lol

“Big brain”

FlatSmackers Playlists Google Drive
💚RIP💚
All you could ever imagine showing the flat earth reality thousands of memes pdf's laser tests hundreds of links etc
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1o-A0BjaThVvpCHyasU0hIQkMWa4bseBu

hey guys, so the earth is curved right

its not flat?

Hello flatties

@I don't know please no trolling make sure you read <#484513575801454593>

I not trolling

What made you think I was?

Lol

@Panto Math👀 Thank you for linking that, I've been reading on it and it has some good content.

Did another hike today btw, no sign of curvature and the horizon is *always* at eye level.

Something seemingly impossible on a globe.

It's the same when you are at the beach or atop a mountain. Doesn't even make sense because if the Earth was curved it'd be lower than eye level.

What's your favorite flat earth?

Mines jupiter

!mute @I don't know trolling

Totally didn’t see that coming

Batcon, you must be psychic

I do t think a single laser test has every actually been done correctly to prove flat earth

do you have any evidence to support that assertion?

Well if the methods used by FE core or John D show anything

It’s that they have no clue what they are doing

Or they are being purposefully manipulative

why do you think that?

Oof I remember talking about FECORE and it was always ugly

Well for one

FECORE in specific used water level to determine their laser was level, which presupposes Earth as flat

FE core used a laser that had a divergence rate that was greater than the curvature drop rate of the earth

btw you havent answered my question

But falsely reported its divergence rate

have you considered doing the laser test correctly and posting it here to show the differences?

Even though what the producer of the model they used as well as the person that used the same mode a year prior on the same lake

John D supposedly used a cullimator on his lasers

It the copper pipes he used

so youre ignoring my question?

1st one

Were too wide to have any effect

So you still get that high divergence rate

Of which were no where in his presented calculations