Message from @Silly Rabbit, Trix Are For Kids

Discord ID: 641414216204681216


2019-11-05 21:51:14 UTC  

Hello flatties

2019-11-05 22:08:15 UTC  

@I don't know please no trolling make sure you read <#484513575801454593>

2019-11-05 22:13:08 UTC  

I not trolling

2019-11-05 22:13:24 UTC  

What made you think I was?

2019-11-05 22:17:02 UTC  

Lol

2019-11-05 22:38:32 UTC  

@Panto Math👀 Thank you for linking that, I've been reading on it and it has some good content.

2019-11-05 22:38:54 UTC  

Did another hike today btw, no sign of curvature and the horizon is *always* at eye level.

2019-11-05 22:39:02 UTC  

Something seemingly impossible on a globe.

2019-11-05 22:42:04 UTC  

It's the same when you are at the beach or atop a mountain. Doesn't even make sense because if the Earth was curved it'd be lower than eye level.

2019-11-05 22:57:59 UTC  

What's your favorite flat earth?

2019-11-05 22:58:04 UTC  

Mines jupiter

2019-11-05 22:58:54 UTC  

!mute @I don't know trolling

2019-11-05 22:58:55 UTC  

2019-11-05 22:59:08 UTC  

Totally didn’t see that coming

2019-11-05 22:59:20 UTC  

Batcon, you must be psychic

2019-11-05 23:09:17 UTC  

I do t think a single laser test has every actually been done correctly to prove flat earth

2019-11-05 23:09:50 UTC  

do you have any evidence to support that assertion?

2019-11-05 23:10:29 UTC  

Well if the methods used by FE core or John D show anything

2019-11-05 23:10:38 UTC  

It’s that they have no clue what they are doing

2019-11-05 23:10:49 UTC  

Or they are being purposefully manipulative

2019-11-05 23:11:06 UTC  

why do you think that?

2019-11-05 23:11:10 UTC  

Oof I remember talking about FECORE and it was always ugly

2019-11-05 23:11:17 UTC  

Well for one

2019-11-05 23:11:42 UTC  

FECORE in specific used water level to determine their laser was level, which presupposes Earth as flat

2019-11-05 23:11:46 UTC  

FE core used a laser that had a divergence rate that was greater than the curvature drop rate of the earth

2019-11-05 23:11:48 UTC  

btw you havent answered my question

2019-11-05 23:12:10 UTC  

But falsely reported its divergence rate

2019-11-05 23:12:50 UTC  

have you considered doing the laser test correctly and posting it here to show the differences?

2019-11-05 23:12:54 UTC  

Even though what the producer of the model they used as well as the person that used the same mode a year prior on the same lake

2019-11-05 23:13:28 UTC  

John D supposedly used a cullimator on his lasers

2019-11-05 23:13:36 UTC  

It the copper pipes he used

2019-11-05 23:14:14 UTC  

so youre ignoring my question?

2019-11-05 23:14:22 UTC  

1st one

2019-11-05 23:14:36 UTC  

Were too wide to have any effect

2019-11-05 23:14:45 UTC  

So you still get that high divergence rate

2019-11-05 23:14:56 UTC  

Of which were no where in his presented calculations

2019-11-05 23:15:03 UTC  

I’m so confused, are you trying to answer a question?

2019-11-05 23:15:22 UTC  

i asked if he had evidence to back up his assertion

2019-11-05 23:16:12 UTC  

He brought up beam divergence which is a significant problem

2019-11-05 23:16:20 UTC  

I provided you evidence

2019-11-05 23:16:32 UTC  

That lies in the reports they themselves presented