lounge
Discord ID: 484514023698726912
1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 278/4068
| Next
Idk
maybe one was a mistake
and I will not shut my trap...
Maybe theyโre both right
Possibility
well in gematria / numerology the 1 could become a 6 in a sense I think
perhaps
Not sure huh?
Talking of Darth Traya made me listen to the Kotor soundtrack on you tube. Man those were the star wars days
Considering the Codex Sianaticus is A) older, B) in the same language as the gospels and C) Not written by a Power Hungry Roman
I think that the Greek copy is right and the Receptus is wrong
sort of like multiplication maybe?
okay
Could be division as well
Also at the time of writing Codex Sianaticus was still written under the Eastern Roman Empire prior to Byzantium
yes, we always look for the earliest forms
of course there could have been deception going on back then too
for either
There is one other translation that is older, and that is the Peshitta, however it is in Aramaic, not the original written language of the Gospel
hmm... I thought that the original languages of the bible were "Hebrew" (Phoenician-Canaanite) - Old Testament and
Aramaic and Greek - New Testament
Here is the Aramaic Peshitta verse
looks very Persian / Arabic
Aramaic is the mother language of both Persian and Arabic yes
I know ^^
Similar to how Phoenecian is our mother tongue as well as to Latin
yes
I'm thinking both 666 and 616 could be right from gematria of Latin vs hebrew
yes, with Greek and Old Italic before Latin
However, there is a catch
Nron Qsr
What does that mean?
That's the Hebrew Peshitta
NOT the Aramaic one
Greek and Hebrew say 666, Latin says 616, that's 2:1, let's translate the Aramaic one maybe we can get a tie?
666 also relates to the Giza Pyramids:
The number 666 is the sum of numbers from 1 to 36 forming the so-called Magickal Seal of Sun, a grid of 6x6.
Yes there might also be clues to this in the book of the dead! The Israelites took great knowledge with them when they left Egypt
Latin drops the second ื . I'm thinking they both can spell out the Same term in their respective languages
hmm
It's also worth noting that different languages even between Hebrew and Aramaic have different interpretations
Also the Babylonian numerical system back then wasn't what we have now.
The Romans used MXLCVII
yes
So they would have said Six hundred and sixty and six
like the old films
among other things ^^
The concept of addition was present however
I found the Aramaic verse, I am unable to translate the Aramaic Peshitta Revelations 13:18 what it says is your guess is as good as mine unless I try to learn Aramaic from scratch
If you are interested in doing some further research migfht I suggest a book from 1990 called a dictionary of Jewish Palenstinian Aramaic of the Byzantine period (Dictionaries of Talmud, Midrash, and Targum)
@Human Sheeple Have you checked out <#547645432604393482> ?
@Seeker of Truth Same for you. ๐
ISBN-13: 978-0801872341
ISBN-10: 0801872340
Question 1 yes and no, here you can say death to the turks it's not a problem, but you talk about leviticus 18:22 and how homosexuality is an abomination you might find yourself out of a job. People getting jailed for saying bad words is very rare and there seems to be this conditioning by the masses to not use certain phrases or slurs. That's right mah nigga.
**Leviticus 18:22 - New Revised Standard Version (NRSV)**
```Dust
<22> You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination. ```
fantastic thank you
Question 2 No, that is an absolute conflict of interest and is special interest money to bribe poltiicians to commit mass infanticide.
no
no
no
no
PSYOP /Disinfo
yes
yes
@The Gwench (Intel Gatherer)
XD
Question 3. Tough question, Using top secret classifications to cover up war crimes is a crime in of itself so you get the problem of who polices the police. So in a way Julian Assange was policing the police for covering up a helicopter shooting a bus full of Children in Karballah Iraq. Yes he leaked top secret information, but that information should not have been top secret in the first place.
However he's used that loophole to then leak a whole bunch of cables about Princesses giving the Saudi diplomat a snotty nose about the wrong champagne glass. It has highlighted how oblivious the elite are to the day to day woes of the layman.
I need help with more ideas on the question of the day? Can you DM me some ideas? You seem to know a lot. ๐
Question 4. I think the mandella effect is more straightforward than time travel and portals, I think it is a bi-product of the toxins in our vaccines, food, water, drink, medicine, air combined with ongoing mass censorship and shill attempting to rewrite history combined with hollywood and their nostalgia films intended to show you how things weren't in the past.
Question 5. I think QAnon is certainly a high ranking deep state member, but I think is likely controlled opposition with an agenda of his/her own so I am distrustful of whomever QAnon may be.
Fair enough
Question 6. Drama beating attention seekative PC Cry baby, let the mob take care of him.
Question 7. Well Cancer is not an unpredictable side effect of eating GMOs and is well documented. Your question is a non sequetor fallacy, how can one predict what unpredictable consequences will be with GMO foods especially now we have only been tinkering with plant DNA using gene editing techniques for a few decades. Selective breeding however has been tried and tested for millennia and I see no issue with it.
