert Einstein explained how gravity is more than just a force: it is a curvature in the space-time continuum. That sounds like something straight out of science fiction, but simply put, the mass of an object causes the space around it to essentially bend and curve. This is often portrayed as a heavy ball sitting on a rubber sheet, and other smaller balls fall in towards the heavier object because the rubber sheet is warped from the heavy ball’s weight.”

From universetoday.com

I'm back

Anyways, I know all of that already

Then you admit im right?

Nowhere near

Why are you denying something that has been observed so many times and studied for years

Ok dude

haha Aba, you're just *defining* gravity.

Find me an experiment that shows gravity curves bends the space around it

You can define gravity all day but you aren't proving it's existence

Gravity states a b and c but can it actually stand up to what it claims?

There's no hard proof for gravity specifically. There's great evidence for General Relativity in general, though.

A bullet fired at the right angle will get pulled down with the curve of gravity effectively curving it around the earth if it has enough force

lol

Bro

What are you saying?

Idk

ikr that sounds ridiculous

That doesn't make any sense

What causes things to go down then when we throw them up?

There could be possible explanations that don't have to rely on gravity

@floridaswamptrash https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ym6nlwvQZnE

None are really as consistent as gravity, however.

Like other flat earthers do bring up relative density

What causes things to fall

Density is not really a force. Any type of relative density is also meaningless without a seperate force acting on them.

Magnetic balls don't prove nothing @Orestis

Why cant gravity exist? It doesn’t deny the flat earth theory

It doesn't line up is why we don't believe it

Aba, gravity as we know it would render the flat earth impossible.

Gravity is the force that a dense object makes

Gravity is a lot more than that

It isn't only on Earth

It essentially is mass attracting mass.

It's claimed to be anywhere and everywhere more or less

I think im thinking of cube earth nvm

If you take something the size of the earth that was flat, under the effects of gravity, it would collapse into a ball.

😂

Oh yeah sure it would

What

Gravity debate! Let's jump over to <#538929818834698260> where we can watch all the *action*

lol

Think of the center of mass pulling all parts of the object toward it.

Magnetic? Ha!

The most stable structure would be a sphere.

you mean the model that has us doing a 180 every 6 months (half complete orbit around the sun) in terms of our night sky view, yet we see the same stars throughout the year?

the supposed movement through space is a lot less believable than globe earth tbh

dang. i didnt know this was a common question. i thought i was pioneering. lol

I don't get the question. The earth's orbit is elliptical, there's no change of direction. It's like asking why the clouds don't change position when you look up on a merry-go-round.

The night sky is always the opposite side from the sun. This, in 6 months, we should be seeing the opposite direction, this stars would not be visible on a spheroid also Earth.

The biggest caveat, however, is that we do see different stars, and the overwhelming distance and varying angles overlap so that some stars can still be seen throughout.

So basically, the meme is a load of crap.

You can still see the star..

It’ll just be around at different times in the day

seeing some different stars is not the equivalent of consistently observing the same stars throughout the year when the night sky is supposedly aimed at a different direction. "overwhelming distance" is irrelevant

"It's like asking why the clouds don't change position when you look up on a merry-go-round" a more accurate analogy would be constantly seeing the same guy standing outside the merry-go-round the whole time you are on it. it wouldn't make sense. maybe there is actually no spinning to begin with

Make a nether portal, you’ll travel around the earth quicker

lol

“Big brain”

FlatSmackers Playlists Google Drive
💚RIP💚
All you could ever imagine showing the flat earth reality thousands of memes pdf's laser tests hundreds of links etc
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1o-A0BjaThVvpCHyasU0hIQkMWa4bseBu

hey guys, so the earth is curved right

its not flat?

Hello flatties

@I don't know please no trolling make sure you read <#484513575801454593>

I not trolling

What made you think I was?

Lol

@Panto Math👀 Thank you for linking that, I've been reading on it and it has some good content.

Did another hike today btw, no sign of curvature and the horizon is *always* at eye level.

Something seemingly impossible on a globe.

It's the same when you are at the beach or atop a mountain. Doesn't even make sense because if the Earth was curved it'd be lower than eye level.

What's your favorite flat earth?

Mines jupiter

!mute @I don't know trolling

Totally didn’t see that coming

Batcon, you must be psychic

I do t think a single laser test has every actually been done correctly to prove flat earth

do you have any evidence to support that assertion?

Well if the methods used by FE core or John D show anything

It’s that they have no clue what they are doing

Or they are being purposefully manipulative

why do you think that?

Oof I remember talking about FECORE and it was always ugly

Well for one

FECORE in specific used water level to determine their laser was level, which presupposes Earth as flat

FE core used a laser that had a divergence rate that was greater than the curvature drop rate of the earth

btw you havent answered my question

But falsely reported its divergence rate

have you considered doing the laser test correctly and posting it here to show the differences?

Even though what the producer of the model they used as well as the person that used the same mode a year prior on the same lake

John D supposedly used a cullimator on his lasers

It the copper pipes he used

so youre ignoring my question?

1st one

Were too wide to have any effect

So you still get that high divergence rate

Of which were no where in his presented calculations

I’m so confused, are you trying to answer a question?

i asked if he had evidence to back up his assertion

He brought up beam divergence which is a significant problem

I provided you evidence

That lies in the reports they themselves presented

you were talking about things, but you didnt actually provide evidence

Yeah I gotta admit, you still have burden of proof, Chief

what if you did the laser test correctly and posted the video?

Do I have to read you FE cores report

For you

Or John Ds report

That he used a bubble level on

To level the laser

Which is laughable

When you are trying to prove the non-existence of laser refraction

In the math he presented

Or even more laughable

As to how FE Core balanced the laser by pointing it at the horizon

Which means it would be slightly bent down

As well as they broke the collimator prior to testing

Nor did they bring the target grid to their target sites

Or get any pictures of the laser hitting the target

All verified by the president of the FE Core himself

@Silly Rabbit, Trix Are For Kids I can go on all day about the flaws in their experiments

Or the willful deception

Whichever one you prefer

Considering these people are getting thousands in donations

Yet not providing any tangible results from their experiments

Or putting in even a sliver of an attempt to do it properly

id love to see your video of your laser test done right

I’m not going to do a laser test

ok then

Because a laser test won’t prove anything

Because refraction exists

And divergence exists

then youre wasting my time with this arent you

if thats the case then it doesnt matter if they got it wrong

In deed

They are wasting their time

As well as donator money

And they know it

If you can either control or account for refraction then you can do it right

Well considering they used the wrong formula for refraction