you mean the model that has us doing a 180 every 6 months (half complete orbit around the sun) in terms of our night sky view, yet we see the same stars throughout the year?

the supposed movement through space is a lot less believable than globe earth tbh

dang. i didnt know this was a common question. i thought i was pioneering. lol

seeing some different stars is not the equivalent of consistently observing the same stars throughout the year when the night sky is supposedly aimed at a different direction. "overwhelming distance" is irrelevant

"It's like asking why the clouds don't change position when you look up on a merry-go-round" a more accurate analogy would be constantly seeing the same guy standing outside the merry-go-round the whole time you are on it. it wouldn't make sense. maybe there is actually no spinning to begin with

i'm pretty much sold on the fact that we're not on a spinning ball in a void without meaning. but occasionally i get stumped on something concerning the flat earth map that eventually gets explained. can anyone here breakdown the points made in this thread?

https://www.metabunk.org/flat-earth-theory-debunked-by-short-flights-qf27-qf28-from-australia-to-south-america.t6483/

@Flat Earth PhD that's what i was thinking. maps are often compromised by the ones who make them, leading to exaggerated sizes of certain continents. a model doesn't necessarily need a perfect map at hand in order to be correct. if such a claim was made against flat earth for example, it would be hypocritical since the globe maps differ in this aspect.

I'm at the point to where I read all those arguments against the "widely accepted" FE map, but so many past facts came to mind that i was still like.....*itz flat doe*

i always wondered if Israel was at the center

its a bit anti climatic for this whole thing to be crafted superbly and at the center of it all is....water lol

i looked into that once but not too deeply. there's forests with mini plateaus, but they appear to be giant dead tree stumps because the complex patterns resemble plant cells

i dont think the book of enoch is scripture, but it may hold some historical facts

dude you guys are always able to find some obscure you tuber with profound videos even tho they only have like 2K subscribers. lol

i'll check it out for sure

The codependent parts of a cell are already enough to prove that creation was simultaneous and not gradual

how can an eye ball arise from trial and error

or how about when they claim dinosaur bones are millions years old, yet we cant find missing links that should exist tens of thousands of years ago for any creature???

everytime i discuss this with someone they're describing evolution as natural selection

then when i tediously point that out, it ends ugh

just a few years ago i'd laugh at all this tbh

all i wanted to do was pitch movies to hollywood

took me a year to admit it's run by a cult

i have a huge story that would've rocked the house mannn

lol

all original

but it would be too *problematic* in today's hollywood

i have high freemason ancestry so i have a big Luke Skywalker complex lol. *I"LL NEVER JOIN YOU*

dude you cant even have a level headed white male protagonist rn

that alone will make them change my story

again...level headed

lol

Peace dude. Thanks for answering the question

@Drewski4343 nahh dude i haven't pitched this movie. there's no way some random guy can just walk in and start a film production that'll cost over 100 million lol

i also have a cartoon idea

i'd assume a cartoon is easier to achieve but, mehhh

i kinda moved past it all

i just make these things for myself and those around me

i'm pretty sure this cartoon would be the next spongebob. there's a void rn when it comes to original cartoons. no kids are drawn to the tv anymore

its not like the early 2000s

which is the era i'm nostalgic for, as evident by my profile pic lol

those were the golden days of FOX. the simpsons, the batman animated series etc

i grew up during the KidsWB era

Pokemon, Yugioh, jackie chan, teen titans etc

i think they stopped showing animaniacs in the year 2000 which is when i started watching

i was molded by it...

lol

nowadays the entertainment is pretty golden on things like you tube

instead of tv

i can't really animate. my area is mainly in crafting stories

i'm always blown away by how people can just draw

i'll be honest and admit i'm kinda lazy when it comes to learning new skills lol. people say i'm good at making music but that came naturally some how.

i bought two books on ebay that are for beginners

but i havent even gone through 5 pages yet

i was planning on drawing well by now

kudos to you for doing it. it REQUIRES diligence

It's addicting

you'll always be wondering what jingle you could potentially be making at any moment

ever since i researched flat earth, you tube has been recommending me 24/7 vids on "how the universe works" lol

the cause of downward force on a flat earth might be uncomfortable for the world of scientism because it is probably God dependent

even an atheist would admit that God's existence would surely have an effect on the laws of physics. perhaps gravity is just a downward force in relation to where He resides.

who knows

gravity is something to ponder no matter what side you're currently on tbh

ugh i hate those terms. lol

its starting to look like my old cram session note sheets

i didnt mind physics. i had no discipline or patience for calculus tho

too bad cause i cant pay my bills without calculus . now my debt is always approaching infinity

jk lol

the whole thing was a joke. including my debt confession. i'm very dedicated to making quips

but homeless in a cool way, like being a pokemon trainer

the global warming crowd hates boomers cause they tend to deny it all, which is more reasonable than they think. the boomers witnessed so many fear mongering predictions and none of them came true.

the elites have already divided people by race in flying colors (bad pun intended) as well as gender

now they're strengthening the divide between generations

Not me

"Dead Stars" would be stationary points that would not be in our night sky throughout the year since according to the heliocentric model the night sky in december is a 180 flip compared to june. how do we see the same non moving "dead stars" throughout the year

NASA is the most successful fanfic writer

"Dead Stars" would be stationary points that would not be in our night sky throughout the year since according to the heliocentric model the night sky in december is a 180 flip compared to june. how do we see the same non moving "dead stars" throughout the year
Anyone gonna answer this?

Once again, valid questions that dismantle the heliocentric model are buried with self affirming text books instead of answers

i know you saw the question

answer?

i asked you first

i still havent received an answer

"Dead Stars" would be stationary points that would not be in our night sky throughout the year since according to the heliocentric model the night sky in december is a 180 flip compared to june. how do we see the same non moving "dead stars" throughout the year, or any stars really

i've heard scientists say stars are exploded suns

in many cases

i'm referring to the ones that are supposedly no longer existent yet we still see the light

but we see that beam of light even when we are looking into a flipped side region of space between 6 months of rotation around the sun?

thats what i'm addressing

you wouldn't see the same stars in winter that you do in the summer if earth really is rotating around the sun. makes no sense. walk around something with your back towards it, and tell me if you see the same things in front you the whole time

Flat earth forces people to acknowledge God's existence

the night sky is aimed at a different regions in space throughout earth's orbit around the sun according to the heliocentric model

yet we see the same stars in june and december

march and september

etc

this is futile. my point is clear

fixed stars wouldnt be visible on opposite ends of the earth's supposed 360 rotation around the sun. march and september would be 180 flipped views toward space at night. fixed stars would not be seen year round at all

Common Sense

is my point not logical?

do you trust a source over your own logic when it adds up

key note "when it adds up"