at which point we arrive at the "how do you prevent opposing ideologies from attacking"

so some anarchists have gotten the idea to *use* capitalist systems to help enforce anarchism

So someone takes a gun and says "well i control this land now and if you dont like it you die"

at least for the time being

right

that's how capitalism functions

you basically have to threaten the person

Which is against anarchism?

in today's society we abstract that threat

we go "if you dont' get off my land, I'll call the police who will then hurt you"

right

so how some anarchists go about fixing this problem is by owning things under capitalism, but then making access anarchistic

in copyright terms this is called "copyleft"

the idea is that using the copyright system they say that anyone can use it, but they *must* also adopt the copyleft model

for copyrighted works and software it works well, since anyone who uses it then provides their changes for everyone else

for physical stuff we can see groups that buy land and then allow people to squat there

or buy food and share it with the poor

and of course anarchists still participate in capitalism (we have to pretty much)

so we all have our own things as well

I see

because we don't live under anarchism just yet

but we can still try to adopt anarchist ideas

one big issue people tend to have is "I don't want to share my toothbrush" or whatever

which the anarchist response is: we have more than enough products for everyone to have one

something like phones we have so many of that not all of them can be used at once

no need to share

though we *could* go further and say things like game consoles or tvs can be shared

even though it's largely unneeded

Well

the sharing would cut down on production which can help drive a sustainable economy

if a group wants to be in power they can do it just like that

usually anarchists are also anti-consumption

right

anarchists don't want to be "in power"

we want to live freely

IMO having everyone able to live comfortably and freely is much more important than letting a minority enforce their will onto others

it's a long road to get to the world I envision, but IMO it's worth it

Not everyone is an anarchist tho

and some people will want power

and get it easily

the question I hve for those people is: why?