OK that's all my answers
Oh wow there's more
๐
Question 8: Was 9/11 an inside job? WTC7
Enough said
Question 9: The CRU Emails clearly show a lot of meetings with special interest groups including most notably oil companies such as Shell. I think the original climate change investigations were backed on real data but then the corruption started so the data was deliberately over exaggerated to give alarmist unrealistic predictions to justify an emergency worldwide carbon tax.
Question 10: I don't know but I intend to find out, I have some preliminary designs of a hydrogen solar powered balloon airship drone, I don't even know if it is possible to fly there let alone what may or may not be beneath the ice. One thing I do know is a lot of mystery and secrecy and treaties shroud the truth about Antarctica.
Question 11: NASA Apollo moonlandings, were they a hoax?
https://images-ext-1.discordapp.net/external/hWkGrP_wvgYN1G4P5YXLKb0nekwWlVyp0BWeIpJiI9g/https/cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/355938062574026752/471908765197926400/WeDidntGoThere.gif
Buzz admitted "we didn't go there" that's a guilty plea no need to investigate, yes is the answer.
k
There I took some roles. Communism, build the wall, flat earth, gay frogs, aliens, military abductions
Millions will freeze to death
If we do a green new deal
Not if you invest in sheep and produce enough wooly jumpers for everyone!
๐
It's no joke, the ZOG controlled stores in the gentrified overpriced CCTV microwave sweatshop megacorporation stores sell PLASTIC CLOTHES
Plastic clothes don't keep you warm
Wind power can power the world!
They now can say "cotton shirt" so long as it is 60 percent cotton 40 percent polymer, they're allowed to say that.
Polymer ๐
When it's windy and the mechanisms don't break and the birds don't fly into it, yes wind is a viable part of the solution
solar can help too, but if it is cloudly and calm, there's no power
People will work at home and food that produces farts will be used to keep ourselves warm during the nuclear winter, despite the smell
Hmm ๐ค. It could be some of my questions are even wrong. I donโt know.
I think one of them was a non sequetor fallacy, and two were "open secrets" shall we say
But the rest were valid questions
I think a few were made to be that way
On purpose lol
I see so rhetorical questions like "does a bear take a dump in the woods?"
That's a huge hydra from diablo 3
God is a wizard
Health risks associated with 5G?
Hm
Your own chart says that a cell phone's transmitter does not produce ionizing radiation, and does not cause cancer.
The dosage is accumulative
Also, it's made by Randall Munroe?
I love that guy! He writes XKCD
He also worked for NASA
earth flat or round?
im stuck
Look down see for yourself
Flat
best proof?
@BiggerPicture best proof. Go look over water and try to measure a curve
Direct measurements
is that possible?
to measure
Globe suppose to measure 8 inches per mile squared
Curve
ok
So 3 miles is 6 ft
10 miles is 66 ft
3 miles 2 feet?
wait my bad
2 miles 2.6 ft
3 miles 6 ft
i gotcha
8 inches x miles
24 inches
3 miles
or am i stupid
ok
and how do i measure at some water?
Go 8 inches ร miles diatance รท 12 ร miles distance =
So 8 inches ร 2 miles = 16 inches รท by 12 inches (1 foot) equals 1.3 ร 2 miles = 2.6 feet.
So 30 miles would go like this
8 inches ร 30 miles = 240 inches รท 12 inches (1 foot) = 20 feet ร 30 miles = 600 feet curve
I think lol
Yes that's right
So if you believe in the globe and never measured this, that makes you part of a belief system
R = 6,371,000
h0 = 2,800
d0 = 443,000
R^2 = 4.0589641ร10ยนยณ
d^2+R^2 => d1 = root(h0^2 +2Rh0
d1 = root(2,800 + 2 x6,371,000 x 2,800)
d1 = root (7840000 + 35677600000)
d1 = root(35685440000)
d1 = 188905.9025 to 4 d.p.
(R+h1)^2 = d2^2 + R^2 => h1 = root(d2^2+R^2) - R
d2 = d0-d1
d2 = 443,000 - 188905.9025
d2 = 254094.0974
h1 = root (254094.0974^2 + 6,371,000^2) - 6,371,000
h1 = root(64563810383.4510 + 4.0589641ร10ยนยณ) - 6,361,000
h1 = root(4.065420481038345108741ร10ยนยณ) -6,371,000
h1 = 6376064.9942 - 6,371,000
h1 = 5064.994
5064>3800 Proof Earth's flat
Water curves uphill on a ball ๐
So this is my equation
7.98 x y2/12
๐
That's their standard refraction model for 123 miles
Well the blue is the earth. The red is the path light takes in their standard refraction model
So anything on the earth at the blue will be elevated to the red
by refraction
So that is the standard 7/6 R
If your at 1000 miles altitude I guess you can see the other side lol
Here's the thing. Actual experiments show refraction varies from 20X to - 20X
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/379214321907007488/533401661776068669/unknown.png
On the other hand, our empirical results show that the
refraction coefficient k may reach magnitudes as large as +12 to +16 over grassland at 1.8 m. This clearly
exceeds previously published โextreme valuesโ (e.g., maximum values of k = +6 at 1.5 m height over grassland,
cf. Hรผbner [1977]). We acknowledge that surface types like ice or water may even produce larger refraction
effects, as described in section 2.
