civil-debate
Discord ID: 538929818834698260
127,199 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 56/1272
| Next
i see
so right now a lot of anarchists tend to support progressive candidates who help remove capitalist reliance, and focus on buildin alternative ways of living
Is there anarchist politicians rn?
no
best we've got are some communists and progressives
Oh that makes it kinda hard
without support from powerfull people
it's funny because anarchists naturally tend towards "I don't want to lead nor anyone to lead" but also go "well these communists are kinda like us, so we'll support them to advance our goals"
but feel free to think about it yourself. Imagine you're fed up with the world
and want to live on your own
or maybe with a small group
how would you go about doing it?
Id probably go to a farm or small town
generally speaking most people don't know how to farm nor have the land for it. We can't build our own electronics nor generate our electricity
some people can build, but we don't have the materials to do it
things like mining are pretty heavily regulated and under statist/capitalist control
What if they use communist to rise in power a little, and then "betray" the commies?
see the problem is that you have your leading communist+anarchist party
and then the masses
the masses start supporting the party, and are either communist or anarchist
the anarchists then go "fuck you we're done with this"
and try to dismantle
so all the anarchists pull support
the communists go ๐คท and continue their powerstructure
and we end up with the same communist system
Oh thats bad
anarchists could perhaps try *enforcing* anarchism
but the problem is that without the support communists will just continue pushing communism
and historically they have outnumbered us anyway
as anarchism is kinda a weird idea
I see
and one that really is only attractive in today's society
rather than in a historic communist one
like today we can easily imagine automated systems doing a lot of cool stuff
but back then?
Is there any effective way for you guys to rise in power and stay?
like legit most people were farmers and working in factories
the only way to really do that would be to go against anarchism
since the whole point is to *not* have a coercive violent government enforcing it's will
this is why IMO the best solution is to instead focus on building alternatives
rather than trying to fuck with the existing stuff
maybe make nonprofit organizations that help push anarchist causes
do anarchist acts even if illegal
etc
I see
digitally this is really easy
we have stuff like scihub and torrents
that help share knowledge and media to all
copyright is a very easy thing to reject
we've also got censorship resistent distributed networks and infrastructure
so things like website takedowns can't happen
the hardware for the internet is still reliant on the statist+capitalist one, but mesh networks are being built that avoid that
and I mentioned earlier about electricity and solar power and all that
If no one owns anything, how would internet work?
it's a complicated question
so as it stands the anarchist idea of using things that exist, is that people should be free to use them if they please and see fit
so building systems around that is the goal
a modern day example would be those bikes and cars you pay to use and then park when you're done and someone else can pay and use them
or something like public transportation
I see
just remove the payment models and pretend no one owns them
for the internet, it's structured using routers and wires/wireless connections
and then we have individual devices connect to it
so basically we've have nodes, similar to how cell towers are
that anyone can connect to
and those nodes would connect to each other in a decentralized/distributed way
the structure of the network is called a mesh network
there's no central authority to ask where to route the packets
so if one node goes bad, the system still works
And if someone steals the car? would that be considered "hurting anarchism" and you guys would use violence to get the car back?
likewise, since it's a share system, people have more incentive to keep it running
well the concept of "stealing" isn't a thing in anarchism
so say someone takes the car and uses it
they drive it somewhere
eventually they will get out of the car
and when they do, someone else may use it
the only way to prevent that is physical violence
at which point we arrive at the "how do you prevent opposing ideologies from attacking"
so some anarchists have gotten the idea to *use* capitalist systems to help enforce anarchism
So someone takes a gun and says "well i control this land now and if you dont like it you die"
at least for the time being
right
that's how capitalism functions
you basically have to threaten the person
Which is against anarchism?
in today's society we abstract that threat
we go "if you dont' get off my land, I'll call the police who will then hurt you"
right
so how some anarchists go about fixing this problem is by owning things under capitalism, but then making access anarchistic
in copyright terms this is called "copyleft"
the idea is that using the copyright system they say that anyone can use it, but they *must* also adopt the copyleft model
for copyrighted works and software it works well, since anyone who uses it then provides their changes for everyone else
for physical stuff we can see groups that buy land and then allow people to squat there
or buy food and share it with the poor
and of course anarchists still participate in capitalism (we have to pretty much)
so we all have our own things as well
I see
because we don't live under anarchism just yet
but we can still try to adopt anarchist ideas
one big issue people tend to have is "I don't want to share my toothbrush" or whatever
127,199 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 56/1272
| Next