Message from @Seeker of Truth
Discord ID: 550488171289378827
That's the Hebrew Peshitta
NOT the Aramaic one
Greek and Hebrew say 666, Latin says 616, that's 2:1, let's translate the Aramaic one maybe we can get a tie?
666 also relates to the Giza Pyramids:
The number 666 is the sum of numbers from 1 to 36 forming the so-called Magickal Seal of Sun, a grid of 6x6.
Yes there might also be clues to this in the book of the dead! The Israelites took great knowledge with them when they left Egypt
Latin drops the second נ . I'm thinking they both can spell out the Same term in their respective languages
hmm
It's also worth noting that different languages even between Hebrew and Aramaic have different interpretations
Also the Babylonian numerical system back then wasn't what we have now.
The Romans used MXLCVII
yes
So they would have said Six hundred and sixty and six
like the old films
among other things ^^
The concept of addition was present however
I found the Aramaic verse, I am unable to translate the Aramaic Peshitta Revelations 13:18 what it says is your guess is as good as mine unless I try to learn Aramaic from scratch
If you are interested in doing some further research migfht I suggest a book from 1990 called a dictionary of Jewish Palenstinian Aramaic of the Byzantine period (Dictionaries of Talmud, Midrash, and Targum)
@Human Sheeple Have you checked out <#547645432604393482> ?
@Seeker of Truth Same for you. 😃
Question 1 yes and no, here you can say death to the turks it's not a problem, but you talk about leviticus 18:22 and how homosexuality is an abomination you might find yourself out of a job. People getting jailed for saying bad words is very rare and there seems to be this conditioning by the masses to not use certain phrases or slurs. That's right mah nigga.
**Leviticus 18:22 - New Revised Standard Version (NRSV)**
```Dust
<22> You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination. ```
fantastic thank you
Question 2 No, that is an absolute conflict of interest and is special interest money to bribe poltiicians to commit mass infanticide.
no
no
no
no
PSYOP /Disinfo
yes
yes
@The Gwench (Intel Gatherer)
XD
Question 3. Tough question, Using top secret classifications to cover up war crimes is a crime in of itself so you get the problem of who polices the police. So in a way Julian Assange was policing the police for covering up a helicopter shooting a bus full of Children in Karballah Iraq. Yes he leaked top secret information, but that information should not have been top secret in the first place.
However he's used that loophole to then leak a whole bunch of cables about Princesses giving the Saudi diplomat a snotty nose about the wrong champagne glass. It has highlighted how oblivious the elite are to the day to day woes of the layman.
I need help with more ideas on the question of the day? Can you DM me some ideas? You seem to know a lot. 😃
Question 4. I think the mandella effect is more straightforward than time travel and portals, I think it is a bi-product of the toxins in our vaccines, food, water, drink, medicine, air combined with ongoing mass censorship and shill attempting to rewrite history combined with hollywood and their nostalgia films intended to show you how things weren't in the past.
Question 5. I think QAnon is certainly a high ranking deep state member, but I think is likely controlled opposition with an agenda of his/her own so I am distrustful of whomever QAnon may be.
Fair enough
Question 6. Drama beating attention seekative PC Cry baby, let the mob take care of him.
Question 7. Well Cancer is not an unpredictable side effect of eating GMOs and is well documented. Your question is a non sequetor fallacy, how can one predict what unpredictable consequences will be with GMO foods especially now we have only been tinkering with plant DNA using gene editing techniques for a few decades. Selective breeding however has been tried and tested for millennia and I see no issue with it.
OK that's all my answers
Oh wow there's more
😂
Question 8: Was 9/11 an inside job? WTC7
Enough said
Question 9: The CRU Emails clearly show a lot of meetings with special interest groups including most notably oil companies such as Shell. I think the original climate change investigations were backed on real data but then the corruption started so the data was deliberately over exaggerated to give alarmist unrealistic predictions to justify an emergency worldwide carbon tax.