As you can see from what I just posted , they measured what would be radius that would be 16 times larger than the earth radius
They think k they model refraction ,.In fact they model the deviation from from the globe radius.
They don't measure the refractive index of the air. the impute it from the deviation of an expected value
of course. Their model follows earths curve perfectly
think about how nonsensical that is. exactly equals the curve of the earth...idiocy...
GHOST HAWK
Classified helicopter
invisible VTOL transport aircraft
Wtf fresh hell is this? ๐ฎ
https://newspunch.com/vatican-cardinal-raping-vanilla-sex/
๐คข
๐คฎ
This is bullshit!!! Fearmongering. ๐ก
https://nworeport.me/2019/02/27/dem-candidate-claims-short-time-before-city-is-underwater/
Hey everyone, **The Outer Light** just posted a video! Go check it out!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Rdb5saiv0k
https://youtu.be/fSadoYshVNg
#<#538745095839678465>
It is their plan to destroy the middle class. Given that they believe it is the middle class that consume the most resources.
No the elite do by far
The 1% yes
Give me a car any day
Fuck cars, trucks are best
Big diesels
Yeah. ๐
>>mute 261257594709082113
<:vSuccess:390202497827864597> Successfully muted **Bazinghis Khan**#4349
i will abide by the laws of this land
>>unmute @Bazinghis Khan#4349
<:vSuccess:390202497827864597> Successfully unmuted **Bazinghis Khan**#4349
im still muted lol
Lag?
tjx
thx*
Check out all the conspiracies they ADMITTED
Think what conspiracies they DON'T ADMIT
is that 4chain
4chan got astroturfed years ago where have you been?
yes we already know
Lol @Human Sheeple these guys
R = 6,371,000
h0 = 2,800
d0 = 443,000
R^2 = 4.0589641ร10ยนยณ
d^2+R^2 => d1 = root(h0^2 +2Rh0
d1 = root(2,800 + 2 x6,371,000 x 2,800)
d1 = root (7840000 + 35677600000)
d1 = root(35685440000)
d1 = 188905.9025 to 4 d.p.
(R+h1)^2 = d2^2 + R^2 => h1 = root(d2^2+R^2) - R
d2 = d0-d1
d2 = 443,000 - 188905.9025
d2 = 254094.0974
h1 = root (254094.0974^2 + 6,371,000^2) - 6,371,000
h1 = root(64563810383.4510 + 4.0589641ร10ยนยณ) - 6,361,000
h1 = root(4.065420481038345108741ร10ยนยณ) -6,371,000
h1 = 6376064.9942 - 6,371,000
h1 = 5064.994
3,800 meters < < 5,064 meters
Ergo Earth's flat
thats alot of numebs sporry
Sorry you're a glober, I forgot you can't do math.
Globe = Mathematically impossible
maaaaaan thats ruse
sory i meant rude
It's alright I understand that you blindly accept whatever the government tells you, you lack critical thinking skills, your head is full of logical fallacies, you probably took vaccines laced with brain damage inducing chemicals, you drink fluoridated water, eat sugar that clogs up your blood vessels and you are full of stereotypes about things you can't be bothered to research for yourself. Sorry my bad.
Oof rekt
Wtf?
Gnite all
Night
Alright, <@!495116723629064202> has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.
Who ping!?!
Wut
!mute <@495116723629064202>
Genders x โ (CF), it doesn't look like you can use that. <:SMILESWEAT6:403540174069432320>
Smh
Sorry guys
Was there a ghost ping?
A troll
Yea
That's annoying
Yup
oof
<:whopinged:489114411387191296>
<:tomato:507986614010511380>
hmm
@The Gwench hello
what are your thoughts on mandela effect
@KuhRapMan I think it is a real phenomenon. Especially since there are so many that remember the same things. However, I couldnโt explain how or why.
The mandela effect is very hard to prove
For or against
I believe it is a real phenomenon.
Guys, I died from eating tooo much cereal
Thisfrog#0042 (378336372299268096) is now muted for '**Unspecified.**', alright? <:THUMBSUP6:403560443345371137>
I found a photo that I laughed at and it fits very well here
That rainbow tunnel thing you two keep posting to ignorantly dismiss how there is observably a South pole is :Yikes:, as well as obviously dishonest.
There is a point in the sky above the Arctic, North of the equator that the stars rotate around, which is the North pole. Everyone agrees this is the North pole. But when there is another point in the sky that is South of the equator, that even has the stars spinning opposite direction around it which is what we expect to see on a globe, you now instantly dismiss this.
Sounds honest ๐
That vortex hallway gif you keep posting to dismiss observable facts isn't an enclosed sphere.
@Quorum I suggest you have that debate with @Human Sheeple ๐
How do you explain earthquackes in a flat earth?
What about the despair code though
1,016,926 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 278/4068
| Next